Prop 8: Regardless of the decision - two-prong approach is needed
30+years of being "out of the closet" - has given me a bit of perspective.
My first "activist" involvement was with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Bryant#Political_campaigning">Dade County and Anita Bryant waaaaay back in 1977. Although, I didn't live in Florida, I took part in the orange juice boycott, signed petitions, and joined in local marches.
At that time it looked like the GLBT rights movement had managed to band together. NOPE. Once the noise over Bryant stopped, the GLBT community pretty much split up into little groups with their own agendas and more often than not - engaged in fighting each other.
What happened?
For any civil rights movement to be successful - there must be unity around a central theme or symbol. Once Bryant disappeared from the headlines, so did the symbol and with it the reason for unity.
Prop 8 is providing a theme/symbol at the moment. What will happen when a decision is made? If the courts toss Prop 8 into the shredder - will the GLBT coommunity celebrate and go home? Most likely, as the battle has been "won", nothing more to see, move along.
As "limbaughian" as it may sound - upholding Prop 8 may be the best thing for the GLBT community - as it will give a reason, a theme, a symbol to continue fighting for civil rights. (feel free to flame)
The GLBT groups must unite on a national level, and we need a leader. Prop 8 could give us the reason for unity, but we still need that leader. Until that happens, we're just spinning our wheels.
A few states recognize "gay-marriage" in various forms, some state recognize "domestic partnerships" when it comes to health-care benefits - however on a national level - it's a crazy quilt of legislation. The debate needs to be framed by us - not by the opposition. When they talk about "special priviledges" or "special rights" - isn't marriage a special right/priviledge? Only married people can file tax returns jointly, only married people have the priviledge of having family health plans....etc.
First Prong: Take a page or two from Howard Dean's 50-state plan. Organize groups in each state to challenge discrimatory laws - and this means more than a once-a-year pride march.
Second Prong: Attack it on a national level. Drag everything and anything to a national level. Bring it into the Federal Courts, and push up the stairs to the Supreme Court.