can make it a useful model for a very racially diverse country. (I am including Hispanics as a "race" because office demographics do so in charting relative racial diversity).
I was struck by the extremely low representation of African Americans and Hispanic people and wondered if having a racially homogeneous population made it easier to engage in liberal initiatives.
I think Vermont's stand on civil is a fine one--but the fact remains that its African American population is said to be about 1%, and Hispanic population is similarly low. Certainly it is not and has never been a de jure racist state as many others have been--but is it a de facto one by virtue of being so racially homogeneous ? What does it mean to not be racist in states or places with few opportunites for day to day close contact with people of other races?
One of my questions is whether the better health for children, the health of citizens, and how it educates its children is actually easier to achieve partly because of its extreme lack of racial diversity.
Healthcare may be much more expensive in states which have had massively unequal rights in the past or have large immigrant populations and people may feel less of a "kinship" with neighbors in places where populations are more racially diverse and may thus be less inclined to engage in liberal initiatives.
For example, would Arizona have better healthcare is it had the demographics of Vermont? if it were 98 or 99% white or 99% latino or hispanic?
Certainly the advantages of the benefits in healthcare and education could make Vermont a choice place to live for members of minorities despite long winters.
Obviously the Somalis are not finding climate a deterrent. I think the outreach to African refugees is wonderful and wonder if outreach within the US might not have the same positive result. I think of the many positive results of affirmative action in education and wonder if it might not work in terms of community.
Many African Americans and Hispanic people live in rural areas-and enjoy what it has to offer and I think many people in large cities might also welcome such an opportunity.
My comment about the KKK was from a sermon by Gary Kowalski , a Burlington, Vermont Unitarian minister speaking in 2003 about the history of racism in Vermont and its modern presence.
<
http://www.uusociety.org/sermons/racism_9_28.htm}[br />
The disease is racism. And it’s hard to believe that such an unpleasant diagnosis could apply to our pleasant little state. We tend to picture Vermont
as a bucolic place, sheltered from the worst ills of the American society that surrounds us: clean, friendly and civic-minded for the most part. All these characterizations may be accurate. But it’s also true that Vermont harbors more than its share of bigotry.
Underneath the appearance of rustic innocence, prejudice abounds. Last spring, for instance, the Champlain Valley Office of Economic Opportunity conducted a study of bias in the housing market. CVOEO investigators posing as prospective home buyers visited various real estate offices across the state. Each one claimed to have similar income and savings. Each was looking for a house in the same price range. Each was dressed appropriately and spoke politely with the agent in making their request. The only difference between the two was that one of the investigators was black and the other one was white. In forty-eight percent of these visits, racial discrimination was obvious. African American customers were told they needed to get pre-approval for a mortgage before being shown a home, while the white customers didn’t need pre-approval. The black customers were told no homes were available in a certain locality, but the white customers were told of two houses available in the area "where the doctors live ... and next door to a famous author." Housing discrimination exists everywhere in America, but the level of bias measured in Vermont was three times the national average. After all, this is the whitest state in the Union, and more than a few people seem determined to keep it that way.
If only racism wore sheets and robes and pointed hats, it would be very easy to recognize. But all too often racism in Vermont wears a variety of more subtle masks that renders it invisible to most observers. When persons of color are shadowed by security personnel in downtown stores, it masquerades as good business practice. When African Americans are incarcerated in Vermont prisons in disproportionate numbers, it masquerades as the need for public order. When bills addressing harassment in the public schools stall in the statehouse, legislators explain that we have no race problem in Vermont and don’t need to clutter the statute books with laws aimed at imaginary issues. The masks are many, but they all conceal a meanness, a parochialism, an ingrown mentality that does disservice to the traditions of a great state.
I personally feel deep affection for Vermont. I love the landscape. I like the human scale of its institutions. I like Vermont’s ethos of hard work and self-help. And I also admire the history of its freedom loving people. We were the first in the nation to outlaw slavery in our state constitution. For our size, we offered up more soldiers in the Civil War that any other state in the union. And for all its inroads into our midst, we did manage to repulse the klan.
________snipped___________