Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The smartest and most effective way free up money for these financial 'rescues' is to exit Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:25 PM
Original message
The smartest and most effective way free up money for these financial 'rescues' is to exit Iraq
. . . the sooner the better.

I'm surprised there's not more talk about this from the Obama transition. That was one of the main points in Mr. Obama's closing arguments during the campaign; that we were paying for things there while the Iraqi government was sitting on a surplus.

That's also an argument against any further mission for our troops in Iraq as the talk from the transition team has been recently. The heir apparent to Gates' position at the Pentagon was quoted as predicting as many as 50,000 'residual' troops remaining to do Cheney knows what.

When we do get the call that the withdrawal is underway and substantial, that's when the U.S. economy will start looking forward and up - but not until then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. All the Iraq money has been off the books /"supplemental"/ "borrowed".
If Iraq goes away it just goes away, there isn't leftover money unless Iraq starts paying us back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. there's money going out every month
what's already appropriated for future spending would be halted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You assume they would just start borrowing that money for another
purpose. Unless it's a "national security" purpose it isn't by any means a seamless transfer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. of course they'll borrow money for something else
hopefully it won't be for more militarism. But, most of the strain on the federal budget, outside of the debt, is coming from Pentagon expenditures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very true
The speed of Iraqi exit should be limited only by the obligations webhave to ensure the safety of our folks and those who helped us. The costs of that boondoggle are vastly underestimated most often. Nobody remembers to include contractors and increased maintenance, repair and so on. We would still have an army of course an no doubt a high defense budget, but we need not have Blackwater mercenaries and $20 a gallon halliburton gas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama will likely not talk about this until he has some better numbers
...as others have noted, nobody knows how much we are spending there, so Obama can't know how much will come available as we withdraw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC