Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH'S DISPOSABLE CONSTITUTION-By Scott Horton

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:37 AM
Original message
BUSH'S DISPOSABLE CONSTITUTION-By Scott Horton
March 3, 7:16 AM, 2009 · No Comment · Previous · Next
George W. Bush’s Disposable Constitution

By Scott Horton
..................

John Yoo’s Constitution is unlike any other I have ever seen. It seems to consist of one clause: appointing the President as commander-in-chief. The rest of the Constitution was apparently printed in disappearing ink.

We need to know how the memo was used. Bradbury suggests it was not much relied upon; I don’t believe that for a second. Moreover Bradbury’s decision to wait to the very end before repealing it suggests that someone in the Bush hierarchy was keen on having it.

It’s pretty clear that it served several purposes. Clearly it was designed to authorize sweeping warrantless surveillance by military agencies such as the Defense Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency. Using special new surveillance programs that required the collaboration of telecommunications and Internet service providers, these agencies were sweeping through the emails, IMs, faxes, and phone calls of tens of millions of Americans. Clearly such unlawful surveillance occurred. But the language of the memos suggest that much more was afoot, including the deployment of military units and military police powers on American soil. These memos suggest that John Yoo found a way to treat the Posse Comitatus Act as suspended.

.................

We may not have realized it at the time, but in the period from late 2001-January 19, 2009, this country was a dictatorship. The constitutional rights we learned about in high school civics were suspended. That was thanks to secret memos crafted deep inside the Justice Department that effectively trashed the Constitution. What we know now is likely the least of it.

more at:
http://harpers.org/archive/2009/03/hbc-90004488
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. We knew that when Joseph Padilla was picked up on a Chicago street
and wisked away to some off shore out of country gulag and denied all of his American Constitutional Rights. No one in America even blinked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Some of us blinked.
Some of us noticed that an AMERICAN CITIZEN was being denied his constitutional rights. We even said so. It got lost in the blizzard of catastrophes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Uh, some of us knew.
We knew there was a bloodless coup in 2000 which the media ignored. We were pretty stunned by it. Some didn't believe it had happened, that it could have happened in such silence. But WE weren't silent. We knew it happened. We said so. We were told to shut up and move on.

When the newspapers wonder why they're dying, they don't remember the day they made themselves irrelevant. When they forced us to search out the news and report it ourselves.

But some of us do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agent46 Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was clear
It was clear to anyone who was paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. king george....he told us it would be easier if he were a dictator.....and he was
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Has Rush discussed these yet
I mean he is the defender of the constitution - right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC