Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Torture prosecutions finally begin in the U.S.-"A flagrant & pernicious abuse of power & authority"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 06:24 PM
Original message
Torture prosecutions finally begin in the U.S.-"A flagrant & pernicious abuse of power & authority"
Edited on Wed Dec-31-08 06:25 PM by kpete
Glenn Greenwald
Wednesday Dec. 31, 2008 07:56 EST
Torture prosecutions finally begin in the U.S.

While fiercely loyal establishment spokespeople such as The Washington Post's Ruth Marcus continue to insist that prosecutions are only appropriate for common criminals ("someone breaking into your house") but not our glorious political leaders when they break the law (by, say, systematically torturing people), the Bush administration has righteously decided that torture is such a grotesque and intolerable crime that political leaders who order it simply must be punished in American courts to the fullest extent of the law . . . . if they're from Liberia:

MIAMI (AP) -- U.S. prosecutors want a Miami judge to sentence the son of former Liberian President Charles Taylor to 147 years in prison for torturing people when he was chief of a brutal paramilitary unit during his father's reign.

Charles McArthur Emmanuel, also known as Charles "Chuckie" Taylor Jr. is scheduled to be sentenced Jan. 9 by U.S. District Judge Cecilia M. Altonaga. His conviction was the first use of a 1994 law allowing prosecution in the U.S. for acts of torture committed overseas.

Even in the U.S., it's hard to believe that federal prosecutors who work for the Bush DOJ were able to convey the following words with a straight face:

A recent Justice Department court filing describes torture - which the U.S. has been accused of in the war on terror - as a "flagrant and pernicious abuse of power and authority" that warrants severe punishment of Taylor.

"It undermines respect for and trust in authority, government and a rule of law," wrote Assistant U.S. Attorney Caroline Heck Miller in last week's filing. "The gravity of the offense of torture is beyond dispute."

more at:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/T/TAYLORS_SON?SITE=ORBAK&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/12/31/torture/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Got to love our 'justice' system..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. If prosecution for torture is good enough for the son of a third world dictator...
I would think it's good enough for our top officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. An anti-gravity population here in the US?
"The gravity of the offense of torture is beyond dispute."

It is a grave error to undermine the rule of law by not even investigating this shameful and provocative business that this administration has endorsed.

The whole darn world is watching the US justice system to see if the president is above the law or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. You still don't understand. Gonzo redifined torture so that bush is in the clear.
Actually, i believe that individual were even interrogated beyond Gonzo's definition. I mean if heavy interrogation brings about death, wouldn't that be considered torture, even by Gonzo's definition????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. IF I can get as lawyer to sign a note saying removing money from a bank with a gun is OK is that
enough to get me out of a bank robbing charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sorry, should have included the "sarcasm" sign. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Once again it doesn't make sense. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC