Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chrysler Canada rejects GM-CAW “pattern,” demands even greater concessions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:21 AM
Original message
Chrysler Canada rejects GM-CAW “pattern,” demands even greater concessions
By Carl Bronski
14 March 2009

Chrysler President Tom LaSorda announced Wednesday evening that the Detroit-based automaker is determined to break the "pattern" concessions contract that the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) union just negotiated with failing auto giant General Motors.

In testimony before the House of Commons finance committee in Ottawa concerning Chrysler's appeal for $2.3 billion (Cdn) in bailout funds, LaSorda called the GM deal "unacceptable" and threatened that Chrysler might close all of its Canadian-based plants unless the company received much deeper concessions from the CAW than had been surrendered to General Motors. He also demanded favourable government treatment on an ongoing $1 billion dispute over back taxes and that the bailout funds be paid in American rather than Canadian currency.

Currently, Chrysler has 9,400 employees in Canada. Another 26,000 are employed at dealerships across the country. The Chrysler brief to the parliamentary committee stated that including pensioners and workers in the supply chain, over 100,000 Canadians are dependent on the company's continued viability. Analysts have suggested that Chrysler is even more vulnerable to bankruptcy than its General Motors rival.


http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/mar2009/chry-m14.shtml




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bad news
The CAW usually makes one deal with either Chrysler, GM or Ford and the others accept the basic terms for future agreements.

I suspect that Chrysler and GM are in cahoots on this one. If the CAW makes a bigger concession to Chrysler, then GM will demand a re-negotiation.

It's yet another "race to the bottom" that will end up hurting workers.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree.
It's a shell game at this point. This is awful. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StreetKnowledge Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not the time to be hellraising with the CAW, Tom
They are already taking big doses of "it's for the best" with the GM deal. They aren't so stupid that they will negotiate a lower deal, because then GM will come back to them with their hands out again. They aren't dumb, Tom. Take what you can get. And if you really are dumb enough to close the Windsor and Brampton plants, you not only are stupid with regards to labor relations, you will also result in lower quality cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC