Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The GOP Goes South

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 02:23 AM
Original message
The GOP Goes South
As a rule, a new president's choice of a secretary of transportation makes few headlines, even when the appointee is a member of the opposition. In 2001, George W. Bush decided to name as transportation secretary Norman Mineta, a former representative from California, to be the token Democrat in his Cabinet, and no one noticed. And no one except for Mark Shields, who lavishly praised the appointment, paid much attention last week when Barack Obama made Ray LaHood, the retiring representative from Peoria, Ill., the second Republican in his Cabinet.

This one, however, is loaded with meaning because LaHood is no ordinary member of Congress. He has been, as Shields pointed out, one of the most widely respected members of the House; a leader in the uphill struggle for comity between the parties; and a throwback to the days of his old boss Bob Michel, the minority leader who resisted the scorched-earth tactics of Newt Gingrich. Such was LaHood's reputation for fairness that he was the natural choice to preside over the House during the explosive impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton.

The significance of his accepting Obama's offer goes beyond the signal it sends of the new president's seriousness about outreach to moderate Republicans. As transportation secretary, LaHood will be at the center of the road and bridge construction projects Obama plans to make the highlight of his almost trillion-dollar stimulus program.

All the signs are that the stimulus spending will be opposed by congressional Republicans, whose shrunken ranks are increasingly dominated by right-wing Southerners who care not what their stance does to harm the party's national image.

The spectacle of LaHood facing off in congressional testimony against those naysayers will dramatize a split that is crippling the GOP.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/26/AR2008122601129.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. To answer Broder's closing question ...
...
Will congressional Republicans again sacrifice their political interest to satisfy their Southern-baked ideological imperatives?


Yes, yes, they will.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I am so enjoying them eat each other for lunch
NOM NOM NOM the end of the Rethuglican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Of course, they will blame it on someone else.
And it will be quite fun watching them going down in flames, completely oblivious to what's going on and why--desperately grasping at scapegoats all the way down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. states that oppose a stimulus should have their federal monies cut to match their tax contributions.
and the other states should get their federal monies RAISED to match theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I like the way you think! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Obama, in my opinion, is making GREAT "think 3 moves ahead" decisions.
And NOT for narrow "confound the enemy" partisan reasons, but to bring together as much of this country as can be accomplished by a single administration.

I URGE all others here who've been whipping themselves into a frenzy over a 2 minute invocation, to consider this. Not everything need be considered on "Zero-Sum" lines.

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. thanks for that. My thought too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Exactly. Like a master chess player.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-28-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Any sentence in any mainstream media piece that includes the phrase
"...will dramatize a split that is crippling the GOP" is MORE than okay by me!

The more crippled those bastards are, the longer we'll have to impede their movement's advancement, and reverse what they've done. Hopefully, to help render them set back so far that they will NEVER completely recover. I'd love to see them relegated to minority status for DECADES to come.

I've said it before here and mean it with all my heart - I LOVE-LOVE-LOVE the smell of republi-CONS self-immolating in the morning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Let them become clowns screaming on the street corners for all I care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. A platform based entirely on fantasy is going to lose adherents...
...as the cold realities become tougher to ignore. The Very Best Pretenders will be left in charge of whatever the hell is left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. when implemented, we should allow the southern senators to refuse money for their states
i think then the people would be heard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC