Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gov't reaction to Wall Street meltdown like ''punishment'' of Prescott Bush for hiding Nazi money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 02:56 PM
Original message
Gov't reaction to Wall Street meltdown like ''punishment'' of Prescott Bush for hiding Nazi money
Edited on Sun Mar-15-09 03:05 PM by yurbud
If an ordinary citizen gave aid and comfort to our arch-enemy in World War II, they would have at minimum expected to spend the rest of their lives in prison or more likely, ended up like the Rosenbergs, executed for helping the Soviets.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar">Prescott Bush's bank was managing assets of a Nazi financier, including a steel plant that made heavy use of concentration camp labor.
Far from being unaware of this, Bush mentioned it in correspondence and was concerned that his bank's ''interests be protected.'' The government found this activity troubling enough that they seized the banks assets under the Trading with the Enemy Act.

Bush's punishment for his involvement?

You would think he would have at least ended up like John Walker Lind, stripped naked, blind-folded, and held in solitary until the trial that put him in prison for life (or shortened his life).

Instead, the whole business was hushed up and he later won a Senate seat.

It seems that something similar is going on with Wall Street today. Can anyone doubt that Wall Street's concerted effort to get themselves deregulated, their Rube Goldberg maze of shell corporations and off-shore accounts, and intentional defrauding of ordinary investors, mortgage holders, and retirees has done more damage to our economy than Tim McVeigh, Osama bin Laden, and all the other terrorists to ever blow up anything in the US combined?

And in fact, the connection to terrorism is not just by analogy, but literal. To the degree that we face a legitimate terrorist threat, it is because business interests demand to be put ahead of human rights, democracy, and even the national security of the United States.

The foremost example of this is how we treated Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Mikhail Gorbachev hoped to transition to a European-style social democracy, but the investor class and banks wanted a Russia that was easy to plunder of their natural resources and industry. The result was the standard of living and even life expectancy in Russia DROPPED after the fall of communism, and Putin succeeds partly because he is trying to reclaim their dignity by standing up to us. Oil companies interest in stripping Russia of their oil, gas, and pipeline income further antagonizes a Russia that we now no longer have an ideological beef with. In effect, for the sake of corporate profits, we are reigniting a Cold War with an enemy with thousands of nuclear weapons.

Worse, business is a direct cause of the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the Bush administrations failure to bring a quick conclusion to the War on Terror. Those in the Islamic world do not hate us for our freedom, but because we take theirs away to ensure that our oil companies have compliant governments to deal with, from overthrowing the democratically elected secular government of Iran in the 1950s to backing the oppressive Saudi government for decades. Oddly, even though http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2008/03/foia-doc-shows-911commission-lied-about.html">the Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 found direct involvement of the Saudi government in the attacks nothing was done about it. Whether this was done because we didn't want to jeopardize business ties with Saudis or because the Saudis were doing the Bush administration a favor with the attack, neither is acceptable.

And yet, the punishment of the wealthy who endanger and loot us like this will be much like Prescott Bush's. The public will use our taxpayer dollars to clean up their mess, and they will continue to live lives of leisure and be free exercise their power as ''masters of the universe'' even though they are masters of nothing but moving our money into their pockets.

I have no problem with capitalism in theory, but in practice, we can no longer afford a financial elite that not only ignores the law, but buys our politicians and makes the indefensible legal.

Any solution to this current problem has to involve putting the fear of God or at least fear of the wrath of the American people into these spoiled sociopathic trust fund babies, the likes of which no financial elite has felt since the Russian or even French Revolution.

Anything less than that leaves America and the world at risk from more attacks by these terrorists who make 9/11 look like a toddler's temper tantrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. The lack of investigation is a red flag that something is going on
As far as I know, no one from Merrill, Lehman, AIG, Citigroup, Goldman, Countrywide or anywhere else has been charged with anything. No one but poster-children (with no visible conspirators) Madoff and Stanford.

This whole meltdown was a multi-Trillion dollar conspiracy. Surely if you shake the tree, a lot of ripe fruit will fall. Instead, everyone at all levels is being careful as can be to not call anyone to account. There are occasional statements of displeasure, but no investigation of what happened, who did it, and who should be punished. Right this second, unshredded records should be seized and emails subpoenaed. By the time any official investigation happens, it will all be way too little and too late.

What is the deal?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Cenk Uygar got it right: instead of expressing shock and dismay, Geithner et al should bust heads
It would not be acceptable to just wring your hands about terrorists or rampaging serial killers. Why is it acceptable here?


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x431401
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Law enforcement has done less about this $10T swindle than about someone smoking a single joint
Edited on Sun Mar-15-09 03:20 PM by GoesTo11
Not even exaggerating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. There are some people trying to do something about it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Rounding up the usual suspects


Merrill's bonuses are not the real story here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. True. But you said no one was doing anything.
MAybe Merrill is just the start. I know, fat chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hopefully Merrill is just the start.
Unfortunately, it seems to me that they just respond to outrageous grabs that get caught, but they're studiously avoiding any investigation into the those who caused this mess in the first place.

Even these discussions about investigating Merrill sound like a little huffing and puffing for the camera, which at best will end up with 1% of the bonus money being returned.

Bottom line, we were and are being screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. that's the best approach--tie it to long term instead of jerking stock around then dumping
they should be given shares they can't sell, or income from shares they can't touch, so they have motivation to make the company last instead of implode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Predator Class protects its water-carriers
Plunders our global labor and wealth, then slinks off laughing behind our collective backs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Beautiful
But what's in the basket???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Please. Larry Summers is very, very outraged.
He said so this morning, twice. Once to George. Once to Harry.

There now. Doesn't that make you feel much better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. oh, yes. Can I rob a bank and have him be the cop that ''catches'' me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. I have been so v ery disappointed in Obama
Summers? Geithner? Give me a fucking break. So much for 'change'.

K&R great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I second that...
.. Obama has very little time to figure out that he's picked the wrong people to run his economics policy, or he will be a one term president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. my hope is that his choice of economic team is like his effort at bipartisanship
a feint to immunize himself from criticism once he moves in a more progressive direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. PERFECT analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC