Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Obama include single payer advocates in the health care debate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 08:49 AM
Original message
Should Obama include single payer advocates in the health care debate?
The president wants this process to be open and transparent, with the goal of achieving universal coverage. However, groups representing physicians, nurses, and consumers who advocate for a single-payer system of national health insurance have thus far been excluded from the summit.

-snip-

Under a single-payer system, doctors, hospitals and other health care providers are paid from a single fund administered by the government. The system would eliminate the wasteful spending and high administrative costs of private insurance, saving almost $400 billion annually. This savings is enough to provide every American with the same high-quality care, including those who currently have insurance but still cannot afford medications and treatment.

-snip-

The Clinton task force on health reform made a similar mistake of excluding the voices of those who support a single-payer system, and the result was a complicated, inadequate reform proposal that catered to the interests of insurance companies and failed to garner public support. At a time when public support for single-payer is greater than ever - more than 60 percent in recent polls - we urge President Obama not to make the same mistake. He must include single-payer advocates in the health care summit next week.

http://www.pnhp.org/news/2009/february/president_obama_must.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the single payer system can save $400 billion annually,then yes!
The system would eliminate the wasteful spending and high administrative costs of private insurance, saving almost $400 billion annually. So what do you say Mr. President? Let's get rid of the waste, and give more access to medical treatment for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. K&R - -"Physicians for a Natl Health Program" - Dr's. Himmelstein & Woodhandler should be INVITED...
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 03:07 PM by Faryn Balyncd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. K&R - - "California Nurse's Association" - - strong Single Payer advocates, should be INVITED.......
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 03:08 PM by Faryn Balyncd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. He Doesn't Even Include American Taxpayers and Medical Consumers!
I call bogus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3.  Health Care Industry in Talks to Shape Policy [SECRET TALKS], NYT


February 20, 2009
Health Care Industry in Talks to Shape Policy
By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON — Since last fall, many of the leading figures in the nation’s long-running health care debate have been meeting secretly in a Senate hearing room. Now, with the blessing of the Senate’s leading proponent of universal health insurance, Edward M. Kennedy, they appear to be inching toward a consensus that could reshape the debate.

Many of the parties, from big insurance companies to lobbyists for consumers, doctors, hospitals and pharmaceutical companies, are embracing the idea that comprehensive health care legislation should include a requirement that every American carry insurance.

.........
The talks, which are taking place behind closed doors, are unusual. Lobbyists for a wide range of interest groups — some of which were involved in defeating national health legislation in 1993-4 — are meeting with the staff of Mr. Kennedy, Democrat of Massachusetts, in a search for common ground.

.................

While President Obama is not directly represented in the talks, the White House has been kept informed and is encouraging the Senate effort as a way to get the ball rolling on health legislation.

...............

“While there was some diversity of views,” it said, “the sense of the room is that an individual obligation to purchase insurance should be part of reform if that obligation is coupled with effective mechanisms to make coverage meaningful and affordable.”

The ideas discussed include a proposal to penalize people who fail to comply with the “individual obligation” to have insurance.

......................................

The 20 people who regularly attend the meetings on Capitol Hill include lobbyists for AARP, Aetna, the A.F.L.-C.I.O., the American Cancer Society, the American Medical Association, America’s Health Insurance Plans, the Business Roundtable, Easter Seals, the National Federation of Independent Business, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and the United States Chamber of Commerce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. There's a lot of secrecy in health care policy. It's too hot a topic. Too wealthy an industry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. If It Was Universal, Single-Payer, This Would Be a Non-Issue
why should we pay insurance companies? Anyone? Bueller?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Because their lobbyists run the system.
The people have no say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. The WH wants universal INSURANCE not universal single-payer. With
his universal insurance-he brings in the insurance INDUSTRY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. The private insurance is the root problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. If the 'sense' of the room is revolving around
the word 'purchase' and 'obligation' then health care reform is dead before it's born.

This is far too important an issue to be decided in secret, by twenty individuals who primarily represent the money-making end of something that shouldn't even be considered a 'business'.

Shameful. Shameful, but not at all surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yes, this is more crony capitalism or corporate socialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. they are lobbyists. simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. Interesting.....
Sounds like the Health Care equivalent of Cheney's Energy Commission.

Personally, I don't understand how they can have an open debate if they don't include all major options including single payer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's where the discussion should START. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. single payer is NOT on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I know. We need it to bring the starting point of discussion further left.
We've got to start making too many Big Concessions BEFORE negotiations even start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. But the Kennedy group is already talking with the insurance industry
--for a few months now. It will be the plan that gets put out there by Congress--that I know. I do not mean to be down about this but can't help it when I see articles such as one I posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. The insurance industry has to get a piece of the pie, because...
it might take some of the fight out of them - I know, naive. It didn't work in '93.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. HR 676 has been proposed out there in Congress longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yes, but it is dusty. and getting dustier.!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. And that's not a good thing. This crap system is going to break many
of us. It will keep unemployment high and discourage entrepreneurship on the local level and has already been doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. ...And that's where the discussion should end
Single payer would provide the largest single stimulus to the American economy period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Worked for me in military medicine and in Ontario. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaygore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
42. I know! It is so obvious and yet the insurance companies seem to dictate
Money speaks and big money speaks the loudest.

We have to put pressure on Congress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. Americans Can't Afford Better Health Care At Far Lower Prices
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 09:20 AM by MannyGoldstein
So stop thinking about it.

Fortunately, Zeke Emanuel and the DLC are looking out for our interests: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=5159769&mesg_id=5159769

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes. Absolutely he should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demodonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
24. Yes. My god, YES! We can't afford NOT to do single-payer.

The only solution that is going to get the job done is SINGLE PAYER HEALTHCARE FOR ALL. Anything else is simply going to continue the greed-driven for-profit "insurance" based system that we all know is not working now.

My God Obama, pay attention to the people not the Pharma lobbyists!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. Single Payer or shelve it
Demanding people pay for insurance is wrong. Extortion. Compelling people to contrubute to the profit of others is called a shake down.
The Insurance Companies ARE the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
46. They require us to have car insurance and home-owners (if financing) insurance.
Edited on Mon Mar-02-09 08:54 AM by Kalyke
I want to say that I'm for single-payer, lock, stock and barrel. There's no other way for the United States to stay economically competitive, or healthy, without it.

However, I just wanted to point out that there is precedent in requiring us to purchase insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. Rec #3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
28. If he doesn't, it's not exactly "open," is it?
It doesn't really matter if he includes them, though, if he has no intention of allowing a single-payer system. Including them at that point is for propaganda purposes, not for substantive reform.

Do you really think he wants a single-payer system?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
44. No it's not open, it's closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. He must include single-payer advocates in the health care summit next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. If he doesn't, he's not serious about moving the HMO's out of the way. . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. INSURANCE COMPANIES designing a healthcare plan = DRUG COMPANIES design the Bush Px Drug Benefit.
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 03:17 PM by Faryn Balyncd

The insurance companies are the problem, not part of the solution.....

Without getting rid of the parasitic insurance companies - - - - & tapping the 31% "administrative costs" that insurance companies charge in order to cherry pick the low risk patients (and dump those with pre-existing conditions, etc onto the backs of the taxpayers and healthcare providers - - - - we will NEVER be able to afford universal healthcare.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. Yes indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. reminds me of the bushgang's energy task force
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 03:24 PM by leftofthedial
everyone is included...


except environmentalists and alternative energy advocates.

Of course, single-payer advocates should be included. In fact, they should be driving the process.

If the insurance companies are enshrined as keepers of our medical system as Obama seems determined to do, we'll be cleaning up this mess in another few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. I used that as an example when I contacted the White House by email
this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
36. Yes! knr n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
37. He will if he's open-minded. / nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
38. These groups need to show up in large numbers outside the summit.
The statements are important but what if he doesn't include them anyway? In politics good things have never happened without popular action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
39. Not just Yes, but Hell Yes!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
40. ABSOLUTELY! If they are not included that tells me our President is scared of Big Medicine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
41. Leaving out Single Payer advocates & appointing a Czar who wants to privatize Medicare !#?#!#?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesquanderer Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
45. Is Elizabeth Edwards invited to the summit? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
48. Don't give me Health Insurance, give me Health Care
Health Insurance is beauracracy.
Health Care is....Health Care.

If there is one thing I am certain of, it's that a paper pusher is much less likely to fix what ails me than a Medical Doctor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC