Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is socialism a dirty word?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:11 PM
Original message
Why is socialism a dirty word?
Increasingly I see conservatives tossing out the evils of socialism when criticising the liberal agenda. I want to know what is so bad about socialism. I'm now living in a country(The UK) that is in some areas heavily peppered with aspects of socialism. We have the National Health Service, there's a safety net for those who are poorer or out of work. If you have a close relative who needs caring for then you can receive a carer's benefit that allows you to stay home and care for them, if you cannot afford housing then the local council will place you in council housing or subsidize your rent. ............and as a result we don't see homelessness here.

I just read a news report that says 1 in 50 American children will be homeless this year......and I just saw a report on a foodbank on NBC. If a little bit of socialism prevents incidences such as this then what in the world is so wrong with it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Quite simply, it doesn't involve profit n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Thats not entirely true
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 07:22 PM by Oregone
Many public owned institutions generate profit, which is distributed to the shareholders (the state).

Here is a crown corporation I get my power from. It generated almost half a billion in profit last year: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BC_Hydro

(The state also owns the car insurance, health insurance, and a variety of other large business. Some operate at profit, and others at loss)

A socialized industry can run EXACTLY like a private industry. The ONLY difference is who owns it and where the profits are going (private coffers vs public)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tangent90 Donating Member (787 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Can I defend the concept of profit (a reasonable amount) and still be a DUer?
Is there something intrinsically wrong with a system that allows someone to obtain a product, add some value to it through labor and recoup the effort through a higher price?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Whale Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. No, however there is
something wrong with a system that views that (fanatically) as the only way anything can happen. And there is a problem when that process impacts negatively on peoples lives.

I think most socialists in Europe would class themselves as democratic socialists whereby they believe in the free market, but a state that negates the bad effects of that, and ensures that businesses that feed off society pay enough back in taxes etc so that national health services and council housing can help the most needy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. "Some value" isn't added to it from labor. It's value originates from labor.
Obtaining a product and "adding some value to it" is not how capitalism works. That's how over-operated cottage industries work. Ex. I buy tiles and handpaint them. That is a worker making money for him or herself by adding value to the item and earning extra for his labor. That's a laborer with a direct relationship to his customer. That's not capitalism. Capitalism is the extraction of profit from labor.

Let's say we're in the industrial era. There is no "original product." Laborers mine the tin, design the factory, build the factory, run the factory, fix the machines, do the bookkeeping. What does the capitalist do? He funds the project. But where does he get that money? There are a few possibilities:

(1) He inherited it from his father, who was a capitalist? But this isn't an answer. That begs an infinite regression.
(2) He inherited it from his family, who were royalty. This means that capitalism is the perpetuation of social power by king/birthright.
(3) He has stolen the money or conned the money.
(4) He was very frugal and saved his salary as a laborer, pennies lead to dollars and eventually he had enough money to buy his first factory and his first mine.
(5) He was very frugal and saved his salary as a laborer, and eventually a bank (where do banks get their money?) gave him a loan.

The last two are the fantasies that Americans like best. But the idea that laborers can "save their wages" is as difficult now as it was 200 years ago. This is because capital makes its money through suppressing the wages of labor. Unless the capitalist intends to risk his business only buying materials when they are at their very lowest in comparison to other capitalists, profit must be made by driving wages down. The laborer will always take less, because he needs the labor to survive. Capitalists have an incentive to band together to keep wages as low as possible so they can make as much money as possible.

The existence of communism/socialism was a check in this system of driving wages down. The workers had a means of revolt. The decline of communism led Reagan and his predecessors to suppress labor--eventually leading to the crisis we're in now.

There are a few examples of people with talent and good ideas who "get rich": Actors. Musicians. Writers. Every now and then some scrappy mom invents something like AIRBORNE and gets a corporation to produce it (with suppressed wages). Oh wait. Airborne has been discovered as a complete scam and it's inventor a con artist.

I have no problem with a laborer profiting from his own hard work. Hell, neither did Marx. He said that was the dream. But wages have been pushed to the point of global slavery through capitalist's access to state military apparatuses, death squads, and police. Heck, the drug trade is a major source of income to modern capitalism. But we're close to the end game. Maybe we won't reach it for another 50 years, but we're close. Average people lost the entire earth, and capitalists own it almost entirely. The problem now is that they've taken so much and they've consolidated their ranks to such a low number, that no one can afford to buy the products that they themselves make.

It's an unsustainable system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baikonour Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. There is a problem when...
the process in which you receive said profit (capitalism) ultimately leads to corporatism (fascism).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. ask Eugene Debs
the word has been demonized by wealth & power for 100 years in Murka.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. There isn't a damn thing wrong with a mixed economy
And the state can make a fortune off of certain socialized industries. Its just negatively connotated in America, after years of the investor class slandering the term (to ensure all industry remains privately owned).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. That reminds me of something
I've heard over and over lately - which explains why I can't remember it! But it's something about public losses but private profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Thats called "lemon socialism"
Its what they do in the states. Socialize the losses, privatize the profits. They use socialism as a model to absorb private industries losses, yet they never ask for a share of the profits. The problem is that Americans cannot conceive that the government could have an ownership stake in a business, and generate profit from it. Instead, we pour a ton of money helping out struggling businesses, and ask for nothing substantial in return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. coz everybody would have to drive the same kind of car.
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 07:23 PM by KG
i read it right here on DU. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That'd be the clown car to end all clown cars. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReliantJ Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. and two channel TV's.
But yeah it's dirty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because it doesn't give corporations total control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because most Americans think of socialism as gulags and bread lines. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marauding liberal Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because the corporate media tells us it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because you're one of the few and far between Americans that has ever read a book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanngrisnir3 Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. There are no dirty words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. A century-old corporatist brainwashing campaign.....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celtic_88 Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why is socialism a dirty word
Socialism is Not working in the UK. I grew up there . NHS was
great until the 80', no more it's now a mess.  Private insured
get taking first same Hospital same doctor Months earlier than
a NHS patient I know I was the PATIENT. 
Council housing is getting like the Projects here, filthy  no
repairs  done, yards never taken care of,  I grew up in
council housing I loved it, but then people cared. They dont
now.
And who pays for all this. NHS is taken out of every Paycheck
so everybody pays Accept the tossers on the dole, who Don't
want to work Like wise here. 
Asylum seekers have taken over.  I saw lots of homeless on the
streets of London, Birmingham, Manchester, Glasgow and
Edinburgh. 
cheers . 

I'm a Red Clydesider by the way.
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Whale Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. The NHS is better now than
ever. It was horrifcally underfunded under the Tories but since 97 (as much as i hate much of what New Labour have done, or haven't done) has seen massive improvements and massive investment.

I know there are problems (major ones) but it still provides the best care for the elderly, poor and vulnerable. It needs much more but i have seen huge improvements. We just now need to get PFIs out of the NHS so we can get the things clean again.

Totally agree on council housing though. Another thing killed by the Tories and not revived under Labour. There are now nearly 2 million on the waiting list and rising.

"Asylum seekers have taken over" Mate, come on, this ain't the Daily Mail.

BTW, my Dad played a few Gigs in the red star club in Glasgow in the 70s... loved it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. God dam it! Why on earth is everyone letting Republicans frame this discussion?
Socialism is not creeping into our nation. What you are seeing is Democracy fighting back against tyrannical Fascism - and don't let them call it anything other than that. It just pisses me off no end - they call it socialism because that's a traditionally dirty word and so now every god damned thing Democrats do is Socialism God dam it - it is not! This is creeping Democracy - that is what it is. Let's at least call it by the right god damned name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celtic_88 Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Socialism is not creeping into our nation
I agree to a certain extent with all you said. The Democrats need to get back to the people who voted for them and stop trying to outspend Republicans. We need a health system for everybody ,but don't use the NHS as an example. I want a politician any politician that will do what he says he would do, when he was looking for my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ignorance. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espiral Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. re: OP
I think that a lot of it can be traced to the Victorian era
over here. The railroads, Manifest Destiny and the Gilded Age
are what really set the wheels turning. Industrialization and
the automobile poured another ton of kerosene on the whole
thing. Before that, this country had mostly been a sleepy
little patchwork of yeoman farmers. How quickly things
changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. cold war propoganda
to many uninformed Americans socialism = communism or totalitarianism.

but many Europeans would beg to differ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. That's my answer, too.
We were taught in school during the 1960s that everything-Russian was "evil" -- particularly, Russia's communist/socialist government.

Btw, socialism doesn't allow property ownership.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Whale Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. Viva socialism. The NHS is
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 08:19 PM by B Whale
Britain's greatest acheivement. Forget the empire, arts, literature or science or any other jingoistic nonsense, creating a health service free at the point of need for everyone is the greatest of them all.

Socialism is not a dirty word, it means a committment to society and the people within it, every one.

I think in the USA it is code for communism by the right so negative and even here in the UK is probably not used commonly since the hard left lost credibility on the 70s and 80s.

btw Nye Bevin founded the NHS and was born not far from where you are now. Enjoy wales...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
24. Yeah, Socialism is just awful
it's why you see all those Swedes storming the U.S. embassy in Stockholm begging to be allowed to emigrate here.

That's my response whenever I hear someone act as though Socialism is an unimaginable horror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. Because people are stupid.
IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Because Republicans are illiterate and "liberal" doesn't scare people anymore.
I see some of these idiots saying that both Bush and Obama are socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. Only for the poor & workers it's capitalism... the rich & corporations live in government socialism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. That's not socialism. That's oligarchy.
They protect one another to a point but they'll slash one another's throats as quickly as they'll slash ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. "Why is socialism a dirty word?" A: the corporate news media n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC