Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barry Goldwater's influence on American conservatism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:38 PM
Original message
Barry Goldwater's influence on American conservatism
In 1964, people were shocked at what Goldwater was saying, and considered him a dangerous man and a radical conservative. He lost in a landslide to LBJ.

Yet what was more important was the grassroots organization that was formed and propelled Goldwater to the GOP nomination in 1964. His candidacy marked the sharp rightward turn of the GOP, and helped pave the way for Ronald Reagan, who gave a rousing address at the 1964 Republican National Convention.

What's ironic is that Goldwater would be considered a moderate by today's standards, at least in the GOP. How times change....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Barry Goldwater's influence on American conservatism gone is 60 seconds
Yeah, he'd be a Democrats in today's cpolitical spectrum. He used to be considered a Right wing nut job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Goldwater gave the Republicans a coherent ideological framework in defeat

It wasn't the grassroots organization but a workable worldview that Reagan could flesh out and populate with folksy stories.


Bush's legacy will be that he not only led the Republicans into a huge defeat but that he didn't seek out a party successor that would keep the disparate group of religious fanatics, establishment conservatives, economic conservatives and neocon nut jobs together.

His decision not to jetison Cheney and pick a heir apparent left the Republicans in their worst group dynamic - without a clear leader. Unbelievably McCain then assists this by picking Palin as VP nominee, creating even more confusion for future succession. Having grown up in a conservative Republican family and participating in Republican intercine succession fights in the '60s (as a teenager) I predict that 2010 and especially 2012 will see the most intense Republican infighting ever seen. Having given up the possibility of returning to power each faction will go all out to try and control the party. Steele's election as RNC Chairman will give the far right all the incentive they need to go to full battle stations and take no prisoners. It will be delicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The whole idea of "Republican unity" is laughable nowadays...
Even with all the factions of the Democratic Party, we can at least all say "We care about people."

Does the GOP care about money, Christian theocracy, or war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. This, ironically - in fact most ironically, is George W Bush's greatest legacy.

He nuked the center out of the Republican party. He couldn't have done it without Cheney.


He has reduced them to a small regional party with no leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Michigander Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not A Conservative
Barry Goldwater was a libertarian, not a conservative. In a rerun of a Brian Lamb interview with Milton Friedman today on C-SPAN2, Milton Friedman said the same thing. He was a libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He was considered a conservative by the standards of his time ("Mr. Conserative")
Also, you can't deny his influence on American conservatism, which often overlaps with Libertarianism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC