Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You know how everyone was afraid that Bush would not let go of power? It just HAPPENED in Canada

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:47 AM
Original message
You know how everyone was afraid that Bush would not let go of power? It just HAPPENED in Canada
The governor general granted Harper's request to prorogue parliament. In essence, parliament has been dissolved so that the PM doesn't have to give up power to the opposition coalition, which controls more seats in the house than him. Frankly, I'm frightened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now he has to call an election which he will lose
Relax. Harper's history. The coalition will run as an alliance. Bubye Harper - you've been harpooned and have no room to move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. No, he doesn't
It gives him two months before he has to face a confidence vote. He's using that time to prepare a budget which the coalition would not possibly vote down. It's pretty much the end of the coalition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. A couple things can happen...
He can make a shitty budget, get tossed....

He can make a decent budget, get support of the Commons, and everyone is happy (thats democracy really).

Or he can make a good budget, get tossed, and the Liberals/NDP will take a major PR blow.

Its likely he will try and appease everyone. In the end, thats not a terrible thing, though getting rid of him would of been nice. The threat is there now. He won't troll around again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. True it buys him time without dissolving parliament
but how does he pass a confidence vote here? If the majority want him out, he will have two months to call an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. He's going to bring out a budget which the opposition can't possibly vote against
It will essentially break up the coalition. Then it's back to the same old Harper. There's no way the opposition parties will stick together after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Then it's not really a coalition
and it certainly could not have lasted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It probably wouldn't have lasted
But it would have destroyed Harper's political career, which was what most of us were hoping for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Whats so bad about him bringout out a spectacular budget?
Just saying...

Haper now knows not to overstep his bounds. One of the best things that could happen would be getting rid of him, but this alternative isn't bad at all. Also, it allows the opposition to have a strong role in government without bearing responsibility for it during this economic upheaval. There are certainly scenarios in which a coalition government would of handed the Conservatives a majority government the next election. If you can rule without being the ruler, you get the best of both worlds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Um, this was a pretty normal, expected move
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 11:51 AM by Oregone
Its also well within the rules.

He just won an election a little over a month ago. The situation is more complicated than what you make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It wasn't normal. At all.
It's the first time in Canadian history a Prime Minister has prorogued parliament in order to not face a confidence vote. It sets a terrible precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Being a precedent doesn't mean its out of the procedural rules
You are frightened? This relates to Bush making a power grab? Come on now. There is no coup here. I think you are being a bit over-dramatic.

Yes, it sucks the GG granted the request, but its not the end of the world. It was well predicted it would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Aren't Preogies Little Potato Treats?
I thought that Perogies *ere little potato treats made by people in Pennsylvania.

Am I *rong?

Note: In protest of the continued occupation of OUR *hite House by the illegal and totally corrupt Bush/Cheney regime of thugs and cronies, I REFUSE to use the letter bet*een "V" and "X".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. No, pierogi are either little ravioli-looking things made by Polish people
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 02:42 PM by bean fidhleir
or larger sausage-roll-looking things made by Ukrainians/Belorussians/Russians.

The Polish ones are generally stuffed with shredded cabbage and the UBR ones with minced animal flesh (eeuw)

Na zdorovie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #33
67. Well in Pa, the perogis are filled with
leftovers, in my experience. Sometimes potato, sometimes sauerkraut, sometimes meat, sometimes a combination.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
84. No, those are peroshki
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #84
85. That's just the Russian diminutive of pirogi - though admittedly more often used
for that particular delicacy. piroshki s myasom (meat - eeuw), piroshki s kapustoj (cabbage), piroshki s kartofelom (tatties)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
83. mmm, perogies. what i miss about my native state.
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 04:47 PM by kineta
fried perogies at diners. no diners worth their salt in the pacific northwest.

oh yeah. and tasty cakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #83
87. Tasty Kake and pierogies (best with fried onions)--I smell someone from western PA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-05-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #87
88. Nope. Eastern PA.
Long line of 'PA Dutch' German ancestors on my mother's side ;-)

I haven't had a tasty kake in YEARS. They probably don't taste as wonderful as I remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. He can run but he can't hide
They'll take him down later then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Which is my only point.
Go liberal - unite and get rid of Harper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not really comparable...
Bush will be gone (hopefully in a cage in the Hague) in less than 2 months.

Fear not...the light will shine again very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. That's what happens when you have a monarch as your head of state.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Queen Elizabeth II runs the show.
Canada is a Constituional Monarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. huh?
Are you backwards? Ive never seen a Queen in the House of Commons making legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Huh?
Do you know what a Governor-General actually does? Did you read the article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yes, she symbolically pretends to represent the crown...
But in reality, thats just tradition and she does what the Prime Minister and Canada wants, or acts within precedent/tradition/law. No Queen calls the shots in Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. If it's just tradition then why even have such titles?
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 12:49 PM by arcadian
:shrug:

And apparently she does(run the country) , if the Governor-General can make such decisions as discussed in the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Why even have tradition?
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 12:54 PM by Oregone
Who knows? Some people find comfort in such. Its part of their national identity.

And no, the Queen doesn't run Canada. The GG doesn't act on her behalf, in reality. The Queen is some woman who lives in a fancy house on the other side of the world who makes PR statements. She doesn't much have time to call any shots in any government, being that she is too busy dodging paparazzi and hosting balls.

Canada has a Parliament. Thats where the shots are called.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Reread the article.
again and again and again and again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I already get the whole damn thing
NO QUEEN RUNS ANYTHING IN CANADA, PERIOD, END OF STORY.

Whats so hard for you to understand about that? Read a little bit about Canada and how they operate. Yes, the GG has responsibilities that include determining how the government forms and functions, but she does not act within the interests of the Queen at all.

huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Oh yeah, I'm sure Queen Elizabeth II is a completely disinterested party in this whole matter.
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 01:19 PM by arcadian
:eyes:

Even though the Governor-General who acts on her behalf essentially overturned an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Overturned an election?!? What the hell are you talking about?
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 01:40 PM by Oregone
No election was overturned. There was an election in October. Harper won a minority government with 37% of the vote (no coalition alternative was offered at the time and his party had the most seats). Since then, Harper is losing the confidence of the House of Commons with his budget, which hasn't even been voted on yet (and until it is, he still is the Prime Minister). All he did here was delayed the confidence vote so he can come up with a budget people will vote for, so he can retain confidence. No election was overturned. Do you even know what the fuck is going on?

And yes, the Queen is completely separated from this matter, and far to busy drinking wine and eating brie. She is purely a traditional aspect. The Prime Minister tells the Queen who to make the Governor General (so he essentially does it). The Prime Minister tells the Governor General who to appoint to posts (so he essentially does it). The Queen has never intervened in Canadian politics, and refusals to go along with the Prime Minister are unheard of (its symbolic power that is not used, and would probably not be recognized if it was). The only time a GG really went against the PM was the King-Byng Affair in the 20's, and it had nothing to do with the monarch. If the Queen ever interjected herself into Canadian politics, Canada would quickly and swiftly tell them to get lost. These pleasantries are just procedural traditions, and so long as everything continues to function in the interest of Canadians, they will continue to exist. Otherwise, they will go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Except your Queen
You know, the one named elizabeth and she lives in England. has a son named Charles. You really should read up on that sort of thing. (She also runs a religion, and if you guys want some sort of religious looney who thinks God gave her special powers to boss people around, be my guest.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. The Queen is as backwards as the Tsar of old times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Look, the US is far more run by a monarchial system than Canada
Period.

Britney Spears has more political influence and power, as well as noteworthiness, in Canada than the Queen of England.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Except Britney is not our Head of State - you guys have the Queen
Why you want to give taxes to one of the richest women in the world is beyond me.

Listen: I did not make up this crazy system. I do not support this system. You guys obviously like it or it would be done away with a long time ago. We fought a war over it (and, BTW, the Canadians fought against us so it is obvious Canadians will fight and die for their right to prostrate themselves before their betters in England.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Don't forget the Canadians who have been sacrificed on the alter of the British Empire.
From Natal to Bombay, from Burma to the fields of Flanders, their blood has been shed for King and country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Loyal subjects, the lot of them
I suppose they must like being walking organ banks for the British Royal Family. Need a kidney, guvn'r?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. Here is an agit-prop video I found that tries to explain the revolution to current subjects
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAu0YnJOKas

Notice how they make sure to put it in a setting that the Queen's subjects would be familiar with.
May the lessons help them to throw off their shackles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. You complete ignorance, lack of understanding, and unwillingness to understand...
demonstrates the utter decline of America, on a intellectual and diplomatic level. It reminds me why it is there that I do not want to be when the rubble falls.

And just operating upon the premise that the Queen runs Canada, is that such a bad thing if the real life manifestations are a stable banking system, not engaging in preemptive war with Iraq, and a universal Health Care system? That doesn't seem so bad. Enjoy your Budweiser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Trade liberty for free prostate exams? No thanks.
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 03:04 PM by AngryAmish
on edit:

It is clear you know who your betters are. Congrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Thats a trade I will take....
Because how free is someone who cannot afford their health care, who is losing their home, their job, their retirement, and whose government coffers are being raided by the ruling elite? If that is freedom, I will pass, and I will enjoy my prostate exam.

And who would my "betters" be, mind you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Your betters are the British Royal Family - remember the Queen is your Head of State
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. My betters are no one...
Where I was born, it is written "That all men are create equal". Unfortunately that wasn't really practice there, but unable to reconcile this false notion with my surrounding reality, I sought out a land where that notion was closer to the truth.

The Queen has never interjected into Canadian politics. Any power she has is symbolic, being that if she attempted to exercise any of it, she would no longer be in the picture. Thats the end of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. How much in taxes do you claim Canada gives to the Queen?
You're so sure it happens - name the amount.

And I'd back the Canadian record in wars over the US, by the way - quick into WW2, stayed out of Vietnam and Iraq. Canadians actually seem to have some judgement when it comes to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. Canadians show no judgement because the Queen runs them all...
Parliament is just a Monarch puppet show. They are reading scripted lines written in England. Its all a symbolic process in which they follow the crown's every request. Every Canadian has a picture of the Queen on their TV stand, and they practice their 15 Minutes of Love nightly in front of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #37
60. Leave Britney ALONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. Show some respect for your sovereign!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I have no sovereign....I spit on yours, and all others.
But Canada, as a whole, is a sovereign nation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Your sovereign is the queen, nyah nyah nyah. Enjoy being a subject.
Long live the republic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. Being that personally, I choose where and how I live...
I honestly have no sovereign.

But Id rather live with Universal Health Care in a national among the highest in intergenerational mobility (the true American Dream), than be stuck amongst a declining society with the lowest mobility rate, controlled by corporatist, laissez faire capitalist, and religious fundamentalist whose only contribution to the illusion of a meritocracy was being born to rich daddies, which is no contribution at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. You do so have a sovereign. She is Elizabeth and she PWNS you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Surely you jest...
Her picture is not on my Passport. Is that next to the Eagle on the front?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. She is still your sovereign, and you are her subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. As much as she is yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Wrong. She is not sovereign to me. She is sovereign over a foreign realm, not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Strange....
Because I was just presuming we had the same Passport, yet I am her subject and not you.

Anyway, this is all silly talk. If it takes a Queen to create a society that doesn't engage in preemptive wars today, has among the highest rate of upward mobility, has a stable banking system, and has Universal Health Care, Ill take it. Enjoy your Revolution....hope it makes you feel fuzzy inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. You're the one going around acting like you're a Canadian now. If that is so, she is your sovereign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Acting like a Canadian?!?
...by explaining the system? You got to be kidding me.

And who fucking cares? Again, Queen or no Queen, is it such a bad thing if what if produces is Canada (as opposed to the US)?

Ill take 5 Queens, 3 Kings, a Joker, a Prime Minister with a Helmet haircut if the alternative was what is happening in the US as of late. But the reality is that it is erroneous to blame this action on the Queen, just as it is erroneous to imply she has any part in Canadian politics other than smiling their way from time to time ceremoniously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. By you talking about how much you prefer living there, one is led to believe you are naturalizing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. One may be correct....
How can I say no to such a society? If it changes, I will move and immigrate elsewhere, in the interests of my family. No sweat off my back, but I'm as free as they come.

Im not sure precisely how that changes the underlying matters at all. There exists a Queen, but she has never interjected into Canadian politics, ever. Her role is ceremonial, purely. Most Canadians don't give two shits about it. You hear far more about the royal family on E! television in the States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #63
69. Hold On There, You Canadian, You!
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 03:40 PM by zorahopkins
"Ill take 5 Queens, 3 Kings, a Joker, a Prime Minister with a Helmet haircut if the alternative was what is happening in the US as of late."

"*hat is happening in the US of late"?????

I'll remind you that *E just elected Barak Obama as our leader.

Note: In protest of the continuing occupation of OUR *hite House by the illegal and totally corrupt Bush/Cheney regime of thugs and cronies, I REFUSE to use the letter bet*een "V" and "X".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. ooooooh yay, redemption!
In a single act of realizing how fucked the American people truly are, due to their own actions, they have wiped clean the slate of the last few decades. "The clouds will part, the angels will sing..."

To be honest, Im taking a whole "wait and see" approach to the matter. The political spectrum in the US is so far right of center, I am not sure what to expect (he is not FDR or Truman). It is yet to be seen, exactly what the US will become, if anything different. But I assure, change does not come quick and decisively, at all. Truman still has not seen, over half a century later, his health care reforms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Leave Truman ALONE!
First, Britney, and no* Harry Truman!

My God, Harry Truman has been dead since about 1972!

Please -- just leave Harry Truman alone.

He (and his *ife and daughter, too) have suffered enough.

Note: In protest of the continued occupation of OUR *hite House by the illegal and totally corrupt Bush/Cheney regime of thugs and cronies, I REFUSE to use the letter bet*een "V" and "X">
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. *e *ill never think Truman is *orthy!
*e all know that Karl Marx's spirit calls all the shots. Truman is a puppet and Marx *as his sovereign. Submit to your real leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Truman "IS" A Puppet?
Ummmm..

You are a*are, I trust, that Harry Truman died several years ago.

And I prefer to feel that Groucho Marx's (or perhaps Harpo's) spirit calls all the shots.

Note: I protest of the continuing occupation of OUR *hite House by the illegal and totally corrupt Bush/Cheney regime of thugs and cronies, I REFUSE (and I'm VERY glad to see that you, too, REFUSE) to use the letter bet*een "V" and "X".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. He is every bit alive as...
The Queen controls Canada.

If if hears any different from you, he will be rolling over in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. Moi? Me?
(Note that in conformity with Canadian la*, I title this post in both Francais and Anglais).

I have never suggested that the Queen controls Canada.

(Although I suppose it is possible that some queen has had some influence up there, but that's just a guess.)

Note: In protest of the continuing occupation of OUR *hite House by the illegal and totally corrupt Bush/Cheney regime of thugs and cronies I REFUSE (and it saddens me greatly to see that you no longer refuse) to use the letter bet*een "V" and "X".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. Is that a typo in your title?
:)

It looks funny to a strict Anglophone.

Yeah, I was just using your comment to participate further in this whole silly sub-thread.

And no, I'm not sure, at least in modern times, the monarch has had a bit of influence in Canadian politics. The only time I see that the representative to the crown (Governor General) ever denied a request by the Prime Minister was in 1920, and he did so without a single consultation with England. Their supposed representative acts within legal and precedented constraints. Their main function, philosophically, is really to stave off the threat of a tyrannical Prime Minister, rather than express the wishes of the Queen. Its sad that so many comment without understanding the nuances of the system. I honestly don't think Americans do nuance well. I'm often loss by the statesmanship and intricacies of some of these foreign governments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #56
66. I LOVE ELizabeth!
I am a citizen of the USA, but I just LOVE Queen Elizabeth!

She is so gracious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. I don't give a damn about her...
As a US Citizen or a Canadian Permanent Resident, she doesn't mean a damn thing to me. I find some disdain in the entire system that allows one to be born with such privilege, but it seems this is something humans dig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
40. IIRC the constitution forbids her to enter the house of commons, so that's a non-starter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bean fidhleir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #40
86. She's not forbidden, just forbidden without permission
So, pro-forma, she petitions 3 times and they say No twice. At least that's what I seem to recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Death to the monarchy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. Don't worry, we can invade you.
You will throw flowers, and we'll be greeted as liberators. You can expect a little looting; these things happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. LOL. Please don't
I'm just starting to enjoy not being ruled by Americans. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. But look at our track record!
Iraq, now THERE'S a marvelous case of democracy and...and..uh...never mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
30. pssst....this ISN'T canada.
they have different rules and a different government. if he did everything according to their laws and rules- why does it bother you so? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
35. Um, isn't that permissible under the rules of the Parliamentary system?
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 02:49 PM by impeachdubya
If so, it may suck, but there's nothing 'scary' about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
72. COUP, COUP I TELL YOU!!!
The Queen, Harper, and Margret Thatcher usurped Canadian power!!! Coup! Bush will do it soon with the help of Putin and Stalin, and implement a socialistic parliamentary system! Be afraid, very afraid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. You're Prefectly Correct, You Kno*
You *ere the one who said (say it outloud) "Coup Coup".

Note: In protest of the continuing occupation of OUR *hite House by the illegal and totally corrupt Bush/Cheney regime of thugs and cronies, I REFUSE to use the letter bet*een "V" and "X".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #72
79. How come yesterday you were trying to tell us how big this was, and now suddenly it's no big deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. There is no contradiction....
It is a big deal to the US if their number 1 trading partner has their government drastically re-align to a government with different ideas on trade, foreign relations, global warming, military intervention...etc (as I said yesterday).

Today the PM delayed that vote of confidence to January 20th or so, which the OP is equating to some type of a radical coup-like power grab. Rather, its just a procedural delay of the inevitable (or a delay until the conservative party starts bowing down to the liberals demands). Today isn't some radical, mind-blowing coup. It is a big deal, in that the PM is delaying the vote over partisan politics to keep his job, but it isn't some crushing blow to democracy.

This is all part of a process that can have far reaching effects, but it is not a part that has the significance the OP is suggesting. It is not comparable to Bush taking power through a state of emergency, nor does it suggest he will. This is just a part of the big picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
62. Ummm, no it didn't...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
78. Frightened? Of what? Bush can't wait to get out.
That pathetic drunken little frat boy never worked a day in his life. He thought the Presidency was going to be a walk in the park. Now all he can do is bow out while stammering lame excuses for not taking responsibility for anything he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #78
82. Then he can start making shitty private speeches
And getting paid millions from the special interests that he rewarded with policies and contracts. Yeah, thats how it works. They all do it. Laundered, legal payoffs for political favors. Bush can't wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC