Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russian analyst predicts the collapse and breakup of the United States.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:32 PM
Original message
Russian analyst predicts the collapse and breakup of the United States.
Edited on Sat Dec-06-08 01:33 PM by roamer65
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nah. A breakup idea is silly.
He's clearly seeing things through "Soviet Union" style glasses because of their history. I just don't see the same impetus for breakaway regions here, no matter how bad things get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is what I've been worried about for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I've been thinking about this since the end of the 1980s
You don't promote the breakup of other countries without giving the same ideas to your own secessionists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wouldn't be surprised. But then I read science fiction.... ;->
Way too much of it is rather depressing and rather believable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VADem11 Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah right
Edited on Sat Dec-06-08 02:08 PM by VADem11
If the country didn't end up splitting permanently during the Civil War, it's not going to break up now. The six regions he defines make no sense at all. He honestly thinks that there will be a country composed of the Northern states because of strong Canadian influence and that Asian Americans will take over the west coast? The analyst is full of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. It did. That's why there was a civil war. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VADem11 Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Not permanently though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. No, the north subjugated and brutalized the south and forced them back under our control.
144 years later, they still resent it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. The South got what it deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. and we've been paying for it ever since. How do you think it's working out? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I'd say it working out great. Thanks.

There's always consequences that the victor has to deal with.

One is listening to the second guessers and hand wringers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Really? Don't know whether you've been paying attention, but things have not been
"working out great". Much, if not most, of our political insanity is because of the resentment many southerners feel over that debacle.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I guess I have been paying attention.

What turned the South ruby red Republican was LBJ's great society.

Perhaps you should brush up on your history. ;D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. A link.
http://www.counterpunch.org/gray12112004.html


How the South Became Republican: It's About Race

By HEATHER GRAY

The South has now shifted from being the conservative Democratic stronghold to a Republican base and southern politicians bring the baggage of excessively conservative social and greedy irresponsible economic policies into the Republican fold. Interestingly, it was the Republican Abraham Lincoln's presidential elections in 1860 and 1864 and the Democrat Lyndon Johnson's election to the White House a century later in 1964 that rallied the Southern politicians to enforce their conservative and segregationist stronghold. Race has always been at the core of Southern politics and the South has always closed ranks against any efforts for equality. This, in spite of the fact that it was a "white" Democratic southern politician, Lyndon Johnson, who passed the most important civil rights legislation in the country's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Try the Civil Rights Act. That was the whole reason behind the southern strategy.
The course we chose, fighting the war to force them to stay, resulted in the animosity and bedrock racism that personifies the south to this day.

I think it is you that needs to think about the consequences of historic events. You might also want to look at the consistent results of using violence to impose your will on others.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Don't cry too hard on your pillow tonight. Okay?
Edited on Sat Dec-06-08 08:23 PM by MUAD_DIB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Wow, what an ingenious reply. Perhaps Glossu Rabban would be a more apt handle for you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Thanks! Looks like you aren't babbling about the South any longer. ;D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Way too much vodka talking there for me
to hear any of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. "a central state with a large Native American population"?
Since there are only about 1.9 million Native Americans scattered across the entire nation how can there be a central state with a "large" Native American population? Sorry, I don't buy any of this. This "analyst" should stick with Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. He couldn't possibly have an agenda or ulterior motives, right?
Prof Panarin, who has written several books about "information warfare", also forecast that America would no longer be "the world's financial regulator", instead replaced by China and Russia.


"Alaska could be claimed by Russia, he said, claiming that the region was "only granted on lease, after all".


Just sayin'

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Does he know this because he can see Alaska from his back yard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. If the Republicans had managed to stay in power, no outcome
would be too grim or too implausible. If you had told me back in 1999 that George Bush's idiot son would steal the presidency, bankrupt the country, subvert the Constitution, wreck the economy, invade two countries without winning either war, and allow a handful of Saudi lunatics to successfully attack the U.S. mainland, I would have asked you what you were taking and where I could get some. Fortunately for all of us, we will shortly be the beneficiaries of regime change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. "attempt to"; it's not bankrupt yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's projecting. He's assuming a similiarity between the US and the Soviet Union
that simply doesn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
39. The only commonality I see is bloated military budget, an overextended military, and huge debts.
Beyond that, there's no similarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, we could auction Alaska to China and Russia ... highest bidder.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. Some far-fetched ideas. But it does raise interesting thoughts about the possibility of
the country being regioned into sections for easier DHS security beginning at the fast approaching catastrophic depression. Out of that could come a brand new America(s).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. Good. I hope my state of WA merges with British Columbia n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. Texas is the only state that can legally secede.
Edited on Sat Dec-06-08 04:09 PM by girl gone mad
I can see a movement for secession here, since our economy seems to be doing better than others at present. I don't know how successful or popular it would be, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Gotta link for that?
:shrug:

I've heard that claim before, but it seems there is no factual basis for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
28. A homogenized language and culture does a lot to keep a large population together.
Neither of which the Soviet Union had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. This guy needs to put down the fucking vodka for a while.
What a dip shit this "analyst" is. And quite the racist, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
30. FarLeftRage's analysis says Russia will breakup and collapse
Edited on Sat Dec-06-08 07:34 PM by FarLeftRage
Russia is not a uniform nation, but rather made up of of many diffrent European and Asiatic mini-states.
They have no common language, no common religon and no common national interests...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-06-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
32. Will he next tell us how Red Dawn will happen for real one day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. 'america would no longer be "the world's financial regulator", instead replaced by China and Russia'
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Maybe china. But Russia's got a loooong way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mendocino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
36. I've always hoped for a Great Lakes Basin Nation.
We can call it Waterstan.

Besides I can almost see Windsor from my House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
37. So.... Texas takes the deep South and
does what? Can't for see the East Coast breaking from the Mid West nor the West Coast doing something similar. So that would leave Texas and the Southern States. Florida wouldn't go, which ties in the Carolina's and Georgia in. So you would have a nation with ports on the Gulf. Seems a bit risky and costly. You would have Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, then what? Try to pick off Arkansas? Tennessee? Kentucky? Would the Japanese automakers with facilities in the South want to risk increased export tariffs?

Just some random thoughts, but it doesn't seem to be a logical conclusion without a great deal of divisive rhetoric from internal sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tabasco_Dave Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
38. My Magic Eight ball can make better predictions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC