Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama should have put Panetta at Treasury, not CIA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:29 PM
Original message
Obama should have put Panetta at Treasury, not CIA
Companion to my other thread. Leon Panetta, as a member of the House Budget Committee and later director of the OMB, helped balance the budget in the 90s.

He seems a lot more qualified for Treasury than he is for CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Panetta Is A Clintonista
Much better to get a Democrat instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. How is Panetta not a Democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Clintons Are Reagan Republicans
As are virtually all of their crew.

Look at what they did - "free" trade with China and total financial deregulation while proclaiming "the end of big government is over". Not to mention the first use of torture (the outsourced torture "extraordinary rendition" program) as official US policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Do you judge all people like that?
"Have you, or have you ever been associated with" We really need to have another McCarthy type hearing in D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Panetta Was Chief Of Staff
Edited on Sun Mar-15-09 07:11 PM by MannyGoldstein
He was charged with leading the efforts in carrying out Clinton's edicts. I don't see how he can escape culpability - we're not talking some factotum here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Clinton was a good President
I don't see the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. He Savaged The Middle Class And Introduced Torture As US Policy
Otherwise, not bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. but he didn't.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think Panetta is a civilian. An old, experienced hand, high up in the CIA,
was needed to repair the organization after the war with Rumsfeld. Panetta was greeted with cheers, applause, champagne, confetti, dancing in the aisles--when he showed up for work at Langley. Would they do that for an unknown civilian? His nomination sailed thru Congress, and by the media, without a whisper, except for DiFI who made an early peep about his "inexperience" and then immediately shut up. Not another word about that.

I think he's been CIA since his very short stint in the army (2 yrs), early on in Vietnam, and coming out a Lt. Col.

Obama's a smart guy. He wouldn't put an unknown civilian in charge of the CIA. He needed somebody to fix this gravely wounded agency immediately, and to watch his back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. True, but every agency of government has been "gravely wounded"...
...by the Bush administration, and unfortunately, there's only so many good competent people to fix the mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-15-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. He's got a gang of Wall Street traitors in there now. Geithner looks really sleezy on tv.
Like he doesn't have a straight bone in his body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC