Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GM to temporarily close 21 factories to cut 250,000 vehicles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:58 PM
Original message
GM to temporarily close 21 factories to cut 250,000 vehicles
Please be aware that when the White House taps into the TARP fund to bailout the auto companies, it will set a precedent. It will give them authority to to tap into the rest of it. Congress should not surrender their authority in this matter. Just saying. As usual, the White House is up to no good.
========================

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/12/gm_to_cut_250000_vehicles_from.php

<snip>
General Motors Corp. says it will cut another 250,000 vehicles from its first-quarter production schedule by temporarily closing 21 factories across North America.

The move affects most plants in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Many will be shut down for the whole month of January.

Spokesman Tony Sapienza said normal production would be around 750,000 cars and trucks for the quarter.

GM and nearly all automakers who sell in the U.S. are mired in the worst sales slump in 26 years.

Cash-strapped GM is seeking government loans to stay in operation beyond the end of the year. The White House says it may tap the $700 billion Wall Street bailout fund to help GM and Chrysler stay in business after the Senate blocked a measure to provide $14 billion in immediate loans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please, tell me what good will come of letting them fail?
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 01:08 PM by notadmblnd
Be very specific in your answer please.

On edit, if that TARP money had been used like it was supposed to have been; that is freeing up the credit market, the auto makers wouldn't be asking the government for funds because loans would be available via normal channels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will be catastrophic...
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 01:21 PM by kentuck
in my opinion. If the President has hinted that he would agree to using the TARP money, then why doesn't the Congress simply vote to use some of the remaining funds to do that, rather than jump thru hoops and play political games? They have the authority - they just don't know how to use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I can't answer that question. I doubt if the little mionkey has seen the error of his ways
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 01:22 PM by notadmblnd
All I know is that; the republican in congress are traitors and criminals, looking out for foreign interests ahead of America's. Why they are allowed to and go unpunished is truly beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The credit market is not going to "free up"
The problem was that they were giving auto loans to consumers with poor credit.

Losses on auto loans are up.

Creditworthiness of consumers continues to deteriorate.

There is no way that they can sell 17 million cars per year to creditworthy consumers.

The fleet size is about 250,000,000 vehicles. Scrappage is at about 5.6% per year, or 14 million per yar.

But if the fleet size also drops 1% per year (and there are more vehicles than drivers today), that would cut the demand by 2.5 million which drops the demand to 11.5 million. And with tough times, maybe a 1% per year shrinkage in the fleet is too small.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. yep they were giving out loans to the homeless on the streets were they?
Your number one reason is ass backwards. Most of the loans given were to gainfully employed people. many who have lost their jobs. Just as with the housing market, I don't believe for one minute that all these people took out loans for cars or houses with no intention of paying them off. I think job loss is the number one reason people default, not that they're inherently crooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. FICO credt scores required by lenders have gone up; FICO scores of consumers have gone down
Lenders weren't requiring as high FICO scores, since they could package the auto loans up into bonds, dress them up with credit default swap insurance, and sell them off to gullible investors. That racket has stopped, since the investors now realize that the securitized auto loans aren't creditworthy and the insurance companies behind the CDS (think AIG) aren't solvent.

FICO scores of consumers have gone down for a variety of reasons. Job loss is one. Small business owners may be struggling. High prices for gas and heating caused others to increas balances on credit cards or draw on home equity lines of credit. Equity in homes has decreases, so that's a problem with creditworthiness.

It's not just job losses, and the job losses are not isolated to the auto industry. Lots of people in residential construction, real estate, mortgage lending, financial services of all types, etc. have lost jobs.

There are only 70+ thousand UAW employees at GM. Far more financial services employees have lost jobs in the last few months.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You think this will only effect 70 thousand?
Try 4 million. And if you think your job won't be effected, you better think again. What ever industry you work in, you can bet your butt yours will be too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's an idea. Close the Mexican and Canadian plants permanently
and move the jobs back to the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Bingo!
Why couldn't GM think of that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. The Canadian plants are unionized.
Why do you advocate firing union workers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1gobluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. The coldest month of the year -- perfect
Can they humiliate autoworkers any more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. Thanks, Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC