Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Toxicity. The interview of the year and MSNBC seems to be strangely quiet about it. (Cramer/Stewart)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 04:59 PM
Original message
Toxicity. The interview of the year and MSNBC seems to be strangely quiet about it. (Cramer/Stewart)
I was at least thinking "Tweety" would have to comment. I'm hoping Keith or Rachel will. This thing (the interview has been burning up the "internets" since the interview occurred. Beforehand, they were all talking about it. After the interview... Crickets.

I don't believe that even Rush or Hannity touched this. BUT.

We'll talk about Nicole, the border, anything except the ramifications of last night's showdown with Jon and Cramer. That is if the "we" is a corporate owned media station.

It appears that Jon may have shown his viewers more than they, or even he, bargained for.

I'll have to give up a little for Jim Cramer. I just watched the interview again and paid special attention to Cramer's body language. He came onto the set defeated. He tried to appease Jon at every turn. And there was something else. Something else.

I really feel he wanted to spill the beans on something and just couldn't take a deep enough breath to steel his resolve. Cramer knew he'd done wrong and he was there to take the first dose of medicine. Only the first dose but he behaved and looked as if there were other doses coming. god knows what, but before all is said and done, I think he'll get it and we'll know what the medicine was for.

I may be totally wrong on this but I work at home and I've been bouncing back and forth between CNN and MSNBC and have barely heard a mention. Any day of the week you can check out DU's greatest page and get an idea of what the cable news channels will be speaking about that evening.

Not this time.

I think Jon may have upset a lot of "important" people and they are trying to make last night go away as quickly as possible. If it weren't for the fact that Viacom is hoping for higher advertising revenues, I doubt we'd see that much of the interview on the CC website.

So congratulations again, Jon. Last night you weren't the penultimate journalist of the day. You were the ultimate. And I believe you became toxic to some people with money.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if it will be discussed on Meet The Press.....Bwahahahahaha, I kill me....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It appears as if we aren't the only ones to notice it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5248615

I have left Tweety for the moment to see if Wolfie or Cafferty will mention it. If they do, I doubt it will be much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. you one funny guy alrightly!!. . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's called GUILT and COMPLICITY n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. He wanted to "give up something more".....
like with someone who wants to, how do you say it, "turn states evidence" in order to receive a shorter/reduced sentence/penalty?

Is THAT what you mean/are going for?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That was MY thought as well. . I think the stuff on those clips was actionable. . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rider Haggard Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It's just my gut feeling after watching it again.
I got the feeling last night, but after a 2nd viewing, I really do believe so.

I'm watching his show now and his voice and body languages are completely different. His voice is down half an octave and hhe's back into an "alpha" sort of behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Stewart showed clips from this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x282460

Cramer whispered that "SEC regulators are looking into that"....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. They got shamed
They suck so bad at covering the facts and they got trumped by Jon. They think if they avoid talking about it, it will go away. Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Remember gray, 'those' people don't know shame......
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 05:33 PM by Mind_your_head
as Cramer evidenced yesterday. He feigned *shame*, but he just wanted to get out of the uncomfortable position and MOVE ON. And Cramer HOPED that by feigning shame/regret he would get *lost* in the weekly news cycle.

*WE* can't let that happen. Hold their feet/their words to the fire EVERY day/all-the-time.

BTW, thank you Jon Stewart for the leadership on this :hi:

Your 'interview' :yourock:

edit: forgot to spell-check before I posted :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. By shamed, I meant "ratings threat." hahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Okay.......
Hey, I'm not gonna "go on about it", but I thought you "released the duck"!

It's well past the time to let it fly, imo. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Never!
He's a helpless dork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Message received. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC