Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not freedom from religion."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:11 PM
Original message
"The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not freedom from religion."
A billboard in Idaho declaring "Beware of dogma" is the latest example of humanist activists using advertising to promote atheism.

Several atheist groups in Idaho, including Humanists of Idaho, recently erected the billboard ad near Fairview Avenue and Maple Grove Road in Boise.

The ad was sponsored by the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation, which launched a national billboard campaign in late 2007, taking its religion-free messages state-by-state.

The humanists contend dogma is to blame for laws against gay marriage and hope their sign will help keep religion out of politics, according to a FOX News affiliate in Boise.

Bryan Fischer, executive director of Idaho Values Alliance, responded to the billboard in a statement last week, saying, "The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not freedom from religion."

http://christianpost.com/Society/General/2009/03/atheist-billboard-hits-idaho-10/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm currently reading this book
http://www.amazon.com/Why-Religious-Right-Wrong-Separation/dp/0879758341

It's a thorough refutation of all the Religious Right nonsense about the Constitution and church/state issues. The book is somewhat dated, but it's still a great source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. So let's declare America a Pagan nation and see if the religious right still believes what they spew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Aren't Pagans religious?
I mean, it's just another organized religion.

We're fine just as we are, as our Founding Fathers wanted us to be - secular, unburdened by anyone's religious beliefs, free to choose what we want to believe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I agree. The trouble is, once there are enough of you to give you a name...
...you're a group. If Paganism is a religion, why isn't Atheism? It's a group of people whose bond is a shared belief system. Sounds like religion to me.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Yes they are religious and I agree with you...
I am not Pagan and I am not actually endorsing the idea of turning our nation into a Pagan nation, I am simply pointing out that the religious right would not be too happy to see church and state intertwined if it were intertwined with a religion they did not believe in.

I am actually both a card carrying member and a volunteer organizer for the ACLU so I am a very strong believer in the Separation of Church and State, I don't want religion to have any direct influence on the way our government is run. I have found that most people agree with this position as soon as it is suggested that a religion other than there own should have the power, those who don't want a separation of church and state want to make sure that when religion controls government it is their religion in control. As soon as it is suggested that another religion (or even a different denomination of their religion) should be in control then they are not so hot on the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Again, just like all rightwingnuts,
they can dish it out, but they truly cannot take it.

And I am always appalled when I hear someone say we're a Christian nation. I usually counter that with, "Really? I thought we were a Jewish nation. Or maybe a Sufi nation. Where did you get that idea?"

That's usually the end of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. disregard
Edited on Tue Mar-10-09 08:29 PM by FLAprogressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. are you saying that suspicion of dogma is in itself is dogma?
I don't buy that.


Main Entry: dog·ma
Pronunciation: \ˈdȯg-mə, ˈdäg-\
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural dogmas also dog·ma·ta \-mə-tə\
Etymology: Latin dogmat-, dogma, from Greek, from dokein to seem — more at decent
Date: 1638
1 a: something held as an established opinion ; especially : a definite authoritative tenet b: a code of such tenets <pedagogical dogma> c: a point of view or tenet put forth as authoritative without adequate grounds
2: a doctrine or body of doctrines concerning faith or morals formally stated and authoritatively proclaimed by a church
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I'm sorry...I misread the article. I thought that Christian activists were putting that up.
Disregard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Actualy, the Constitution
was written with religious liberty in mind - freedom to choose your religion, and choosing none is a valid choice. That's the definition of religious liberty. Contrary to what some wish were so, we are not a Christian nation. We are a secular nation, as guaranteed by the Constitution.

After all, our country was founded by people who chose not to worship as they had been ordered.

I think everyone in American schools, public, private, and parochial should be required to take a course in the Constitution, taught by a law school professor - like I once was, like Obama once was. Those of us who love and respect the Constitution make pretty good teachers, and because we are so enthusiastic about our subject, our students learn a lot and learn to love that venerable document as much as we do.

This kind of damnable ignorance is troubling. But, those who see only one way will continue to see only one way until they are shown the light. And, no, that's not a light shining from within a church......................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Didn't they used to call that course "Civics"?
It should be in every class room across America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think so,
but I'd like to see the whole course dedicated to the Constitution. A lot of my Civics class, a long time ago, was about it, but we also covered a lot that would now be called "Government."

It was a good course. Set me on the road to the law.

I wonder what they teach now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. The First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Please notice that it first protects us from religion - then gives us freed of religion
but thanks to goodness never mandates religion on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-10-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. As usual, the Republican is wrong.
The 1st Amendment certainly does grant us freedom from religion. It's called the anti-establishment clause.

I don't even believe the Republican is an idiot who can't read. He just lies. That's going to be a hard habit for the Republican Party to break.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC