Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush a 4 letter word at CPAC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 07:19 AM
Original message
Bush a 4 letter word at CPAC
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 07:56 AM by TWiley
oh, so sorry about your pain ...

Bush a 4 letter word at CPAC

Conservatives aren’t sure who’s the Republican presidential frontrunner in 2012. They disagree over how sharply to attack President Barack Obama and on the question of whether a back-to-basics approach is the path back to majority.

But if there’s one thing those attending the annual Conservative Political Action Conference this week agree on, it is this: They don’t want another George W. Bush.

Few come out right out and say it, but they don’t have to. There’s no nostalgia for the past eight years, no tributes to Bush and no sessions dedicated to exploring his presidency.

Indeed, for a president who publicly embraced conservative principles, there is little evidence that the movement returns the sentiment.

When the subject of the 43rd president has come up at CPAC — where he spoke each year of his presidency — it’s usually been in an unflattering context.

Conservative icon Newt Gingrich, the former House Speaker, railed against the “Bush-Obama continuity in economic policy” and the “Bush-Obama big spending program” in a speech Friday.

"We had big spending under Bush and now we have big spending under Obama," Gingrich said. "And so now we have two failures."


Full Story: http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090228/pl_politico/19433

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. So for eight years, they loved him
and now they despise him? What a bunch of total asshole hypocrites. Of course, we all know that fact already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, we need to give them 8 more year to think it over
Lets be helpful and run bush up the flagpole at every opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. They're liars. They love him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RJ Connors Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, seeing how they're not frothing at the mouth over Sarah
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 07:49 AM by RJ Connors
I suppose that is good news as that is sure to aggravate their core base, (religious nut cases). So they will likely stay disorganized for awhile.

In fact Sarah didn't even bother to show, she was busy. I'd be willing to bet she thinks she has 2012 in the bag so why waste her oh so valuable and precious time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. There is a battle brewing between Jindal and Palin
Jindal publicly opposed stimulus money, and specifically cited Volcano Monitoring as Pork. This was a bitch-slap to Sara Palin, and an attempt to make her subordinate to his cause. That money is ear marked for Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RJ Connors Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not really. I saw a straw poll at CPAC
after I posted this and Sarah was in the lead with 29% and Jindel was at 9%, before he gave his rebuttal speech to Obama's speech, which probably puts him at 2% now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC