Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cramer admits to market manipulation on video - being investigated - Bush admits to illegal wiretaps

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:50 PM
Original message
Cramer admits to market manipulation on video - being investigated - Bush admits to illegal wiretaps
in front of the national press corps on video - they change the law to make it all legal and sweep it under the rug...

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish people would stop saying that.
Cramer admitted to no such thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sounded like it to me... he better hope I'm not on his jury...
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ditto.
I'd like to make a RUN FOR his jury!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You won't be....because he didn't break the law.
...and even if he did, he's got plenty of wiggle room.

That's why it's silly to say that he "admitted to market manipulation"...a blatant admission of guilt would be the ONLY way he'd ever be charged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Well you need to get the batteries changed in your hearing aids then...
he was bragging about it on the video that Stewart played and people go to jail for less obvious statements on wiretaps all the time in drug cases.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Ok, we'll see.
There's NO way that was an admission that he actually broke the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. He admitted to manipulating the markets in a very obviously illegal way
to drive the price the way he wanted it to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. No, he "presented a hypothetical".
Everybody who saw him or knows what he does knows the truth, but he did NOT actually ever admit to any illegal activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Not what I heard....he admitted to manipulating stocks for his hedge fund.
It was very clear to me you can stop the defending already nobody believes you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I'm not defending him...we just have different impressions of what he said.
Personall, I don't care what you believe. I'm simply stating that no court in the country would convict him based on his statements because what he said wasn't actually an admission of guilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yeah and YOURS is WRONG...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Well, opinions are like assholes.
You can find one anyplace you go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Except It's NOT an opinion you are simply being obtuse and trying to turn this into he said she said
You are a flat earther my friend who refuses to hear the words clearly spoken in front of him.

:eyes:

The guy confessed - he belongs in JAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Whatever.
Frankly, this is a small-potatoes issue. If Cramer even gets charged on such a flimsy "admission of guilt", I'll buy you a star or something.

It's my opinion that this is just another minor issue that some DUers have chosen to blow out of proportion, but I'll freely admit I'm wrong (and pay up) if he's charged...even if he's not found guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. I sure am getting sick and tired of people calling others
"silly" on this goddamned forum!

Just because people have different ideas that you do, that doesn't mean that they are "silly"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I didn't call him silly, I said that the statement was silly.
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 11:37 PM by MercutioATC
...because "silly" is a nicer word than "asinine"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He appeared to admit it
on the old video. He tried to un-admit it live, with Stewart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Listen to the entire video of Cramer (not TDS)
of which only clips were shown on TDS.

He admits to the illegality and poor SEC oversight and describes specifically what techniques used tp manipulate the market for specific stocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Yes, but he never actually admits to any personal illegal actions.
Hence, my issue with people saying that he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yes he DID stop making up crap.. we all saw the interview
the guy belongs in jail for what he ADMITTED to doing - manipulating stocks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Imagine if Blago said....
"I made sure that the only people I considered for the Senate were people who did me favors. That's legal. I also think all Governors should charge as much money as they can for Senate seats. That's illegal, but in these times, no one will bust you for it and I think all Governors need to do it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. DING DING DING - we have a winner!
Well said AND DUZY worthy...

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. but but but persoanl responsibilityyyyyyyyyy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. The point is that Cramer never actually admitted to anything.
Blago didn't admit to breaking the law, either.

Both should suffer professional consequences, but neither actually admitted breaking the law...regardless of how many ways people try to interpret their words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Bullshit.. they BOTH did, they need to be cellmates.
You are out of your mind.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Look, proving Blago's guilt would have been easy. Nobody tried.
A simple sting asking him to appoint somebody in exchange for something would have determined whether he was seriously intending to break the law or if he was just blustering.

Nobody even tried.


Since Blago never actually broke the law and there's not even any proof of conspiracy to do so, he doesn't belong in prison.

(That's the way we do things here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Rod? Rod Blagojevich? Is that YOU:?
Give us all a break... the only way you would apparently ever vote to convict someone is if they actually committed the crime directly in front of you - not even confessing on video tape is good enough for you.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. Blago did nothing compared to the damage Cramer has done to millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Cramer only "damaged" those gullible enough to believe him.
If you're going to blindly take the advice of people like Cramer...or Dr. Phil...or that obnoxious guy who sells the ShamWow...you kinda deserve what you get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. So basically you're saying the unscrupulous can prey on the stupid...
who deserve what they get. It's a good prescription for rolling back that cumbersome burden of civilization. Hell, if the Aztecs were dumb enough to think Cortez was the embodiment of a god come according to prophecy, that's their tough shit when he burns their cities, right?

A liar's still a liar, no matter how gullible those who believe him. And given how his description of stock manipulation practices sounds like he's talking about things he did, and given the astonishing tendency for him to do things like drive people into stocks that tank the very next week, the matter of whether Cramer lied in the course of criminal conspiracy to defraud investors is very much an open question that must be addressed by investigators who match his tips against possible market manipulations by his fund, his cronies, and companies who profited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. Not in a legal way - he just made it obvious that he did it and was still doing it...
and he has rightly invited the scrutiny of investigators who should now match up all of his tips and "news" on that horrible show and compare it to the investment decisions made by his former fund and friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. and the GOP Media Establishment doesn't even pause between Big Pharm Commercials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC