Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sanford Pulls $700m From School Funding...Potentially Forcing 7,500 Teacher Layoffs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:21 PM
Original message
Sanford Pulls $700m From School Funding...Potentially Forcing 7,500 Teacher Layoffs

Sanford Pulls $700m From School Funding To Pay Off State Debt, Potentially Forcing 7,500 Teacher Layoffs


Last month, eighth grader Ty’Sheoma Bethea was an honored guest of President Obama when he made his address to a joint session of Congress. Bethea had written a letter to Gov. Mark Sanford (R) asking him to repair her school, JV Martin Jr High School in Dillon, SC, which was falling apart. “I felt that our school was in bad condition,” she said. “After the stimulus bill was passed I hoped we could get some of the money to rebuild the school.”

However, Sanford continues to stand in the way of Bethea’s hopes. Yesterday, in what Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) deemed “100 percent political posturing,” Sanford announced he would seek to pay down the state’s debt by redirecting $700 million of the state’s stimulus money meant for school funding and public safety:

– 81.8% must be used to backfill education funding to maintain current funding levels and prevent school districts from laying off teachers and increasing class sizes. Any money that remains can be used for school modernization or construction.

– 18.2% is discretionary funds provided to the governor which can be used for “public safety or other government services.”


John Cooley, deputy superintendent for finance and operations at the South Carolina Department of Education, explained that the stimulus funds would help fill a 15 percent budget cut already inflicted on the school system. Without those funds, Cooley estimated that up 7,500 teachers (15 percent of the state’s 50,000 teachers) could be negatively impacted. But he cautioned, “I’m not going to sit here and tell you that we’ve reduced 7,500 teachers” or that all 7,500 will lose their jobs.

Regardless, Cooley warned that Sanford’s cuts will make an already dire situation much worse:

It’s going to create a significant problem for us if that was to happen. I know that our general assembly — the House of Representatives completed their work on the appropriation bill for 2010 and they have used that money and appropriated it to education to help fill in the cuts that we’ve taken. If those funds are not permitted to be used that way, it will create a significant problem for the education budget in South Carolina.


more...

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/12/sanford-stimulus-education/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it me or do Republics want to burn down the whole farm because they didn't get their way?
It really seems like it - its as if he WANTS to turn SC into a Third World Country...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I can't believe he has presidential aspirations yet is acting like this.
I think his logic has left him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's certainly abusive
to the people of SC.

I mean really.

Obama says heres $700 mil for SC education. So the gov says, 'Nah, we're gonne not use it because... it would be successful; and we wouldn't want that."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. like the whiny lil' boy who gets his @$$ handed to him when playing by the rules, Reskanks walk off
the field, stomping, taking their ball and bat with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. What an asshole
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. And where does South Carolina rank on education?
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 02:33 PM by PA Democrat
I know it's not good because my right wing relatives were complaining how bad the schools there are, but they also don't want to pay taxes to support education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. 38 of America's 100 worst schools are in SC
And, as our local alternative newsweekly so trenchantly observed, the reason SC ranks last or close to last in every measure of wellbeing is "because we keep electing men like Mark Sanford". And to the person who doesn't believe he has presidential aspirations - I think he honestly believes that he can get elected by pandering to the base. "If it worked for Dubya, it can work for me" seems to be his motto. He doesn't seem to realize that things have changed since 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Belial Donating Member (503 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. So the states get the money and they are supposed to
break it out by the counties? I am confused.. the districts / counties pay for teachers? Not trying to be dumber than I am.. LOL Someone please help..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It was supposed to be spent on education, not to pay off the
state debt. As to how it's distributed, I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Belial Donating Member (503 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thats what I was confused about.. the counties and cities
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 02:47 PM by Belial
pay for the teachers.. not the state..

Edit - Thank You for the response
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Both the state and the federal government provide some funding
for public schools, with the remainder being paid through local taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Guess who is running for President in 2012?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. I believe SC has about 50% high school dropout rate
Yup, this kind of success just begs to be heard. The world is waiting to hear the "success" of the modern state called South Carolina. I'm sure they could lead us into solving all our problems!!! Jesus Christ, they are about two farts away from being their own third world country and we are suppose to be impressed with this!!??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC