Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glenn Greenwald: The success of drug decriminalization in Portugal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 09:28 AM
Original message
Glenn Greenwald: The success of drug decriminalization in Portugal
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/03/14/portugal/

The success of drug decriminalization in Portugal


In 2001, Portugal became the only EU-member state to decriminalize drugs, a distinction which continues through to the present. Last year, working with the Cato Institute, I went to that country in order to research the effects of the decriminalization law (which applies to all substances, including cocaine and heroin) and to interview both Portuguese and EU drug policy officials and analysts (the central EU drug policy monitoring agency is, by coincidence, based in Lisbon). Evaluating the policy strictly from an empirical perspective, decriminalization has been an unquestionable success, leading to improvements in virtually every relevant category and enabling Portugal to manage drug-related problems (and drug usage rates) far better than most Western nations that continue to treat adult drug consumption as a criminal offense.

On April 3, at 12:00 noon, at the Cato Institute in Washington, I'll be presenting the 50-page report I wrote for Cato, entitled Drug Decriminalization in Portugal. Following my presentation, a supporter of drug criminalization laws -- Peter Reuter, a Professor in the University of Maryland's Department of Criminology -- will comment on the report (and I'll be able to comment after that), and then there will be a Q-and-A session with the audience. The event is open to the public and free of charge. Details and registration are here at Cato's site, where the event can also be watched live online (and, possibly, on C-SPAN).

There is clearly a growing recognition around the world and even in the U.S. that, strictly on empirical grounds, criminalization approaches to drug usage and, especially, the "War on Drugs," are abject failures, because they worsen the exact problems they are ostensibly intended to address. "Strictly on empirical grounds" means excluding from the assessment: (a) ideological questions regarding the legitimacy of imprisoning adults for consuming drugs they choose to consume; (b) the evisceration of Constitutional and civil liberties wrought by drug criminalization; and (c) the extraordinary sums of money devoted to the War on Drugs both domestically and internationally.

Very recent events demonstrating this evolving public debate over drug policy include the declaration of the Drug War's failure from several former Latin American leaders; a new Economist Editorial calling for full-scale drug legalization; new polls showing substantial and growing numbers of Americans (and a majority of Canadians) supportive of marijuana legalization; the decision of the DEA to make good on Obama's campaign pledge to cease raids on medical marijuana dispensaries in states which have legalized its usage; and numerous efforts in the political mainstream to redress the harsh and disparate criminal penalties imposed for drug offenses, including Obama's support for treatment rather than prison for first-time drug offenders.

Particularly in the U.S., there is still widespread support for criminalization approaches and even support for the most extreme and destructive aspects of the "War on Drugs," but, for a variety of reasons, the debate over drug policy has become far more open than ever before. Portugal's success with decriminalization is highly instructive, particularly since the impetus for it was their collective recognition in the 1990s that criminalization was failing to address -- and was almost certainly exacerbating -- their exploding, poverty-driven drug crisis. As a consensus in that country now recognizes, decriminalization is what enabled them to manage drug-related problems far more effectively than ever before, and the nightmare scenarios warned of by decriminalization opponents have, quite plainly, never materialized.

The counter-productive effects of drug criminalization are at least as evident now for the U.S. as they were for pre-decriminalization Portugal. Beyond one's ideological beliefs regarding the legitimacy of criminalization, drug policy should be determined by objective, empirical assessments of what works and what does not work. It's now been more than seven years since Portugal decriminalized all drugs, and dispassionately examining the effects of that decision provides a unique opportunity to assess questions of drug policy in the most rational and empirical manner possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. The War on Drugs has been a huge success for
those at the top of the chain - the same people who promoted that bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. yes the war-on-drugs industrial complex which includes the prisons has be extremely profitable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I always call it "Nixon's Revenge"
he started the fucking "war on drugs." This war tends to focus on minorities, the poor and young. Nixon's enemies. It is also another way to funnel huge federal dollars to rich cronies. Pretty much what any self-respecting republican would want to accomplish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Absolutely correct n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Billions are being made by both drug sellers and DEA
DEA justifies all it's revenues by "War on Drugs" and are allowed to confiscate whatever they like in fighting that "war".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Criminalization means Big Profits for Criminals.
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 03:16 PM by Octafish
And that's good for Big Business Fraudsters and Warondrugmongers.



The Real Deal: The Ultimate New Business Cold Call
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R!
The "war on drugs" is so fucking absurd.

Time to wake and bake! :hippie:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Marking for later read
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. Video - Who's winning the war on drugs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. To me the legalization of drugs is a
no-brainer. But most Americans are willfully-ignorant. I think the PTB want to keep them illegal so they can make $$$ off the prison system and also to keep young Black men in jail.

And don't tell me that the PTB don't bring these drugs into the country in the first place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I have no doubt this is correct. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. A video documentary about the war on drugs from Dutch TV.
The initial comments for the first minute or so are in Dutch, after that it switches to English with Dutch subtitles.
The documentary explain how police forces and governments profit from the war on drugs through asset seizure laws and also the increasing need for inmates by the for-profit prison system.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=864268000924014458&ei=1LKSSdz6LJ7OqwL715W9Cw&q=dutch+war+on+drugs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. If heroin were suddenly legal, would you go buy some & inject it
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 04:19 PM by SoCalDem
That's always been my retort..

The obvious answer is "OF COURSE, NOT!"

There is a certain sub-set of the populace that will ALWAYS "self-medicate", "push the boundaries".. In past times, these were of the avant garde, the artists, the musicians, the seekers, the ones at the fringe..

The percentages are probably the same as they have always been, and although the usage of drugs has always been "frowned" on, it's fairly recent (historically), that's it's been ultra-illegal..

The societal uproar probably parallels the same timeframe.:(

The massive amounts of money we've wasted trying to punish the addicted & ferret out their suppliers, could have been much better-spent, had we used a fraction of it to provide services to help these folks get over their addcitions, once they realized the needd to..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I have to ask this question, SoCalDem: would your cat have been in that fix if it had not
Edited on Sun Mar-15-09 12:00 AM by bertman
been using crystal meth??

That is the funniest cat picture I have ever seen. Any chance of getting the backstory?

Recommend this thread. We need to do something drastic about the abomination called the War on Drugs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Alas, that is not MY kitty.. but one of mine DID "tangle" with the chain
linking the vertical shadees....she had a tail deformity, and ended up "hanging" from the poor little coiled stub of a tail.. We had it surgically removed so she'd never get into that fix again.. she damned near pulled the blind down, with all her caterwauling & flailing around..

The blind-cat in my sig is a "fail" pic, that I "appropriated"..:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. Not just "No" but "HELL NO!"...
...I won't mince words: I always liked marijuana. I experimented with LSD and psilocybin as well. I had no problem with them and used a LOT of cannabis.

Due to a variety of factors, I've spent a good deal of time around other drugs, so I saw the effects of them on users. Those observations were enough. I've been offered plenty of free coke, meth, you name it and never hesitated to refuse it because I didn't like what it did to others.

Knowing a junkie is all you need to keep you away from smack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. And knowing an alcoholic is all it takes to keep you away from booze..
Oh, wait..

*Everybody* knows an alcoholic and yet about 75% of American adults consume booze.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Actually the times when I drank the least...
...were when I worked in bars. Being around drunks all night is disgusting.

Did I also mention that the junkies I knew were some of the strongest dissuaders of heroin's usage? "Don't ever mess with this shit, man."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Drank the least
Which means you were still drinking, just less.

And I agree, being around drunks if you aren't drinking yourself is not much fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, babylonsister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. Portugal isn't the US
I'm 100 percent against the so-called war on drugs and fully support decriminalization. I just want to stress that it would be a serious mistake to extrapolate the results in Portugal and apply them to the US. There are a lot of differences between the two countries.

Portugal has a more homogeneous population, doesn't have the income disparity we have, has universal health care, a tighter family culture, and I'm guessing some workable method of rehab.

So, decriminalizing drugs in the US will probably, at least over the short term, follow a different track -- and in some areas, problems may get worse before they start to get better. i.e. current addicts may increase their use and some fringe users may become more die-hard users. This will allow critics to point to the short-term results and declare it a failure, possibly leading to a re-criminalization.

Having said that, it's important to remember that the US previously went through this. We had a serious drug problem with gangs, gang violence, drive-by shootings, rampant illegal drug trafficking, corrupt public officials. And we made it go away almost overnight by repealing Prohibition.

Andrew Weil has the best solution that I can think of. Decriminalize drugs, make them all available for sale -- but prohibit them from being advertised anywhere. This would include such drugs as alcohol and tobacco.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. And don't forget, the size of Portugal makes it a whole
different dynamic. But even having the subject broached and considered in this country is a step in the right direction.

And it's been happening, purely for economic reasons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. The War on Drugs has had the same effects and results as Prohibition. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenichol Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. LEAP Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
This amazing organization of retired law enforcement officers AGAINST prohibition is one to help us. Our little non-profit, Peace and Justice of La Luz just requested a Speaker from their speakers' bureau to come speak at our local county fair. We'll be taking him to our local Chamber of Commerce, arrange some other meetings, etc.

http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php
See some of their youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LayaGk0TMDc

Also, the organization FAMM Families Against Mandatory Minimums, is active and fighting the mandatory minimums that fill up those private prisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
22. Local law enforcement nationwide would raise holy hell...
...It's too big a cash cow for them and allows them to act as highway robbers with badges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. If drugs were legal...
The price would much lower.

People wouldn't steal to get money to buy them.

There wouldn't be turf wars by those who sell them.

If people without chemistry degrees can make up batches in the kitchen, then the pharmaceutical companies wouldn't have a hard time with the formulation and could probably make common drugs that are currently illegal for pennies a dose. There is no patent, so everything would be generic and sell for dimes a dose. Those prices would be impossible for drug dealers to match and would put them out of business.

They could be taxed like tobacco and alcohol as additional national income.

They would be sold at drug stores or Alcoholic Beverage Control stores.
They would have to be sold on a totally "use at your own risk" to adults only (like alcohol) to avoid lawsuits.

They would have to have quality control which would make them less dangerous. Who knows what that stuff on the streets is cut with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. You are making the same arguments I have made for decades.
You can't kill the drug trade by suppression. However, if you take the profit out of it, it will go away. Elementary psychology. If addicts have a cheap, legal and safe source of their drugs, they will use it. There is then no incentive for a drug pusher to get anyone addicted, because he will have no return business. Drug users can perform at least menial labor while using. They can make contributions to society even if they can't kick their habits. Most of the harm done to society by drugs is actually secondary harm due to the illegality of drugs. People committing crimes to support an expensive addiction, gang turf wars, people going to prison for "graduate training" in deviant lifestyles, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. One exception there...
..."There is then no incentive for a drug pusher to get anyone addicted, because he will have no return business. "

After decriminalization, that pusher would be Madison Avenue on a completely wide open market. I'm all for decriminalization but I think we need to be realistic about what would happen under American-style capitalism and prepare ourselves for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I don't think we have to open the whole thing up to free-market forces.
How 'bout a ban on advertising, maybe even gov't run "drug stores?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldenuff Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
25. Stop the common sense..Stop it right now!

Who the heck invited common sense into the discussion.This will really piss of the Drug Warriors who are championing the War on Drugs,all the while profiting from it.Where the heck will they make their billions now?Bailouts?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. You mean folks like Joe Biden?...
...That drug warrior aspect of him has always turned me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillieW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. Let's move to Portugal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. keeked. too late to wreck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
34. While I abhor drug use personally, I agree
Decriminalization would reduce societal problems from drugs. The media will not allow this to inform the public and gov't will kneel to the fundies and the rough-ass Republicants who will yowl like scalded cats for "family values".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC