Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you had the choice of buying into a "Medicare type" of plan.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 07:53 PM
Original message
If you had the choice of buying into a "Medicare type" of plan.....
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 07:54 PM by Postman
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/10

would you do it if it offered less coverage than the plan you have now?(if you're already insured)

Private insurers are fearful of customers dropping their plan for a "Medicare type" of plan. But would they leave if the coverage it offered were less than the coverage of the private plan?

I've a feeling that if it were to come to fruition, the option to buy into a Medicare type of plan, the coverages would be less than what a private insurer would offer in order to kowtow to the health insurance industry.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. why can't things be done in reverse -- medicare for all -- if someone wants and can
afford additional insurance -- then they can buy that as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. To me
That would be the best solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have Medicare and it has huge gaps in it. I suppose that it is
better than no insurance but there is still a yearly deductible, co-pays, no drug coverage and the cost of supplements to cover what part B(doctors) does not cover are large. I pay just under $100.00 a month for part B alone. No drug, and I get the balance bill from the Doctors after visits. I think if it included drug coverage, it would be better. You can still end up with thousands of dollars of hospital and doctor bills because Medicare only covers 80% of your bill after you have met the deductible. You are on your own with the medicine.

Hard on us old folks with just Social Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That is absolute bullsh*t.
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 08:15 PM by Postman
IMO if you're on Medicare, there should be NO COSTS to the patient. Period.

We could fully subsidize Medicare with a STET tax....
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/09/26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess it would all depend on what the plans covered or didn't cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think a lot of people would, because the private market would change
The private market would offer cheap and affordable supplemental plans to fill the gaps in the Medicare coverage. The total bill would be a fraction of what full private would cost.

Yeah, call it a hunch, but Im 99% sure that is what would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nope
I wouldn't buy into a government plan that isn't as good as I already have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would like to have the option. Now not having any options, I'm locked into
a job for the insurance. If I could get a Medicare-type of plan, then I could switch jobs when I wanted without going
completely uninsured. I bet those same companies could make a lot of money selling the kind of supplemental insurance they currently sell
to those on Medicare. Then you could have better coverage AND portability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. How could I be LESS covered than the plan I'm currently on?
My partner and I pay $180 a month for our coverage through her work (leaving about a whopping $450 a month in earnings usually) and I can't afford the co-pay to go to the doctor, get treatment, and my medication isn't covered.

Other than maybe coming in handy in an immediate, life-threatening scenario, it's cost me more with insurance than I'd be paying out of pocket so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC