Which Risk Is The Greater?

[BlooInBloo]

Poll question: Which Risk Is The Greater?

Terrorism under Obama Presidency, or getting shot in the face hunting with Cheney?

(Inspired by: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5260479)

[MADem]

1. A city flooding, terrorists attacking our shores AND getting shot in the face by Cheney!

Oh, wait....we've seen that picture already!

[BlooInBloo]

2. The trifecta, as it were.

[Sebastian Doyle]

3. It looks like someone wants a pizza really bad

And I hope they get one.

[MADem]

4. WTF? I think you owe the OP an apology.

The question was clearly in the context of today's CHENEY INTERVIEW by John King on CNN.

If you don't understand, it's better to ask rather than accuse.

[BlooInBloo]

5. :) No worries.

[MADem]

6. Unless he's talking about the one vote for Cheney--in which case, "I" owe the poster

an apology!

Of course, that one person perhaps doesn't realize that the admins can count the votes, and associate them with members here!

[BlooInBloo]

7. Ah - didn't consider that possibility - it seems the most likely explanation. Good eye.

[MADem]

17. It does seem that was the case--and I was in error.

I was sincere in my effort to defend your bona fides, but I was off the mark.

It's so easy to misinterpret with the written word. I erred, though, so I'm the "tool" in this scenario!

[Sebastian Doyle]

10. Apology accepted

And it looks like we need two more pizzas :mad:

[BlooInBloo]

11. I know - wtf? lol!

[MADem]

16. It's up to six at this writing.

And I am sorry for accusing you like that--I hate when others do it, and I'm chastised that I leapt to conclusions without scanning the horizon properly.

[BlooInBloo]

18. It's funny because I intended this as a rhetorical question. That'll learn me.

:rofl:

[MADem]

19. What I think is most amusing

is that the admins actually can see who voted for the trollish response, and these mouth-breathers and "ironic" types apparently don't realize that.

By their enthusiasm for being disruptive, they've outed themselves. If they aren't nailed now, they'll be nailed later.

Awhile back, a bunch of people got shitcanned for responding in a highly offensive manner to a poll--I disremember what the subject was, but it was as egregious as "Did the Nazis have a point?" or "Should slavery be reestablished?"

It just shows ta go ya, there are all types out here on these goofy internets!

[BlooInBloo]

20. Ack - under 80% now!

:rofl:

[Fire_Medic_Dave]

8. One is easily avoidable.

[Demeter]

9. Aryan Nation, Red-necked White Supremacy

That jerk with the trust fund and the materials and plans for a dirty bomb, up in Maine. The Oklahoma City terrorists. Charles Manson. Serial killers.

These crazies can strike any time, any where that vigilance is relaxed and laws go unenforced.

[Sebastian Doyle]

13. Everything you say is true.

But that ain't what Darth Cheney was talking about.

[Demeter]

14. Of Course Not!

They are Cheney's homies.

[960]

12. I wouldn't go hunting with Cheney, so it would be terrorism under Obama

or any other president.

[emilyg]

15. I have a choice about going hunting with Dick.

[LiberalPersona]

21. Terrorism

by American gun nuts. Mass shootings seem to be escalating by these people.