Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Caroline Kennedy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:11 PM
Original message
Sen. Caroline Kennedy
According to a New York Post report Sunday, Senator Ted Kennedy is reportedly supporting his niece as the replacement choice for Hillary Clinton in the Senate.

The 51 year-old daughter of President John F. Kennedy has reportedly spoken with New York Gov. Patterson about the position and is said to be favored for the two-year appointment.

An early backer of the candidacy of the new president - equating his character and qualifications to that of her famous father's - Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg has demonstrated her willingness to stand up in Congress, if appointed, in defense of Democratic values and initiatives with the publication of her 1991 book, 'In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action', and her 1996 book, 'The Right to Privacy'.

She is the vice chair of The Fund for Public Schools and a member of the national board of directors for the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund.

She helped raise over $65 million for the city’s public schools during her tenure (2002-2004) as the chief executive for the Office of Strategic Partnership for the New York City Department of Education.

Mrs. Kennedy also served as a member of the advisory committee vetting vice presidential nominees for Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

Sen. Caroline Kennedy. I like the sound of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kudos to Caroline
I think she will make a great Senator. Do you think she will run for election in 2 years, or has she agreed to keep the seat warm for someone else in 2010?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think we'll have to see how effective she is there
I like her measured tone and the way that she speaks from the heart. We'll have to wait and see how that measures up in terms of initiatives and support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titus Andronicus Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Caroline Kennedy? Thanks But No Thanks
Caroline Kennedy? Thanks But No Thanks
By: Jane Hamsher Sunday December 7, 2008 8:00 am

http://firedoglake.com/2008/12/07/caroline-kennedy-thanks-but-no-thanks/
"Everyone seems to be salivating because Caroline Kennedy called David Patterson and is apparently interested in the Senate seat being vacated by Hillary Clinton.

It's a truly terrible idea.

Her leadership could have been really helpful when the rest of us were trying to keep the progressive lights on and getting the stuffing beaten out of us by a very well-financed right wing for the past eight years. But when things were tough, she was nowhere to be found.

Now that the Democrats are in power, she'd like to come in at the top. We have absolutely no idea if she's qualified, or whether she can take the heat of being a Kennedy in public life. She's certainly shown no appetite for it in the past. She'll have a target on her back and if she can't take it, if she crumbles, she will become a rallying point that the right will easily organize around.

The woman has never run for office in her life. We have no idea how she'd fare on the campaign trail, or how well she could stand up to the electoral process. She simply picks up the phone and lets it be known that she just might be up for having one of the highest offices in the land handed to her because -- well, because why? Because her uncle once held the seat? Because she's a Kennedy? Because she took part as a child in the public's romantic dreams of Camelot? I'm not quite sure...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. _
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. ......
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I didn't find much there except for the 'experience' argument
and the resentment of some 'entitlement' she would supposedly be getting out of this.

I think she's demonstrated enough of a commitment to public service and Democratic principles in her life's work to make her appointment much more than an entitlement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titus Andronicus Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Would you feel the same if she wasn't a Kennedy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. you mean like if she had an out of the body experience?
. . . and wasn't Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg?

Spooky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titus Andronicus Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Your answer is pretty clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. yep, she's all I stated above
. . . and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. If she was not a Kennedy, we wouldn't be talking about it.
She would not be considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titus Andronicus Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Caroline campaigned in '04 with Chelsea and the Kerry daughters. So, there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Respectfully, that's not a good argument against Caroline running for senator.
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 07:51 PM by 8_year_nightmare
But I appreciate the fact that I learned from your post that Caroline picked up the phone to initiate the idea. There aren't enough Kennedys involved in the government, as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. When I look at the current crop...my own Senators Cornyn and Hutchison for example
and I have to ponder what type of "experience" they have that is valuable to ME?
What about those fools from Oklahoma?
The list really goes on and on of Senators that make you wonder how the fuck they got to be where they are and leave you scratching your head "Why" are they there?
Along the same lines, having Caroline run for the Senate makes me ask "WHY NOT"?
There is NOT one good reason she shouldn't.
She interned for her Uncle Teddy and graduated from Harvard and got her law degree from Columbia.
From 2002 to 2004, Kennedy worked as chief executive for the Office of Strategic Partnerships for the New York City Department of Education. During this time, she helped raise more than $65 million for the city’s public schools.
I'm sorry...but I am totally lost at your query of wondering "if" she is qualified, when her resume is head and shoulders ABOVE many of the ones who are currently serving in the Senate.
But...thanks for your "concern".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think she is an outstanding choice.
I heard some naysayer jerk on TV say she "wasn't qualified".... Thanks for listing some of her accomplishments, which certainly proves him wrong.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. The New York Post? Have they ever been right about anything?
Who owns it?

It ain't gonna happen. Nice dream, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. I've got Paterson's back no matter his choice but
would love for Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg to be a U.S. Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. There has only been one Kennedy Presidency,
and it was far too short.

The others tried, but tragedy struck at different levels.

This is a squeaky Clean Kennedy not of Washington.

Considering some of what we have in the Senate now,
She would be a breath of fresh air.
In two years, folks can then decide if she did the job,
and re-elect her if they chose, or give it to another candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RhodaGrits Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. She'd be my Senator and I'd be absolutely delighted. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. From someone who just got saddled with 6 more years of SAXBY...
I'd gladly claw someone's eyes out for Caroline to be my senator.

Y'all need to quit your bitchin'. She's a fine Democrat and obviously supports our new president's agenda. One more vote is one more vote on the senate floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titus Andronicus Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Umm.. no one is suggesting a repug for the slot.
It will be a Democrat 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Welllllll,,,,,,, Pataki or Bruno are not doing anything at the moment.
Edited on Sun Dec-07-08 09:37 PM by whistler162
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RubyDuby in GA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. No? Really. I'm only saying that everyone is complaining that she's not this or she's not that
At least she is a Democrat, a life-long one at that and the people of New York will be represented well if she were to take this seat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-07-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. Caroline is OK. kick + recommend n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. What's her name? Kennedy or Schlossberg?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Never changed her name when she married Schlossberg.

"Although she is often incorrectly referred to as "Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg", she did not change her name when she married."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-08-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Thanks....... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC