The smartest and most effective way free up money for these financial 'rescues' is to exit Iraq
. . . the sooner the better.
I'm surprised there's not more talk about this from the Obama transition. That was one of the main points in Mr. Obama's closing arguments during the campaign; that we were paying for things there while the Iraqi government was sitting on a surplus.
That's also an argument against any further mission for our troops in Iraq as the talk from the transition team has been recently. The heir apparent to Gates' position at the Pentagon was quoted as predicting as many as 50,000 'residual' troops remaining to do Cheney knows what.
When we do get the call that the withdrawal is underway and substantial, that's when the U.S. economy will start looking forward and up - but not until then.
The speed of Iraqi exit should be limited only by the obligations webhave to ensure the safety of our folks and those who helped us. The costs of that boondoggle are vastly underestimated most often. Nobody remembers to include contractors and increased maintenance, repair and so on. We would still have an army of course an no doubt a high defense budget, but we need not have Blackwater mercenaries and $20 a gallon halliburton gas.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.