|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
enough (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:52 PM Original message |
Republicans Demand Holder Promise No Bush Prosecutions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. OH HELL NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. yeah...tell you what....no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. no to what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 07:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. no as in - no promises re: prosecutions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 07:36 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. thanks for clarifying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why would he do that? What are they scared of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. DON'T DO IT, HOLDER!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. It doesn't matter. I heard (KO) from a Constitutional Scholar that Bush could write "SECRET Pardon" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveFool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. That's fine, send them to Europe, then. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:11 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Now that's the sprit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. I've never heard of a secret pardon. ? fwiw, I think the (R)'s are just blowing smoke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prostock69 (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. Yes, but the pardon doesn't work overseas. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
28. I think that Dean wasn't stating the other part of that equation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 07:15 PM Response to Reply #8 |
38. but would it be secret from the new executive branch? if so how would it ever be executed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sutz12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. Well, that pretty much pegs the "D'UH" meter. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
5. Obama won, they lost, fuck that noise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
7. If you have nothing to hide!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
9. Do the Repukes understand that they're admitting guilt? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Exactly. They know that prosecutions are IN ORDER for bushco, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. Holder must promise to uphold the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
11. reTHUGs demand obstruction of justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4 t 4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:59 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. What-no way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
13. does that not make each and every one of them an accomplice after the fact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
15. They are scared that once the American people get a firm grasp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. Bingo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
20. tough shit, boys...ya'll lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
22. Republicans demand...? pfff! - Pelosi Thank gawd diagree's with republican's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fireweed247 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
23. Gee, they all act like he's guilty of something.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
24. LOL. Idiots think any prosecutor would agree to that? See your point on running out the clock though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
25. I would give them the "nuclear option". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wryter2000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
27. Demands? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
30. so they want a promise that Holder will not uphold the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
serrano2008 (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Right on! Holder should say, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
31. so they want a promise that Holder will not uphold the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
32. Go ahead and promise. THEN PROSECUTE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
34. Surely that is not something that he can promise. Surely there are not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. If they band together, they can filibuster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
35. As a condition of approval, he must vow to ignore his duty! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blaze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
36. A delay tactic, just like you said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blaze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 08:45 PM Response to Original message |
41. kick for the evening crowd n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimlup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-23-09 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
42. Not even the furthest rightwing conservative should be confirmed on these terms! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NM Independent (794 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-24-09 03:47 AM Response to Original message |
43. FUCK. OFF. COMPLICIT. BASTARDS. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC