Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So are Hermaphrodites allowed under the law to marry either sex?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:42 PM
Original message
So are Hermaphrodites allowed under the law to marry either sex?
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 08:16 PM by Quixote1818
I was just watching Jon Steward demolish Mike Huckabee http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/10/jon-stewart-mike-huckabee_n_149906.html on the subject of Gay Marriage and I thought it would have been interesting if Stewart had asked him what the Bible said about someone being a Hermaphrodite and who they could marry. I wonder how Huckabee would have responded to that angle? He probably would have simply said the Bible doesn't address Hermaphrodites.

It just goes to show that if nature can produce a person who is both male and female physically then the likely hood of nature producing a person who is physically one sex but mentally attracted to the same sex would be extremely high. Based on science I would think the fact that there are Hermaphrodites would be conclusive evidence that nature produces all kinds of amazing physically and emotionally unique people who can be attracted to either their own sex, the opposite sex, both sexes and maybe even someone who is both sexes.

Here is another angle to hit them with. Some lizard species such as the New Mexico Whiptail, have only females and have no males yet they can reproduce. Kind of puts a kink in the argument that nature intends there to always be a father and a mother. See link about these lizards here: http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/expeditions/treasure_fossil/Treasures/Unisexual_Whiptail_Lizards/lizards.html?50

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kayakjohnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice. Very nice. And don't even go down the earthworm road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Outstanding point.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayakjohnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hey, I'm guessing you're a fumesucker because you ride the recumbent.
Is that a fair deduction? Cheers to you if so. Cool. Well, not the fume part, but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Good guess... But wrong..
Thanks to medical bills I doubt we will ever pay off we're sucking financial fumes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Flaw in the argument
There is no such thing as a true human hermaphrodite, one with functioning reproductive organs of both genders. So nature has not in fact produced such a person. You're not likely to make much ground wielding a completely fictional argument, sticking to facts you can back up is better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayakjohnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm not so sure if you or we know that your statement is true. Could you pop us a link, by chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Is this person a flaw?
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 07:54 PM by Lint Head
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The argument still holds. This is not about the production of babies but sexual attraction
Edited on Thu Dec-11-08 08:12 PM by Quixote1818
Most Hermaphrodites (correction Intersexed people not Hermaphrodites) don't have reproductive function of either organ but they still have sexual attraction to one or both sexes. So, what would the states stance be on who they should be able to marry regardless of their ability to produce children?

Also, here is an example of "True hermaphroditism" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex

With some conditions of intersex, even the chromosomal sex may not be clear. A "true hermaphrodite" is defined as someone with both male gonadal tissue (testes) and female gonadal tissue (ovarian tissue).

In 2004, researchers at UCLA published their studies of a lateral gynandromorphic hermaphroditic bird, which had a testicle on the right and an ovary on the left. Its entire body was split down the middle between male and female, with hormones from both gonads running through the blood.<39>

This extreme example of hermaphroditism is quite rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. you are mistaken
I personally know someone born with functioning male and female anatomy and could technically self reproduce. Even the bladder was connected via 2 urethra, one to each genital. Surgery was done to remove the male organs when she was 2. She is now outwardly a female but self identifies in private only as a man and if money were available would have sex reassignment surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hermaphrodites is an offensive (and inaccurate) term. You're thinking of intersexed people, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wow. Learn something new every day. Thanks for the correction.


I looked it up and it seems you are correct. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I did some coursework in Human Sexuality a while back though my school's Psych dept.
Interesting stuff. We talked quite a bit about the intersection between gender and sex (two completely different concepts) and how people relate to each.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Someone I know just had a sex change
He went from a he to a she. He was born Michael but is now Michelle.

What I find interesting is that when he was Michael, he was not allowed to marry his boyfriend, but now that she is Michelle she IS able to marry her boyfriend! Mind you, this is in Florida which bans same-sex marriage!

I wonder what the fundies have to say about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I have a friend who did it the other way around
She's M-F transgendered. She and her wife were married when she was male.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. In Utah can they marry both at the same time?
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC