|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 08:49 AM Original message |
Should Obama include single payer advocates in the health care debate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
1. If the single payer system can save $400 billion annually,then yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
32. K&R - -"Physicians for a Natl Health Program" - Dr's. Himmelstein & Woodhandler should be INVITED... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
33. K&R - - "California Nurse's Association" - - strong Single Payer advocates, should be INVITED....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
2. He Doesn't Even Include American Taxpayers and Medical Consumers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Health Care Industry in Talks to Shape Policy [SECRET TALKS], NYT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:11 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. There's a lot of secrecy in health care policy. It's too hot a topic. Too wealthy an industry. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:13 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. If It Was Universal, Single-Payer, This Would Be a Non-Issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Because their lobbyists run the system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:23 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. The WH wants universal INSURANCE not universal single-payer. With |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 11:56 AM Response to Reply #10 |
25. The private insurance is the root problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enlightenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:30 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. If the 'sense' of the room is revolving around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Yes, this is more crony capitalism or corporate socialism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. they are lobbyists. simple as that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pharlo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 11:46 AM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Interesting..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
4. That's where the discussion should START. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:25 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. single payer is NOT on the table. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:30 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I know. We need it to bring the starting point of discussion further left. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. But the Kennedy group is already talking with the insurance industry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:40 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. The insurance industry has to get a piece of the pie, because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:45 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. HR 676 has been proposed out there in Congress longer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
biopowertoday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:50 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Yes, but it is dusty. and getting dustier.!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 10:34 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. And that's not a good thing. This crap system is going to break many |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kip Humphrey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. ...And that's where the discussion should end |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:41 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Worked for me in military medicine and in Ontario. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kaygore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 04:43 AM Response to Reply #14 |
42. I know! It is so obvious and yet the insurance companies seem to dictate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:19 AM Response to Original message |
8. Americans Can't Afford Better Health Care At Far Lower Prices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
9. Yes. Absolutely he should. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demodonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
24. Yes. My god, YES! We can't afford NOT to do single-payer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
26. Single Payer or shelve it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 08:54 AM Response to Reply #26 |
46. They require us to have car insurance and home-owners (if financing) insurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
area51 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
27. Rec #3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
28. If he doesn't, it's not exactly "open," is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 07:44 AM Response to Reply #28 |
44. No it's not open, it's closed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
29. He must include single-payer advocates in the health care summit next week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
30. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
31. If he doesn't, he's not serious about moving the HMO's out of the way. . .n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
34. INSURANCE COMPANIES designing a healthcare plan = DRUG COMPANIES design the Bush Px Drug Benefit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 06:25 AM Response to Reply #34 |
43. Yes indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
35. reminds me of the bushgang's energy task force |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #35 |
47. I used that as an example when I contacted the White House by email |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slipslidingaway (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
36. Yes! knr n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
37. He will if he's open-minded. / nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
38. These groups need to show up in large numbers outside the summit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
39. Not just Yes, but Hell Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-01-09 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
40. ABSOLUTELY! If they are not included that tells me our President is scared of Big Medicine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faryn Balyncd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
41. Leaving out Single Payer advocates & appointing a Czar who wants to privatize Medicare !#?#!#? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thesquanderer (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
45. Is Elizabeth Edwards invited to the summit? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TalkingDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-02-09 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
48. Don't give me Health Insurance, give me Health Care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC