Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC=REPUKE MORNING SHOW

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
fumsm Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:13 AM
Original message
MSNBC=REPUKE MORNING SHOW
Why is it that NBC insist on having a 100% repuke morning show. Scar and friends are the worst I have ever seen. It's like a parallel universe of faux news. He doesn't stop winning about taxes and democrats. There is NO intelligent discussion. Now he is using profanity on ever show. WTF?? We should feel sorry for the rich is his mantra, non-stop. How in the hell does NBC expect people who are broke, jobless and loosing their homes to listen to this crap? It is sickening at best. This morning his theme is the new tax laws, which are not due for 2 years, moved up to 39% on the rich, has turned into 70%. He never mentions rockhead Reagan's 50% tax on the rich. What an asshole. NBC must be full of repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Morning Rich Guy Gab Fest - a disgusting display. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. someone pointed out on another thread
that MSNBC programming runs from 5 PM to 11 PM and the rest of the time is a RW GE Infomercial...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. huh?
Harold Ford Jr was just on.

oh - I guess this is just the requisite bash-morning-joe post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ford talks more Republican than Dem imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Three words that explain Harold Ford: Democratic Leadership Council
a.k.a. Republican Lite, Corporate ADORING political whores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. so I guess you feel similarly toward Vilsack, Bayh, and B.Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. and Dorgan, Emanuel, Edwards, Feinstein, Gore, Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. Damn the DLC
and Voted for Torture Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I just don't think the show is that bad - I do not want to see a fox-like network spouting
left-progressive messages only.

I guess some find comfort with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qazplm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. my problem is not the leanings
heck it would be just fine if a network had left AND right leaning programs on, that's called balance.

I just think it's rather...unsophisticated and simplistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I hear ya - and usually it would be much better to spend time
on C-SPAN's coverage of hearings, Senate, Congress etc. Hear it directly than through the translation of these "entertainers".

But - they are trying to maximize listeners. And anything more sophisticated and in-depth would just drive many many listeners to CNN, FOX etc. It is a real balancing act - politics vs entertainment.

It would certainly be more refreshing and enlightening to hear a couple of Senators debate an issue with a moderator who's goal is to let the guests talk (vs monopolizing the time) - one from each side. But that is not going to happen - no profit in that. Need a blustery host, a blond sidekick, some quasi-literate guests and some issues (if they don't come to the surface, invent them).

I will continue to listen to morning-joe. With all it's deficiencies, imo it is the best of the morning shows - unless CSPAN has a decent topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. shallow, superficial, and usually silly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. they can have good guests - and they can handle them appropriately
I am sure that "silly" behavior is being rewarded from some listeners who like it. With no positive feedback, it would surely change.

I agree - I do not care for it. Joe's constant charges of Mikas drug use, for example. That is completely out of place.

oh well - that is why we have several choices to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. But he did spank Tom Delay on Hardball a week or two back.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaaKCY-ZR8g

And, also, I'd still rather have Ford as my senator than that rich idiot Porker... I mean Corker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. I watched it for about 3 minutes, then turned back to C-span.
I wish they'd have real progressives to debate them. At least Rachel has the opposition on sometimes. Cowards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Joey the Scar, his fawning abused wife "Mika" and wannabe son "Willy" are VILE characters.
What's even more tragic for this hideous demonstration that masquerades as a Morning Talk Show is that these players haven't a clue. :crazy:

Hello?!? Mourning Ho-Jo!?! The American People are NOT listening to you.

In other words, "YOU SUCK!" :evilgrin: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Meeker has a job to do....to be Mika the Meek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. lame$tream media - Repuke Propaganda - 99% of it.
It's why I won't pay for it - get mine on the net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. they have good guests sometimes
But all to often, I get frustrated when Joe or Mika treat certain guests I like with such contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
17. It's all about ratings
That's the number one agenda of all cable news--ratings and more ratings. MSNBC is desperate to claw its way up in the numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. well . . . they are in business to make a profit - and more listeners = more money
can't hardly blame 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. It's all ratings driven, but that's their business
I don't blame them, and I find the arguments about them being shills for one side or the other kind of amusing. The only side they are on is their own side. Even those folks on talk radio, when I hear them ranting or screaming and spewing something inane, I wonder if they even believe what they're saying themselves or if it's just an act to get more listeners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. absolutely - Ed Schultz is a perfect example
He was a RWer until he saw a gap on the left side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. MSNBC is a loss leader for GE. . ratings are *nearly* irrelevant.
"loss leader". . . look it up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. why do you assume "loss leader" needs to be looked up?
do you think no one else knows what that means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. I stopped watching this several months ago
I used to watch MSNBC over breakfast, but I got sick of that crap and now I read the paper instead. My mornings are much improved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
23. Joe & Mica move their fool-fest over to WABC radio when they're
done polluting MSNBC. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC