|
I have been hearing on the news that Congressional Republicans are all from safe districts and so they can feel safe in opposing Obama. That didn't ring true to me, so I did some checking to see who might be vulnerable and how vulnerable they are. Of course, there are also Congressional Democrats with the same levels of vulnerability, but the Republicans can figure out who they are themselves.
Level 1 most vulnerable, less than 5% victory margin
Ca 04 - 50-50 Ca 44 - 52-48 La 02 - 49-47 La 04 - 48-48 Mn 06 - 46-44 Mo 09 - 50-47 Ne 02 - 52-48 Pa 06 - 52-48 SC 01 - 52-48 Wa 08 - 52-48
There's 10 who should be most vulnerable and most amenable to working with Obama and Democrats. However, it should go without saying, that I have not lived in most of those districts and so the numbers may not be a true measure of actual vulnerability. Mn 06 for example, was supposed to be a cakewalk until Bachmann got on Hardball and made an a$$ of herself. Will that still be remembered in 2010? Feel free to tell me about the districts you have inside knowledge of.
level 2 slightly less vulnerable, less than 10% victory margin
Al 03 - 53-47 AK 01 - 50-45 Ca 02 - 52-43 Ca 03 - 50-44 Ca 50 - 50-45 Fl 25 - 53-47 IL 10 - 55-45 IL 13 - 53-44 Ks 02 - 51-46 * Ky 02 - 53-47 La 06 - 48-40 Mi 11 - 51-45 Mn 03 - 48-41 Oh 02 - 45-37 SC 02 - 54-46
* denotes a Democratic incumbent defeated unfortunately in my own district. Still there are 15 more who are fairly vulnerable.
Level 3 - a long shot, but still doable in theory, less than 20% victory margin
Az 03 - 54-42 Ca 24 - 58-42 Ca 25 - 58-42 Ca 26 - 53-40 Ca 45 - 57-43 Ca 46 - 53-43 Ca 48 - 56-40 Fl 12 - 58-42 Fl 13 - 55-38 Fl 15 - 53-42 Fl 18 - 58-42 Fl 21 - 58-42 IL 06 - 58-42 In 03 - 55-40 Mi 08 - 57-40 Mn 02 - 57-43 Nv 02 - 52-41 NJ 05 - 56-42 NJ 07 - 51-41 NY 26 - 55-40 NC 05 - 58-42 NC 10 - 58-42 Oh 07 - 58-42 Oh 12 - 55-42 Pa 15 - 59-41 Pa 16 - 56-39 Tx 07 - 56-42 Tx 10 - 54-43 Tx 22 - 53-45 * Tx 24 - 56-41 Tx 32 - 57-41
There's 32 more with at least some vulnerability. That's a total of 57 out of 178 who should be hearing from the Democrats in their district.
|