Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Downturn could kill 400,000 children, warns Margaret Chan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 10:46 AM
Original message
Downturn could kill 400,000 children, warns Margaret Chan
Downturn could kill 400,000 children, warns Margaret Chan
Margaret Chan: 'Past recessions have provided evidence of deaths'

Sam Lister, Health Editor



Thousands of women and children are dying as a direct consequence of the current economic crisis which is already derailing efforts to improve maternal care and cut child death rates, the head of the World Health Organisation has warned.

Speaking to The Times after a meeting of world leaders hosted by Gordon Brown yesterday, Margaret Chan, director-general of the WHO, said that risks posed by the credit crunch to poor nations were already taking hold.

Dr Chan said that an estimate of between 200,000 and 400,000 additional child deaths per year caused by the downturn was “entirely credible”. She called on world leaders to show solidarity and “walk the talk” of funding pledges to poorer nations.

“There is no reason why we should doubt that this {death toll} will happen if we fail to act,” Dr Chan said. “Because if we do not, more women will suffer or die because of complications arising from pregnancy and delivery, and more children will die because of lack of food or immunisation or poor water and sanitation.

“It is very clear. Past recessions have ample evidence to demonstrate the fact. And the two groups that are most vulnerable are women and children, especially girls.”

Dr Chan, a member of the Taskforce on Innovative International Financing for Health Systems, which also includes Mr Brown, Robert Zoellick, president of the World Bank, and eight other world leaders, added that she had already encountered evidence of worsening funding problems.

more...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5904637.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blackdot Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's natural selection.
Not to sound cruel but when a population over expands itself, it's only natural for it to die back when there is not enough resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. if it was NATURAL as you stated those using the most resources per capita
should die out first, not those using the least. This is not natural selection it is unnatural and an abomination!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC