Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eek! Santorum yesterday: ‘I Really Believe The Fundamentals Of American Economy Is Still Strong’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:11 PM
Original message
Eek! Santorum yesterday: ‘I Really Believe The Fundamentals Of American Economy Is Still Strong’
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 04:16 PM by babylonsister
:crazy:

Santorum: ‘I Really Believe The Fundamentals Of American Economy Is Still Strong’


On his radio show last night, conservative talker Hugh Hewitt asked former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) to give his “sense of where the economy is headed right now.” Santorum replied that he had “an innate sense that America is never going to revisit the Depression era again.” “I really don’t believe we’re going to go there again,” said Santorum.

After criticizing President Obama’s “doom and gloom” predictions, Santorum declared, “I really do believe that the fundamentals of American economy is still strong”:

SANTORUM: I think we’re probably, you know, reaching the bottom here in the next few months. There’s probably some more bad things that are going to happen, particularly in the credit markets. But, look, I don’t think — I think all this prediction of Obama’s doom and gloom and some others out there I think is overblown. I really do believe that the fundamentals of American economy is still strong and that we are, you know, we’ll pull ourselves out of this probably by the end of the year.

more...

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/12/santorum-fundamentals-strong/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. The end of the year??
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. 'are' still strong. dumb ass. put a plural on the fundamentals and
you need are, not is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. What's worse - his economic cluelessness or his grammatical cluelessness?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry to be a doom'n'gloom hating prick, but I hope Mr Santorum is right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. not to prick your hope balloon, but the simple fact that is was santorum
suggests this will make the 30s depression look like a cakewalk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's because the right fucking sucks at economics
They believe that the "fundament" of the American economy is the free market system, and refuse to accept that that system itself is flawed and largely unworkable. So they maintain that the"fundamentals are strong" it's just everything else that's fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They suck at grammar, too.
"The fundamentals IS..."

mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Yup. The fundamentals of American grammar are clearly very weak...
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 05:39 PM by Ghost Dog
"There’s probably some more bad things that are going to happen..."

(That should read "thing's", of course).

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hope he's right and that the economy is doing better....
...by the end of 2009 than it is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Last time I checked
fundamentals ARE strong or the economy IS strong - not fundamentals of the economy is strong. If he can't get his verb tenses right, how can he be right about the economy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Also true... but tell me this: If I were to loose my pocket change, would I
become lose if I had sex with lots of strangers?

:evilgrin:

(In short, regarding grammatical etiquette, which I am not well versed with, more than republicants have problems with the essentials... :D )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. But you aren't a US Senator
as least I don't think you are.

I expect more of the people who are expected to lead this country - and yes, I realize that intelligence is not a criteria for getting elected to office (another indication of what's wrong with our election system). The statement demonstrated both a disconnect with the ordinary citizens, a complete lack of understanding about economics, and poor grammar to add insult to injury.

Also - your example is a spelling issue as much as a grammar issue. If you were speaking, you probably wouldn't make the mistake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. The idiocy is astounding. Truly. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. i would rather listen to the three stooges take on the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. No wonder this happened
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Did Santorum feed McShame that pathetic line last fall?
It's odd that he would openly say the same thing that accelerated McCain's epic fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hey, Ricky, you don't have to channel John McCain yet.
Oh wait, maybe it's Herbert Hoover you're trying to channel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Another fact-hating, fat-cat Republicon Homelander propagandist
Why do republicons hate facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. what fundementals is he talking about?
the hedge funds, mega banks, credit swaps, cdos, checking accounts, employment numbers, what the hell does he know? Sure would be nice if he'd clue us all in.

but, he's an asshole to the nth degree, maybe he knows what animal husbandry is:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC