Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jon Stewart crossed the line last night.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:31 AM
Original message
Jon Stewart crossed the line last night.
He went from comedy/variety host to something new and entirely different.

He's something I haven't seen since Frost interviewed Nixon.

I think Jon crossed a line into history last night. That interview was part Beale, part Frost, part Rather and even part Cronkite. He had his facts, he held no quarter and he was cordial and polite. Jon was the penultimate television journalist Thursday evening. Yes, Jon crossed a line last night and I am unsure as to if I want him to cross back. His brilliant mind could be so well used in the venue it was employed with Cramer in so many ways but, god I would miss his comedic half hours four nights a week.

Whichever side of the line he stays or goes to I will be a fan and hope that he has as many years as possible on either or both sides.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dammit Ann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. I love trouble makers!
And, btw, HELL YES! Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks for the welcome.
You have the same first name as my ex had, dammit! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dammit Ann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sorry. love your name and yes, I get it.
cute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. God no!
I stole the name from the 19th C author who wrote pulp like King Salomon's Mines and such. However, haggard as an adjective would prove an interesting name as well. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dammit Ann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. O.K. maybe my mind sometimes goes to darker places than it should.
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 03:54 AM by Dammit Ann
You were admirably quick to defend yourself. You will do well on DU. Being named Ann is not a character flaw, although, I do usually hold people accountable who innocently possess an ex's name. It's like a tick. You're completely natural in that, for sure. And I like the way you think. You definitely have found the right place in this little crazy, wonderful part of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. Rider Haggard
Rider Haggard

As in Haggard the terrible by Dick Brown? A comic stripe about a viking and what he is doing in his daily life?. In Norwigian he is named Hårrek den store. Or for short just Hårrek... A old norse hame, who in fact have their place in Snorre Sturlasons book from the 12 century

Diclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzycrumbhunger Donating Member (793 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. LOL--you mean Hagar?
Sorry, but it's Hagar the Horrible by Dik Brown. (I think his son Chris still lives in the Sarasota area and did Hagar after his dad died, BTW. Both of them looked like the Viking IRL.) :hi:

But on topic, my son and I agreed way back during the interminable campaign season that Stewart was not just a mediocre comedian (mkay, his bit in Half Baked was funny), he's a really sharp, witty news guy who just hides behind comedy. Kind of a bastard child between Dick Cavett, David Frost, and Dennis Leary. Or sumpin'. Best political commentary in ages.

And all the other side gets is caustic, one-dimensional arseholes. Lawl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
69. buzzycrumbhunger
buzzycrumbhunger

Off course, it was Hagar the Horrible by Dick Brown;). Yes his son Cris is still painting the cartoon, but in the style of Dick Brown. And I have to say, he is still funny.. Even that the hunt for women and some others stuff, who raised some problems in the US are goon... The old Viking have been a good family father now, when he is not out and fighting dragons, or spaghetti that is:evilgrin: He is very fun of Paris, and Milan for some reason;)

Yes I believe also that Steward have used comedy, to hide behind when he in reality is a sharp man, who can make his point across many times.. He is an witty news man who have chosen to hide between the comedy, it have maybe been the only "allowed" way in the last 8 year or så, to get the american public to know that you are been fucked over again, and again, and again without been detected by the "patriot police" on the far right side... The others who have tried to get the information across the table have many times been stabbed in the back by the "loyalist" and more or less been told to leave or be fired by they who own the media utless.. US MEDIA have been very blind the last 8 year, more or less brain dead if you ask Me.

Dciclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
43. Close, he did write She: She Who Must be Obeyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
86. Someone actually made that into a movie with Peter Cushing and Ursula Andress
in 1965:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/She_(1965_film)

I saw it on TV late one:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #86
91. It's so schmaltzy - I love it. And the blond King guy is a beaut!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
56. Well, I've read Snorri, but haven't seen the cartoon på norsk.
So I had no clue that he had been transformed into Hårrek den store.

Anyway, I assumed you got your name from H. Rider Haggard.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #56
70. Jackpine Radical
Jackpine Radical

I thing I got the thing wrong.. It was Hagard the terrible who i was thingking about;): Not H. Rider Haggard... I was tired haven't sleep all night, so I guess I got the name wrong...

But Hagard the terrible, are translated into Norwigian on a more or less regular basis, and have the name Hårrek;).. After a caracter in Snorre..

Diclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #70
77. I understood--thought you were making a joke re: Hagar/Haggard.
A deliberate "confusion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #77
83. Jackpine Radical
Jackpine Radical

No, not a deliberate coonfusion at all I am sorry to say, Just a dam bad "translating" in my head...

And Hagar the terrible are in fact written in "nynorsk" not in Bokmål, but is still funny to read;):. In a population of mer 4.6 million we have tree public languages.. Bokmål, nynorsk and sami in the north... Not bad for a small country like Norway? It have for the most part something with the history of norway the last 1000 year or so..

Diclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
52. You forgot his first initial
H. Rider Haggard, he of King Solomon's Mines.

I had a college professor named Hugh E. Haggard. Close................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. Well, I read a bio of him and found out that he went by Rider
and not Henry. There's a great bio of him by D.S. Higgins for those out there interested in 19th C English writers called Rider Haggard, A Biography.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Yet, his books are all written by
"H. Rider Haggard."

So, you're just his good buddy?

Gocha............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. That's the way he signed them.
And most of his correspondence.

I think I'm probably one of twelve people that have ever read his bios and diaries... So I guess I have way too much time on my hands. :)

BUT! I'm not the only one to leave off the H.! http://www.amazon.com/WOODVILLE-CLEOPATRA-THEATRE-RIDER-HAGGARD/dp/B001MXBBX4/ref=sr_1_11?ie=UTF8&s=home-garden&qid=1236984495&sr=8-11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. Good for you.....
I daresay there aren't very many folks - outside of the academe - who would even recognize his works, let alone his name.

Well done, pal.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #72
93. I almost changed my nick in January to Lamont Cranston.
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 12:29 AM by jhrobbins
But I daresay that it is not as obscure as H. Rider Haggard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #93
101. The Shadow
would have known..................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. Hehe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #71
87. I enjoyed Haggard's work
for many years when I was younger, and was often told his books were for "boys." Strange that all the "boys" books were filled with action, interesting subjects and fun, while all the "girls" books were far more limited in both scope and thrilling aspects. I was quite happy to tell some of these people that I could read whatever I wanted to, and to stop trying to control my reading material!

I still harbor ill will against the 1985 version of the movie with Sharon Stone and Richard Chamberlain. They made a mockery of everything Harrard wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesatemple Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #52
73. Funny! I heard of
a guy named Hugh G. Rection. As I understand it, he was quite popular with the ladies. I suppose a good name will do wonders for a person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. I put a character named Hugh Jorgen in one of my novels.
And, yes, his name was not false advertising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #73
103. And not to mention
Heywood Jablome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
90. I really get pissed when I hear people say, 'Yeah, he's really funny
but he's not that smart'. They should be so lucky to have a fraction of his intellect. I bring this up because I have actually heard people saying this of late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jon did a great job-And the line needed to be "crossed" If indeed one needs to calcualte it that way
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 03:40 AM by GreenTea
Comedy Central - I laughed and enjoyed the truth for a change, how 'bout you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nothing like a Knight weilding a Sharp Sword of TRUTH....cuts through BS like butter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
78. Ditto. He gets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Penultimate" = second to last
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 04:10 AM by Squatch
...fixed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Frost.
But we don't get to see that much of Sir David lately.

Or possibly the Woodward from the Watergate days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Actually it's "second to last"
Either way, obviously it wasn't the word the OP intended. No shame in that really, stuff happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. You're right.
I used the word improperly. Through my own misunderstanding of it... Damn, I've used it improperly for quite a while and thanks, I hope others weren't being polite and just misheard in my previous usages of the word.

Good on you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. it's a word whose usage has led many to that mistake
We all learned the proper usage the same way - the way you did.

So don't sweat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
40. Thanks, I learn something every day.
I've misused the word the same way that the OP did. But not any more! With God as my witness, never again shall anyone cast asparagus on my use of language!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
66. Luckily he did not spell anything wrong.
Then the spelling police come out with their tasers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. You ain't the only one...
I considered myself quite literate when I wa a kid...read a lot...miused the words 'genuflect' 'penultimate', 'sacrosanct', all to great embarassment...

sort of like the guy who thought the Beatles song was "State Trooper, One way ticket, yeah" (Day Tripper)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
104. Actually "second to last" in Vaudeville
was the best spot on the show to be. You were in fact, the opening act for the show closer, the one everyone came to see, and you had to "warm up" the audience for that act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
89. Penultimate - adj - Coming next-to-last in a sequence.
- Coming next-to-last in a sequence.

In a sequence of events, the penultimate event is the one that precedes the final event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm sorry but he did it long before last night.
I know that Jon himself has said many times that he considers himself an entertainer first and foremost, but he has also acknowledged his role as a critic of the media. He has been delivering some of the best and most honest critiques of our corporate/media nightmare for years.

Hopefully you remember his role in effectively ending CNN's Crossfire, and his role in terminally wounding Tucker Carlson's career.

I appreciate the broader point you are making though - Jon is representative of a unique new journalism. Under the mask of "comedy" he has become this generations Edward R. Murrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
53. He's a hybrid,
something that's not been seen before. The comparisons to Frost aren't quite accurate, since Frost wasn't much more than a variety show host, with very little of his own act to his credit. He mostly introduced people and had a talk show that was carried, more or less, by the guests.

Stewart, first and foremost, knows how to handle himself in close situations, but, don't forget - he has brilliant writers and he did a lot of stand-up, which is great training for what he did with Cramer. Keep in mind, though, that everything that was said last night had been, for the most part, scripted. And that's the work of the writers. Stewart's delivery was dead on, and his own sophistication, intelligence, and sharp wit kept the pitch so high even dogs couldn't hear it.

But, as for him being of Murrow's caliber - no. I remember Murrow, and he was, first and foremost, a reporter. Back then, they were called "reporters," before the much fancier "journalist" became the buzzword. Murrow did his own legwork, and wrote his own copy. Stewart works with a team.

That's a huge difference that even Jon Stewart would agree to, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #53
63. Frost was on "That Was The Week That Was"
TW3 was the Daily Show of the Kennedy years. Originally on the BBC then came to the states. Basic format was a pseudo news program taking potshots at the powerful with kind of a Laugh-In quality. That it didn't last more than a couple of seasons in each incarnation is more a reflection of TV network policy than the quality of the show.

That he eventually became Sir David lays down a marker for Jon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. TW3 was hilarious
They paved the way for Monty Python, but they went away too quickly. Yes, they were 'way ahead of the times, what they were doing and saying. Much the same as with Tom Lehrer, whose retirement was, sadly, occasioned by the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to Henry Kissinger.

But, as for the kind of talent needed to do what Jon Stewart does - no, Frost never had it. They're in two different worlds, in that respect, and even at his best, Front was a sorry and far second to Stewart.

Well, we all know how the knighthood business works, don't we? Comparable to how it's done for the Hollywood Walk of Fame.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #53
94. My partner and I have had this discussion many,many times about the effectiveness
of John's humor. We think it stems from the fact that, first, John is always dead on in his assessment and second, when delivered in a humorous way, it is very difficult to retaliate without looking like an ass that's retaliating. It's generally a lose/lose situation for the attackee. If they respond they look like they are arguing and being mean when john was just being 'funny' and yet if they don't, they look like wuss'. It's perfect and that's why I think many comedians are such effective 'pundits', if you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
14. If rush limbaugh is the new spokesman for......
the republican party, may I be the first one to nominate Jon Stewart as the spokesman for the Peoples Party? Yeah, I know, I was supposed to say the Democratic Party this being the Democratic Underground after-all but imo Mr. Stewert speaks for more than just us Dems!
Welcome to the DU Rider Haggard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dammit Ann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
15. LOOK at you! Brand new and on the Greatest!
You should be proud, it's a tough audience. Keep 'em coming, we love a good voice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
92. agreed, it is tough to get on the front page, I've done it maybe 6-10 times, and I'm not trying, but
the point is, you have to be writing something that is relevant and/or inspiring to be getting your comments on there, and to have under 50 posts and get a 100 recs is AWESOME - they should be proud. They spoke something that really makes a lot of us say, "yep!"

Nice of you to congratulate them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
17. Welcome to DU. Keep posting! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. It reminded me of when he took down Tucker & Paul Begala on Crossfire!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. Good post. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
20. Not new for Stewart-- did you not see his CNN takedown ...
specifcally-Crossfire-- several years ago. A thing of beauty....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. We need to nominate Stewart for the next Edward R. Morrow Award.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
23. Nope
He did it to CNN back in 2004.

http://arstechnica.com/old/content/2005/01/4509.ars

Jon Stewart wins, CNN cancels Crossfire

CNN has canceled Crossfire, and the president of the network gives proper respect to Jon Stewart's chastising of the show. And Tucker needs a new bridge to live under.

By Ken Fisher | Last updated January 6, 2005 2:37

Ken Fisher

In the middle of October, Jon Stewart took his usual complaints about partisan hackery to his appearance on CNN's Crossfire (transcript here | streaming video here). From the beginning of the discussion, Stewart took aim at Crossfire and other media shows, saying (at first with a smile) that they "hurt America" by making politicians' lives easier by failing to "hold their feet to the fire." The gist of Stewart's complaint was that shows that were purportedly "hard" and "cutting" were really only theatrical performances of talking points and sensationalism. The incident is now famous, and little needs to be said about it. I'm following up that story because it was so popular when we ran it before.

Today CNN announced that they are nixing Crossfire, and dropping their relationship with one of the show's "commentators" (I use that word lightly), Tucker Carlson (who claims that he actually quit months ago). CNN's new President, Jonathan Klein, said that he agreed with much of Stewart's indictments against the media. So sayeth the New York Times:

Mr. Klein specifically cited the criticism that the comedian Jon Stewart leveled at "Crossfire" when he was a guest on the program during the presidential campaign. Mr. Stewart said that ranting partisan political shows on cable were "hurting America." Mr. Klein said last night, "I agree wholeheartedly with Jon Stewart's overall premise." He said he believed that especially after the terror attacks on 9/11, viewers are interested in information, not opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. Not Frost...Murrow
Frost was able to get Nixon to admit his crimes years after the fact. Stewart did a Murrow. His dressing down of Greed Central and Cramer was equivelent to Murrow taking on Joe McCarthy and his exposure of the "red scare". While Murrow didn't say it, last night, Jon had a "sir, do you have no decency" moment.

Yes, he crossed a line that was desperately needed. It's been a long time since we've experienced a moment of such candor and straight talk. Jon wasn't the first. There are many others out there who said the same thing, but they didn't have a national TV show with a large audience to expose. The corporate media was also exposed...being both negligent in holding their own accountable and ignoring a story that had a profound effect on millions.

Thank goodness Jon has the cajones to go over that line...and a shame on the many corporate "journalists" who knew what was happening and either were intimidated or just plain lazy to expose such a big scam.

Cramer tried to show decency...and I give him props for taking this trashing like a man, but will others also eat crow or will Stewart become a target?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Yeah and Stewart unlike Frost or Murrow got to drop the f bomb several times.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. "It's not a fucking game"...
was maybe the most important line of the night. Words have meaning, and sometimes the right expletive at the right time is just what's needed.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Boy, Do I Agree With That, Sid!
His use of that expletive was perfect in its timing and power.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
75. Agreed. And not the first time the comparison has been valid. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
102. Not Frost or Murrow - Mike Wallace.
That interview was much in the tradition of Wallace on 60 Minutes in the 70s, when he was at his absolute toughest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
27. In the immortal words of Charlie Murphy: "He's a habitual line-stepper."
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
28. Jon's pwnage of Cramer was a thing of beauty!
That, my friends, was real journalism, not MSM crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
31. Your Title Got My Back Up
But, then i read your post. Nice one! And welcome to DU.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. Good post and welcome to DU!...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
34. His "court jester" status enables him to be far more forward in his
accusations then being a "journalist" as it is currently defined by the media that we have...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. I think Cramer knew what was going to happen.
I'll tip my hat to Cramer in that "he took it like a man."

He didn't whine and never tried the same excuse twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. he's very nervous... some of the info in those clips is actionable..
"the SEC doesn't understand"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
37. Jon was the second to last journalist thursday evening? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Yes, I used the wrong word.
And should be chastised for it. :)

Doh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrZeeLit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
39. I read Alessandra Stanley in the NYT today, writing about Stewart/Cramer. She really thinks
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 11:06 AM by DrZeeLit
Cramer will be the "winner" and that Stewart was out of line.

Where the HELL do these people live that they do NOT know how ANGRY the American Public is????
Every show, except KO and Rachel, seems to be in some la la land where any minute everything is gonna be all right.
Or... everything isn't at all bad. OR... we're all just buttoned down and nodding an affirmative to the Repub "No" Machine.

Doesn't Ms. Stanley (I'll go check her name again after I post, because I'm having crashing problems if I move from tab to tab on my browser)(yep, it's Stanley)(she's been a t.v. critic for the NYT for ages, but she's a stuffed shirt)....
Doesn't she READ the polls?
They just don't believe that we are all TOTALLY PISSED OFF, do they?
They're all tsk-tsking about Madoff and all the poor billionaires/millionaires who lost their shirts with this guy, when MILLIONS of regular ol' hardworking (not to disparage millionaires and billionaires who work, but..) people HAVE LOST JOBS and HOMES and RETIREMENT and HEALTH CARE and COLLGE FUNDS and SAVINGS.

Thank goodness for Jon Stewart and his platform -- somebody has to say it...THEY ARE CRIMINALS. Somebody has to pull the veil off the mannequin and give us the truth!!

These shows and these politicians who think we're all just waiting for the stock market to go up and we'll get back to the malls and our little lives... whoa, they have to wake up. They really have to wake up.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. hmmm... maybe you
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 11:34 AM by dana_b
(and I) should let Ms. Stanley know what you think. I agree- these people want us to hush and play nice. B.S! That's what got us here in the first place.

edit*
Okay - so I just wrote a silly comment:
Ms. Stanley,
What you failed to state is that although Jon Stewart is primarily a comedian, he is also the only one in the media with the guts to say anything to these “entertainment” money shows or hold any of them accountable. No one else of “real” journalistic integrity has done so. Why is that? People have put their faith in these unscrupulous buffoons and have lost a lot. Everyone is focusing on Madoff and his victims, but what about the millions across the country who don’t have millions of dollars but who have lost their jobs, 401Ks, almost everything they have? They are MAD and these people handing out unsound advice need to be held responsible for what they say. Especially those with very large audiences. “In Cramer We Trust” - puhleeze… he did NOT win the war last night, Ms Stanley, and it shouldn’t be a case of them against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrZeeLit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
62. AWESOME! That's terrific! I love it! You are my hero!!!!! xoxoxox
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
41. Yes, he showed the "real" journalists how to do it.
After a day of frustration watching the news actors interview Republican politicos, allowing them to lie and obfuscate without challenging them with the follow up questions to make them explain what they claim to get at the truth, what Jon did made me want to have his baby. There were a couple of extra follow-up questions I would have asked but he did a brilliant job nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
44. "Penultimate" means "second to last." "Antepenultimate" means third to last. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I now know.....
Please people, forgive me. I used the word incorrectly.

I'm beginning to feel like Cramer in a room full of Jon Stewarts because of that damned choice of a word. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. That's OK--but I am a college English teacher, and I see it a dozen times a term in students'
essays.

BTW, I also thought you'd like to have the word "antepenultimate" as part of the set, which is the only reason I chimed in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #48
106. What about peoples use of the word "decimated"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #45
58. basically only people who study Greek, Latin or some other language that
need it for accenting on syllables know what it means.

You should have said that you are expecting Jon to climb to even higher sites, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
46. he has been doing this for years... he killed the CNN show Crossfire when he took it on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #46
55. One of my all time favorite clips, along with
Colbert's speech at the Washington correspondent's dinner. Tucker Carlson has never receovered from Jon Stewart's criticisms. Carlson's career arc took a swift turn downward in a matter of minutes.
Now, let's get Rush in front of Stewart or Colbert and let his fans see their emperor has no clothes. Yikes. That's an ugly visual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #55
111. i would love for one of them to accept Rush's debate invitation, on behalf of our President
But I think it better be Stewart, Colbert always uses sarcasm and Rush won't understand WTF he is trying to say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
47. I hope he continues to demonstrate both sides of his persona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
49. God bless Jon Stewart, but isn't it telling of how pathetic the media is in the US today
When you get a more realistic analysis of the news from a comedian on Comedy Central than on any of the actual news programs (with the possible exception of MSNBC's evening lineup)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. YES! That's the saddest aspect of all this...
...I think part of the decline of newspapers has been fueled by the public's shrinking respect for modern journalism. People are just tired of the bullshit, the obfuscation and journalists putting personal glory above journalistic ideals.

The Fourth Estate has failed due to corruption on both personal and institutional levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
50. Unlike the MSM talking heads, it doesn't seem that Jon "prepares" by huffing hairspray...
before every show. He's also got one hell of a talented staff of writers and producers who support what he does. The whole concept of the show is pretty damn subversive - at least when compared to the MSM model.

TDS was one of very few bashing *, his maladministration, the Republic Congress, Wall St. and the banks before it was cool anywhere but DU. In fact, back when I was watching regularly, it seemed many of the daily topics were exactly the things being discussed right here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
54. I thought of Frost too
Frost like Jon Stewart was not a "serious journalist" - he was more a proto-Larry King at that time than anything else, but somebody incredibly rising to the occasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sazemisery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
57. He did the same thing when he was on Crossfire
If you had not seen this, here is the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFQFB5YpDZE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
59. He is now a comedic JOURNALIST!
He is more of a journalist than any of the anchors on any of the networks with "real" news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
60. Smart people are always funny.
Ever notice how conservatives have no sense of humor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
61. Truly, Stewart was Moyeresque!
welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
67. Yeah, but the more "hard" he gets, the more the people he needs to confront will avoid him.
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 05:43 PM by Evoman
Thats the curse, and it's part of the reason the media is so fucked and allows shit to go past unquestioned. That's why you'll barely ever see the really powerful and important people on shows like Bill Maher. The media goes easy on these people, and they keep access. They put on the pressure, they lose access.

Of course, when you have the truth on your side, maybe you don't need access. Good research is more important anyways. But repugs will probably now be more cautious about going on Stewarts show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
74. Jon Stewart did us a great service!!! Cheers to him!!
:fistbump::applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
76. Stewart, Maddow and even Olbermann are
becoming forces to be reckoned with. They are forcing those that call themselves MSM to stand up and take notice.

Ha, ha..ha..:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
80. I was so afraid he was going to be a wuss - but HE WAS BRILLIANT!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhaTHellsgoingonhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
81. Remember Crossfire's demise?????
Cramer should have done his homework. He has no one to blame but himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
82. Crossed what Line? I have been getting more real news from TDS for years now
Instead of Runaway bride or Octomom like you see highlighted on CNN, FAUX etc:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
84. I'm totally with you...
About damn time someone grew a pair and said what needs to be said. Denying the obvious just focuses a laser on commercial news organization's lack of ethics and professional standards.

Sadly there are so few legitimate "news" organizations anymore (beholden to no one), that it does not surprise me in the least that the most honest "newscast" of the last eight years occurred on the Comedy Channel last evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
85. Yea for Jon and D.L.

I am so tired of all these Andrea Mitchell and Mourning Joe clowns telling us what to think and how to think like they do ---

It is not rocket science to ask a question and keep at it in an honest way until you get closer to the truth.

Jon Steward and D.L. are doing a fantastic job - yes they are comedians but they are able to see the world with different eyes.

Go get um Jon and D.L.

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #85
110. It's too bad DL got canceled.
I don't think they gave him enough time to pick up and audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #110
112. I didn't know that- oh no!
:cry:

Do you think it is because he was getting too tough with his interviews?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #112
114. No. I think he just didn't have enough time to establish himself.
They did very little in terms of promoting his show. I think MSNBC should pick him up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #114
115. I hope MSNBC picks him up ~ he has really grown
and I like his style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
88. Yes indeed. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
95. So you're sayin' he wont get any more guests?
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 01:28 AM by JohnnyRingo
Actually, I'm saying that.
That's how it works in the cable news bubble. If you hold someone's feet to the fire, you'll be interviewing the OctoMom.

The pols will dodge your show like it's a time share seminar.
They'll avoid an appearance like Jared at an all night breakfast buffet.

There's a reason Rachel Maddow can't get a guest from the opposition party, and now Stewart will settle for the company of no one to the right of Michael Moore.

I don't like the way that works, but even I, as a democrat steeped in liberal values, wouldn't go on Hannity's show if he donated $1,000 to MoveOn.org in Alec Baldwin's name.

That's just how it works these days, and I for one can live with liberal guests on The Daily Show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
96. He was the adult to the bratty TV News hairdo's before
Sad that it takes a comedian to tell truth to power. There are others who are just as patriotic, but not near enough to save this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobTheSubgenius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
97. I guess I'm a bit of an apostate here.
First....let me say that I can't get enough Jon Stewart. I think he's brilliant, funny, and has genuine humility that's sometimes disguised as "Hollywood Humble," but it's really there. I think I was the only person that actually watched his talk show, too.

So, this is not at all about JS and his performance. He was articulate, stuck to his message and was civil to boot. I just think that Cramer didn't come off as bad as people would like to have seen, at least in his "performance." True, some of that tape from 2006 was pretty hard to explain away, though. In fact, I don't think enough was made of the cynicism it must take to not only think that way, but to say it out loud.

However, I also don't think for one minute that he is the biggest villain in this whole clusterfuck, and he deserves at least a few props for having the jam to show up and take what he must have known was coming. He took it with some measure of dignity and didn't try to bluster his way out of it at all.

Clearly, YMMV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
98. He is cutting edge stuph,,,able to leap tall opponents in a single laff.
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 02:55 AM by opihimoimoi
Cutting Edge Stuphs is 10X more Powerful than regular "Stuffs"

Jon is the New Kid on the Block in a Profound way....From Silliness Reality to Series Correctional Journalism...Result...the Peeps are Ecstatically happy

OMG...who woulda thought....the Mighty Pub Party brought down by Comedians and a Variety Show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brucie Kibbutz Donating Member (704 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
99. "penultimate" journalist?
He's the next to last journalist? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
100. damn--an hour too late to recommend! well, i'm here in spirit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zomgidiftl Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
107. I say that it was totally overrated; Stewart is the Ray Romano of politcal humor:
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 03:50 PM by zomgidiftl
pleasant but not offensive. Predigested for the masses and the intellectuals who enjoy mild humor. Me? I am more into the edgy comics like Bill Maher and Chris Rock. They aren't always politically correct, but they push the envelope.

That so-called ambush was a whole lot of nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
108. As Jon Stewart said at the end of his Thurs. show
maybe now he can get back to making funny faces and fart noises:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
109. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
113. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC