Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prop 8: Regardless of the decision - two-prong approach is needed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 06:19 AM
Original message
Prop 8: Regardless of the decision - two-prong approach is needed
Prop 8: Regardless of the decision - two-prong approach is needed

30+years of being "out of the closet" - has given me a bit of perspective.

My first "activist" involvement was with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anita_Bryant#Political_campaigning">Dade County and Anita Bryant waaaaay back in 1977. Although, I didn't live in Florida, I took part in the orange juice boycott, signed petitions, and joined in local marches.

At that time it looked like the GLBT rights movement had managed to band together. NOPE. Once the noise over Bryant stopped, the GLBT community pretty much split up into little groups with their own agendas and more often than not - engaged in fighting each other.

What happened?

For any civil rights movement to be successful - there must be unity around a central theme or symbol. Once Bryant disappeared from the headlines, so did the symbol and with it the reason for unity.

Prop 8 is providing a theme/symbol at the moment. What will happen when a decision is made? If the courts toss Prop 8 into the shredder - will the GLBT coommunity celebrate and go home? Most likely, as the battle has been "won", nothing more to see, move along.

As "limbaughian" as it may sound - upholding Prop 8 may be the best thing for the GLBT community - as it will give a reason, a theme, a symbol to continue fighting for civil rights. (feel free to flame)

The GLBT groups must unite on a national level, and we need a leader. Prop 8 could give us the reason for unity, but we still need that leader. Until that happens, we're just spinning our wheels.

A few states recognize "gay-marriage" in various forms, some state recognize "domestic partnerships" when it comes to health-care benefits - however on a national level - it's a crazy quilt of legislation. The debate needs to be framed by us - not by the opposition. When they talk about "special priviledges" or "special rights" - isn't marriage a special right/priviledge? Only married people can file tax returns jointly, only married people have the priviledge of having family health plans....etc.

First Prong: Take a page or two from Howard Dean's 50-state plan. Organize groups in each state to challenge discrimatory laws - and this means more than a once-a-year pride march.

Second Prong: Attack it on a national level. Drag everything and anything to a national level. Bring it into the Federal Courts, and push up the stairs to the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sound analysis, I believe but don't forget how vital it is for like minded straight folks
to align themselves with this effort. I'm really, really hoping that Maine and Vermont pass legislatively mandated marriage equality laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. part of the marriage equality laws
need to include provisions to mutually recognize "gay" marriages performed in other states.

We live in PA, we can take a short drive to Massachusetts and get married - but if it's not recognized in PA it's just a MINO (marriage in name only)

Few more comments:

Another tactic is to start up a GLBT version of Emily's List - put money into campaigns of GLBT friendly politicians.

Regarding calling it MARRIAGE vs CIVIL UNIONS - on a personal level I don't care - as long as the SAME "special priviledges" given to straight couples are given to my partner and me. The only difference I can see between the two is a matter whether or not it's a religious ceremony or a civil one - and even a religous official needs STATE recognition to perform a LEGAL marriage.

You don't need a religious official to oversee the ceremony, an Elvis impersonator (if legally recognized by the state) can perform a marriage and it's a legal marriage across the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I really like the idea of forming a GLBT version of Emily's List
I hope you're passing on your ideas to the relevant organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I've sent an outline/summary of my suggestions
to various GLBT organizations in PA... the only responses I've received are crickets or a "we're a social group, not a political one"...

Hoping to get my post bumped up to the front page list and perhaps catch attention on a larger podium
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. a kick from the voice in the wilderness.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. Kicked and recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC