Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Children born to older fathers may have lower IQs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:07 AM
Original message
Children born to older fathers may have lower IQs
A new study on 33,000 young U.S. children found that those with older fathers had reduced cognitive abilities. In contrast, researchers found that children born to older mothers scored higher on cognitive tests.

Recent studies have drawn links between older fathers and specific health problems in their children, including birth deformities and cancer, as well as neuropsychiatric conditions such as autism and schizophrenia.

In the study, the researchers analysed data from intelligence tests taken by 33,437 children who were born between 1959 and 1965 in the United States.

The children were tested at 8 months, 4 years and 7 years and were assessed for their sensory discrimination, hand-eye coordination, reading, spelling and arithmetic ability.

They found that the older the father, the more likely the child would have lower scores on the various tests.

In contrast, the older the mother, the higher the scores of the child in the cognitive tests.


http://news.aol.com/health/article/older-fathers-iq/378694

Interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. So how do you explain redneck yahoos?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. They don't define "older"
I wonder how they define "older," 30's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. I was wondering about that too
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. Nor do they define "lower"
Edited on Sun Mar-15-09 10:59 AM by Thor_MN
Likely, there is a weak corelation where the overlap is far greater than the actual difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. hooyahhh. i married a younger man and had kids when i was older.
bah hahahha.

love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. So did I
I was 30 and he was 25 .... go figure ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. wink
the funny, ... we can play with it and have fun. (like anyone taking seriously). and so many dont think it is so cute. ah well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. seems like the reverse (an older man marrying younger woman)
might be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. like isnt that a duh...
lol lol. teasing.

there are lots of things i observe to not take this seriously, but sure fun to play with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Sometimes I feel like I haven't been born yet. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. that is funny....
well, it is all good. could work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Well, there is a joke about returning to the womb... I tried much
harder when I was a young bloke... now not so much. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. my youngest. he is 11 and i am STILL trying to shake off hip. lol lol
Edited on Sun Mar-15-09 10:01 AM by seabeyond
again, it is all good... most all just love the kid and gets away with so much, so not all bad there if pattern continues in life. that is funny. until i actually had a child like that, i would never have truly appreciated that saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. booyah... not hooyah. hubby corrected me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is crap
Anyone can manipulate data any way they want to. Was the age of the parents the sole factor under consideration? What about the mental abilities of the parents, or the economic status? Did they study nutrition and health care access in early childhood of the parents and the children as part of the tests? It goes on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. My father was 34 and my mother 29 when I was born. My IQ is above average.
Define "older" . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. I Doubt 34 and 29 are Considered "Older."
It's more like 40s, 50s, and older.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. LOL, back in the Fifties, it was . . . .
Women tried to get married as soon as they were emanicipated and start a family soon after the wedding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. "may" have lower IQs. Walking across my quiet street "may" get me killed, but
there's no direct cause and effect.

GD is in rare form today, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. Idiotic
My dad was 42 when I was born; mom was 22. I have two younger brothers, one of whom was born when dad was 50, and we're all uber-smart. No brag, just fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
F.C.James Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. The good news is children of older parents live longer n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. Alternative explanation:
Edited on Sun Mar-15-09 10:10 AM by lumberjack_jeff
Intelligent fathers tend to have children earlier in life. Intelligent mothers, later.

There's nothing in the article which suggests they tested the parents.

I don't know if it's researchers or reporters which are conflating correlation with causality.

There's a significant link between genetics and autism. It seems that the more "geeky" and "techy" the parents, the more likely that the children will have autism. In my experience, nerds like me marry and have children later in life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mecherosegarden Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. My father was 48 when I was born ...
and shock ! my mom was so very young :shrug:

No wonder I had such a hard time getting all those degrees... and The PsyD seems like and uphill battle .

I am almost there, but after reading this... I should stop cause I am not smart enough. Oh wait, that is why my spelling and writing skills sucks... because my dad was so old when I was born!

Me say... many studies are just bull :think: :think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
21. What is older? 30s? 40s? 50's? 60's70's? The article doesn't mention it. Journalism
at its worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
24. The funniest part about this thread is how few people (none?)
bothered to look for the study taking the article at "face value."

The study cites some very disturbing evidence of other issues with Advanced Paternal Age (APA) that isn't even touched in the original article.

I also find it entertaining to read the posters describing themselves as intelligent offspring of older fathers yet who didn't bother to spend the approximately 2 minutes it took to google the study and only replied "Nuh, uh! I'm brilliant as are my siblings!" If brilliant is defined as intellectually incurious and lazy mixed with a willingness to accept pablum packaged as "journalism," I guess they fit their definition.

The second paragraph in this snippet is most disturbing.

In recent decades there has been increased attention to health outcomes in the offspring of older fathers. Evidence shows that advanced paternal age (APA) is associated with an increased risk of a wide range of disorders <1>. While not discounting the influence of various age-related psychosocial factors that may translate to differential health outcomes for the offspring of older fathers (e.g., higher socioeconomic status, better education), advances in genomics have refocused attention on the vulnerability of sperm from older fathers to carrying de novo mutations. The development of the germ cell differs between human males and females—there are many more germline cell divisions in the life history of a sperm relative to that of an oocyte <2>. In the female there are 22 mitotic cell divisions that occur in utero. In contrast, after puberty, progenitor sperm stem cells undergo mitotic cell division once every 16 d. By age 20 the progenitor sperm cells have undergone approximately 150 cell divisions. By age 50 this number is 840. Thus, the chance of copy error mutations increases with age in males more dramatically than for females.

Advanced paternal age is associated with increased fetal deaths <3,4> and certain rare congenital syndromes (e.g., achondroplasia) <1,5>. In recent years evidence has accumulated linking APA with a wide range of neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions including Alzheimer's disease <6,7>, bipolar disorder <8>, dyslexia <9>, neural tube defects <10>, and epilepsy <11>. A sizeable body of evidence has accumulated linking APA with an increased risk of schizophrenia <12–18>. A recent meta-analysis based on eight studies found that paternal age above 35 was associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia <19>. There is also evidence linking APA to autism spectrum disorders <20–24>.

The associations between APA and outcomes such as autism and schizophrenia are of particular interest, as these disorders have recently been associated with genomic structural variation <25–30>. It is feasible that APA-related mechanisms may contribute to genomic structural variation (e.g., copy number variants, microdeletions) <2>. Thus, within the fields of schizophrenia and autism research, there has been an unexpected convergence between epidemiology and molecular biology.

While there is good evidence linking paternal age with several clinically distinct neurodevelopmental disorders, the evidence linking paternal age and other neurocognitive outcomes such as general intelligence is less robust. Earlier studies noted an association between APA and poorer performance on neurocognitive tests <31–34>. This issue has been addressed specifically in a recent study based on male and female Israeli conscripts (age 16–17 y, n = 44,175) <35>. The study found independent effects of paternal age on offspring intelligence with the lowest scores associated with both younger and older fathers (inverted “U”-shaped association). This finding is in contrast to the association between maternal age and offspring intelligence, where most studies have reported a linear association between older maternal age and superior neurocognitive ability <36–39>. Link to the study that is actually online




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. interesting. thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
25. So, baby boomers have lower IQs because their father was off in the war??
Hmmm... :dunce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
27. Link to study for anyone interested in more about methodology, limitations, etc.
http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?SESSID=e263c946ca0313413c8d5c9459ae6b53&request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000040

What Did the Researchers Do and Find?

The researchers gathered no new data but reanalyzed data on children from the US Collaborative Perinatal Project (CPP), which had used a variety of tests given to children at ages 8 months, 4 years, and 7 years, to measure cognitive ability—the ability to think and reason, including concentration, memory, learning, understanding, speaking, and reading. Some tests included assessments of “motor skills”—physical co-ordination.

The CPP dataset holds information on children of 55,908 expectant mothers who attended 12 university-affiliated hospital clinics in the United States from 1959 to 1965. The researchers excluded premature babies and multiple births and chose one pregnancy at random for each eligible woman, to keep their analysis simpler. This approach reduced the number of children in their analysis to 33,437.

The researchers analyzed the data using two models. In one, they took into account physical factors such as the parents' ages. In the other, they also took into account social factors such as the parents' level of education and income, which are linked to intelligence. In addition, the authors grouped the children by their mother's age and, within each group, looked for a link between the lowest-scoring children and the age of their father.

The researchers found that children with older fathers had lower scores on all of the measures except one measure of motor skills. In contrast, children with older mothers had higher scores. They found that the older the father, the more likely was this result found.


One caveat by the authors is that the intelligence measures only followed children through age 7 and the most pronounced differences were in the earliest ages. It may be that the children catch up as they grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I finally read it
Interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC