Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Glenn Greenwald: The sanctity of AIG's contracts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 10:18 AM
Original message
Glenn Greenwald: The sanctity of AIG's contracts
Apparently, the supreme sanctity of employment contracts applies only to some types of employees but not others. Either way, the Obama administration’s claim that nothing could be done about the AIG bonuses because AIG has solid, sacred contractual commitments to pay them is, for so many reasons, absurd on its face.

As any lawyer knows, there are few things more common – or easier -- than finding legal arguments that call into question the meaning and validity of contracts. Every day, commercial courts are filled with litigations between parties to seemingly clear-cut agreements. Particularly in circumstances as extreme as these, there are a litany of arguments and legal strategies that any lawyer would immediately recognize to bestow AIG with leverage either to be able to avoid these sleazy payments or force substantial concessions.

Since the contracts are secret and we’re apparently just supposed to rely on the claims of AIG and Treasury Department lawyers, it’s impossible to identify these arguments specifically. But there are almost certainly viable claims to be asserted that the contracts were induced via fraud or that the bonus-demanding executives themselves violated their contracts. Independently, it’s inconceivable that there aren’t substantial counterclaims that AIG could assert against any executives suing to obtain these bonuses, a threat which, by itself, provides substantial leverage to compel meaningful concessions. Many of these executives were, after all, the very ones responsible for the cataclysmic losses.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/03/16/aig/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why does it seem that all the "smart" lawyers
are on the side of evil? Don't be have someone in Treasury or the AG's office with the same legal acumen as those of the AIG pig? Hell, they all seem to be about the money. How about offering them 50% of what they save the taxpayers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obligations?
Tell that to all the retirees who got screwed out of their pensions and health care -- which were contractually owed to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. The contracts for auto workers sure don't seem to mean much
Republicans are yammering for those contracts to be nullified and the workers to accept lower wages. I haven't heard the same thing about these contracts though..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. funny who sanctimonious Elites can be: when we fight their wars for oil, pay taxes without loopholes
and Carribean tax shelters

And so how, their "labor" is more precious that ours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC