Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Real AIG Scandal-By Eliot Spitzer: "This Was ALL An INSIDE JOB"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 12:56 PM
Original message
The Real AIG Scandal-By Eliot Spitzer: "This Was ALL An INSIDE JOB"
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 01:00 PM by kpete
The Real AIG Scandal
It's not the bonuses. It's that AIG's counterparties are getting paid back in full.
By Eliot Spitzer
Posted Tuesday, March 17, 2009, at 10:41 AM ET

Everybody is rushing to condemn AIG's bonuses, but this simple scandal is obscuring the real disgrace at the insurance giant: Why are AIG's counterparties getting paid back in full, to the tune of tens of billions of taxpayer dollars?

..............

It all appears, once again, to be the same insiders protecting themselves against sharing the pain and risk of their own bad adventure. The payments to AIG's counterparties are justified with an appeal to the sanctity of contract. If AIG's contracts turned out to be shaky, the theory goes, then the whole edifice of the financial system would collapse.

But wait a moment, aren't we in the midst of reopening contracts all over the place to share the burden of this crisis? From raising taxes—income taxes to sales taxes—to properly reopening labor contracts, we are all being asked to pitch in and carry our share of the burden. Workers around the country are being asked to take pay cuts and accept shorter work weeks so that colleagues won't be laid off. Why can't Wall Street royalty shoulder some of the burden? Why did Goldman have to get back 100 cents on the dollar? Didn't we already give Goldman a $25 billion capital infusion, and aren't they sitting on more than $100 billion in cash? Haven't we been told recently that they are beginning to come back to fiscal stability? If that is so, couldn't they have accepted a discount, and couldn't they have agreed to certain conditions before the AIG dollars—that is, our dollars—flowed?

The appearance that this was all an inside job is overwhelming. AIG was nothing more than a conduit for huge capital flows to the same old suspects, with no reason or explanation.

more at (xlnt ?s too):
http://www.slate.com/id/2213942/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is the motherlode. Those who KNOW have to tell us what;s going on. Thanks, kpete!
THis is why they HAD to get rid of Spitzer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
78. A big K&R. Spitzer was on AIG's back when the feds went after him.
I believe that Mukasey and the DOJ lied in public about Spitzer in order to protect AIG, because they knew that the company would be used as a conduit to funnel tax payer money back to groups like trhe Bush family's own Carlyle which had taken huge losses in the mortgage market.

And I believe that companies like AIG are giving out huge bonuses so that their employees can bribe Congress into ignoring the crimes of Wall Street and the bankers. The bailout was the biggest f'ing political slush fund ever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
93. exactemundo nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. A boobytrap in other words.
They drafted contracts that would mandate AIG to pay them for their fuck-ups and if they didn't pay, they'd sue AIG for breach of contract.

Yeah, sounds like a set-up to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RJ Connors Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
60. I gathered from another article that,
these contracts were negotiated in early 2008. That right there makes me very suspicious and says that we still need to keep digging into this mess and find out what's, what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am missing Eliot Spitzer already....
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I have missed him since the very day he was shot down.
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 01:11 PM by truedelphi
yes yes yes it was all his own doing. But I hated seeing the only big shot that I know who ever successfully hassled Monsanto.

And I have heard ever since his downfall that he was taken out because of what he knew about Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. he gave them the rope..
to hang him with, but if it weren't for that..they'd find something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. Spitzer's personal issues were the public reason for his downfall
But the OP and stuff like it is the reason he was targeted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. and HE had to have known that was so...
He needed to stay clean, and not give them anything to use against him...he failed the test...wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
57. ...at least he managed to stay alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #57
79. Yes, he did,
and he's able to think and write. Too bad for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. I still do not know what is the big deal if he had a hooker....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Vitter got caught and he's still in office.
Limbaugh got caught and he's still on the radio. See, laws and morals don't apply to repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #48
90. Joe Scarborough and dead assisstant
Hey,what about the young, female aide to Morning Joe found dead in his office while he was in Congress a few years back?

Guess a Democrat's live hooker trumps a Republican's dead aide?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #43
56. the outrage is only justified if it is REPUBLICAN outrage...
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 05:54 PM by windbreeze
I mean, they haven't had any of their own earth shaking scandals in the previous 8 years, have they??...how many of them did these sorts of foibles actually take down???next to none??...however...Spitzer KNEW he was playing in the big leagues, and knowing he was going after the big boys...he should have kept himself above this sort of thing...just for THAT reason alone...they were gunning for him right out of the gate.... personally, I still don't think he should have had to resign...wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #56
94. Hooker was a set-up?

Please explain $5500 an hour to me · Philadelphia Daily News ^ | March 11,2008 | Elmer Smith ...
www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1984159/posts - 50k - Cached - Similar pages

Spitzer's Pimp Gets 6 Months - Cecil Suwal - Zimbio Cecil "Katie" Suwal (inset) ran Emporer's Club VIP with Mark Brener. Former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer (right) paid the service for high-dollar ...
www.zimbio.com/Cecil+Suwal/articles/17/Spitzer+s+Pimp+Gets+6+Months - 57k - Cached - Similar pages

KABOBfest: Spitzer's Pimp an Israeli Citizen In case my delicious metaphor needed a little sprinkles on top, Haaretz reported that the pimp who hooked up New York Governor Eliot Spitzer is an Israeli ...
www.kabobfest.com/2008/03/spitzers-pimp-israeli-citizen.html - 153k - Cached - Similar pages

SPITZER'S PIMP PLEADS GUITY - New York Post Jun 13, 2008 ... The operator of a multimillion-dollar hooker ring that brought down ex-Gov. Eliot Spitzer pleaded guilty to money laundering and ...
www.nypost.com/seven/06132008/news/regionalnews/spitzs_pimp_is_guilty_115321.htm - 68k - Cached - Similar pages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #43
66. Screwer or screwee
The screwin' he got ain't nothin' like the screwing we're gettin'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #43
120. Sex....seems to be the only thing that outrages 'murkins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. we are slowly inching closer to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. same mo as well...aig bonuses and the 'gun to your head' bailout in sept..fast...lets round up these
"old suspects"..or make their money worthless somehow...refuse to give them our homes...wow..just wow..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
102. Shoot them
Shoot them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Spitzer certainly puts forward excellent questions that should be...
asked AND answered, imo.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Last Stand Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
58. Elliot knows the answers to these questions. That's why they outed him.
Not a coincidence. Dumbass left himself open, though, and took himself out of the mix to get to the bottom of this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Now we know why Spitzer had to be destroyed
while Diaper Dave Vitter and Toe-Tappin' Larry Craig skated.

A hint of a scandal and the corporate media declared Spitzer's career over and done. He was too close to the truth about the Great American Bank Robbery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
62. I wouldn't doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Everything's a conspiracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. With criminal enterprises it always is. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. And that's what's so perplexing about those who honestly believe conspiracies are non-existent
It isn't about shadowy X Files shenanigans, it's simply the way big business conducts business, and has to use a cover story to maintain the 'democracy' ruse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
47. And that is business as usual. Damage control is done by big business's media
army, who marginalize people who dare to speak the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #47
112. Unfortunately it seems to work that way within most social/belief structures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. RICO Enforcement
When the all thugs, thieves and weasels of Wall Street conspire it's called cooperative endeavors.

I call it collusion.

I also think Federal racketeering charges are in order-PRONTO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
74. With ever crime, the Police want to know who else is involved! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. We need Eliot Spitzer. Racketeering or other criminal convictions may get $ flowing back to us.nt
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 01:14 PM by terisan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. Could this be a rope-a-dope?
In other words, will the house of cards come crashing down in terms of indictments being issued for fraud?

NAAAAH, the government is in on it because the politicians got their big money donations from these crooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. k & r
Thank you for this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. It seems so Enron-ish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. Foreclosure Phil
Enronish-it ought to!

The person responsible for deregulation of much of the subprime mortgage market,and speculation in general was Phil Gramm,from Texas-author of the {Gramm -Leach-Bliely Act] about 15 years ago,perhaps more.

His wife was on the board of Enron.

When Gramm quit politics,he became a lobbyist for UBS-the Swiss bank who is recipient of much TARP money.

You might remember Gramm as McCain's economic advisor who called America a nation of whiners and that the recession was merely mental!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. uhhhhh...errrrrr....no foreign banks received TARP money...
....not even UBS, though UBS did receive a Swiss government bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. I think the poster means indirectly.
The Swiss banks got the money in the form of secret accounts from the bankers who got it from TARP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. That doesn't make much sense...
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 05:08 PM by Lucky Luciano
Certainly Goldman or whoever did not give their TARP money to the Swiss...if you mean bonuses of execs going to their personal Swiss bank accts, well....even if some did, it was a miniscule amount. Most bankers are not fat cats - most are just upper middle class bordering on rich - definitely not secret Swiss bank account worthy people. Not sure if AIG was a counterparty for UBS, but if they were, then UBS may have gotten money from the Fed indirectly this way (by having AIG post collateral on their CDS contracts), though that is not TARP money either - AIG is its own animal - one big nast mofo. I don't think I remember seeing UBS as one of the counterparties though. I see this list actually (from a FrenchieCat post):


* Goldman Sachs
* Deutsche Bank
* Merrill Lynch
* Société Générale
* Calyon
* Barclays
* Rabobank
* Danske
* HSBC
* Royal Bank of Scotland
* Banco Santander
* Morgan Stanley
* Wachovia
* Bank of America
* Lloyds Banking Group
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Ugh, I missed a step.
TARP gives to banks, banks give bonuses to execs, execs open secret Swiss accounts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. mehh...I covered that part...not significant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #50
63. Payouts to UBS via AIG
News results for UBS and AIG bonuses Obama's Challenge: Containing the AIG Bonus Outrage - Mar 16, 2009
Obama's focus at the White House was on bonuses for AIG's 370-person financial ... One example is UBS, the Union Bank of Switzerland, which got $5 billion. ...TIME - 8444 related articles »

Cuomo Blasts Big AIG Payouts - WSJ.com Mar 17, 2009 ... Cuomo said AIG paid bonuses of $1 million or more to 73 ... payouts through AIG to UBS, now caught up in a tax-shelter dispute with the IRS. ...
online.wsj.com/article/SB123730459869257121.html - 7 hours ago - Similar pages

United States Senator Olympia J. Snowe :: Press Room Snowe Expresses Outrage over AIG Bonuses and UBS Tax Crimes ... Expressing disbelief, Senator Snowe also cited the interwoven relationship of UBS and AIG. ...
snowe.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=15a6230a-802a-23ad... - 4 hours ago - Similar pages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #63
71. I saw Senator Olympia J. Snowe on tv today say she and Senator Wyden had it written in Stimulus
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 07:39 PM by flyarm
that no bonus's wuold be paid , that is why she went along with the Stimulus.she said it was the behind the doors negotiating that took it out without telling anyone involved in agreeing to the stimulus..she was pissed!!!!!!!!..She put it right on the doorstep of dems and the stimulus bill!

This bonus stuff is a deflection..165 million is piss ants to what is going to foreign banks..and the insiders! Payoffs are going on and it is on both sides of the damn isle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #71
80. That's a real shame.
How likely is she to do favors for dems in the future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #80
117. how likely?? she shouldn't..none of them should sign off on anything
Edited on Wed Mar-18-09 10:56 AM by flyarm
until they have read each and every freaking word..that is their job..

so what was the last bill filled with ..ohhhh..a mere..9,000 earmarks..earmarks we can ill afford..and Obama said he would go line by line through earmarks...before he signed any bill..well..he didn't..and most in congress never read the damn bill..this is like groundhog day..over and over again.......

and it is your money they are all pissing away..but worse..it is China's money your kids and grandkids will be paying back one day...or be owned by China..a <still> communist country.

but ...LOOOOKKKKK the other way>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noooooooooo<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<that way
better yet>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>......don't dare bring it up..or you will be called all sorts of names around here!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #117
128. As to last bill, which was required
because none of them could get their acts together last session, any reasonable person recognizes that there was no choice but to sign it or begin his term with an entire government shut down. PS, earmarks are often necessary, stimulating, and affordable; they're just 'hidden' as such.

We're talking here about the stimulus, right?, which wyden and snowe and and all had read, and in an interesting turn of events (see other threads here) apparently WH messed with bonus stuff. Last I read, that was yet to be understood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
89. Larry Summers and California Energy "crisis" / Enron
During the California energy crisis of 2000, then-Treasury Secretary Larry Summers teamed with Alan Greenspan and Enron executive Kenneth Lay to lecture California Governor Gray Davis on the causes of the crisis, explaining that the problem was excessive government regulation.<8> Under the advice of Kenneth Lay, Summers urged Davis to relax California's environmental standards in order to reassure the markets. <9>


President of Harvard
He left the Treasury Department in 2001 when George W. Bush became President and returned to Harvard as its 27th President, serving from July 2001 until June 2006. He was Harvard's first Jewish president, and received praise from Harvard's Jewish community for his support. <10>

A number of his decisions at Harvard attracted public controversy.~~~~~~~~Wikipedia

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #89
114. Tim Geithner worked for 3 years at Kissingers firm..and then the CFR.........
Tim Geithner worked for 3 years at Kissingers firm..and then the CFR.........

look into the back ground of Geithners dad , Peter Geithner and his ties to Obama's mom and step dad!!

Google is your friend!!


See Obama sent Kissinger To Russia shortly after becoming president to represent the Obama administration in Russia..
Kissinger who held positions with Nixon, Ford and Reagan !!!!!!!!!!!!

this kissinger:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GThfWVCfjVo&eurl=http ://...

"There is a need for a new world order," Kissinger told PBS interviewer Charlie Rose last year, "I think that at the end of this administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next, we might actually witness the creation of a new order – because people looking in the abyss, even in the Islamic world, have to conclude that at some point, ordered expectations must return under a different system."


This is the Kissinger Obama sent to Russia........representing his administration..

http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/82may/hershwh2.htm

Kissinger and Nixon in the White House
by Seymour M. Hersh


http://www.commondreams.org/views02/0611-03.htm


and that is just for starters!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. The next company that comes with it's hand out needs to go immediately
into receivership. Just start dissolving them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
21. dupe
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 01:23 PM by pleah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Here's more from TIME: Obama's AIG Outrage: All Talk, No Action

Obama's AIG Outrage: All Talk, No Action
By Michael Scherer / Washington Tuesday, Mar. 17, 2009

In the middle of decrying the misdeeds of the financial firm AIG, President Obama cracked a joke. "Excuse me," he said Monday, after coughing into the microphone. "I am choked up with anger here." There were laughs all around the gilded East Room of the White House, because he didn't sound angry at all.

The laughter, of course, did not fit the occasion, the latest in a seemingly endless stream of public events at which Washington's political leaders work themselves into high dudgeon over the sins of financial wizards who, we are told over and over again, have messed up the world for everyone else. But then, you can only act outraged about the same thing so many times before it all starts to sound stale. These spectacles, the public rhetorical floggings, have become teleplays, as predictable as a daytime soap opera, as comforting as a wet rock. (See pictures of the top 10 scared traders.)

As the event wore on, even Obama did not seem that into it, a surprising misfire for a politician who has long excelled at always striking the right tone at public appearances. He was almost grinning as he described the "recklessness and greed" of the traders in AIG's financial products division, a reckless band of wealthy incompetents who made bets they could not pay for, leaving the American taxpayer on the hook for as much as $173 billion in emergency funds -- an enormous sum that works out to about $600 for every man, woman and child in America. "How do they justify this outrage?" Obama asked rhetorically, with only the slightest tinge of outrage in his own voice. (Read "Obama's Challenge: Containing the AIG Bonus Outrage.")

Then he announced that he had instructed his Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, to seek "every single legal avenue available to block" $165 million in bonuses that were awarded last week to the very same traders at AIG's Financial Products division who made the bad bets in the first place. This was a politically necessary thing for Obama to say, even if it lacked a punch.

Obama had promised weeks ago to stop the excessive bonuses on Wall Street, at a time when the existence of the coming AIG bonuses had already been disclosed by the excellent reporting of Bloomberg News. Obama's staff had vowed more recently that the further infusion of taxpayer money into AIG, which the federal government now controls 80% of, was appropriate and necessary. And now he was faced with the fact that his new executive compensation policy, which only applied to a narrow subset of executives at a few institutions, had been powerless to stop the worst violators at AIG from getting their undeserved payday. (See the worst business deals of 2008.)

On ABC's The View, Whoopi Goldberg spoke for the rest of the nation when she looked into the camera and said, as if to AIG executives, "You can't bend us over!"

But the sad truth is they can. And they probably will. And President Obama, despite his popularity and moral indignation, has few tools to stop them.

-snip-

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1885668,00.html

Enough with the extortion. Let the bitch FAIL. No more taxpayer dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. Great insights by Spitzer
I could care less about his personal life - that's why it's called a personal life. Glad to see slate.com publishing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. K&R ...."It's not the bonuses...." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
27. As I have been saying AIG was always a 'passthrough' for govt taxpayer $$ ....
... to many of the entities which caused this economic crisis, and the same ones who already took a huge portion of taxpayer money in their own names.

The AIG explanations make no sense at all unless you consider that AIG is alive just to funnel taxpayer money to other entities which wish to remain anonymous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Exactly!

The largest transfer of wealth in history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. AIG ,CIA, and BCCI
levey has done some extraordinary pieces here at DU on the intersections of these firms-going back to the last economic meltdown when GHW Bush was president.

S&L scandals,Silverado,BCCI, Saudi Safari Club,Keating Five-all in the 80's.

This is the second looting of the American treasury while a Bush was President... many of same banks and same cast of characters.

BTW, the NYT article today by Andrew Sorkin defending the necessity of paying AIG bailouts -does anybody know if he's by chance related to Ira Sorkin,Madoff's attorney and BFF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suegeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #35
69. Ira Sorkins' sons
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 07:44 PM by suegeo
The sons of Ira Sorkin might present a conflict of interest for their Madoff-defending daddy. This article doesn't give the sons' names, as far as I can tell. You'd think they'd be given first names in some news article somewhere.

http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/03/10/2009-03-10_sons_of_ira_sorkin_lawyer_of_accused_pon.html

SNIP The sons of Bernard Madoff's lawyer could be among those lining up for a payout from the accused Ponzi swindler, Manhattan federal prosecutors said Tuesday.

Attorney Ira Sorkin's two sons have $900,000 invested with Madoff in a trust account set up by their grandfather.
*****ON EDIT******
ANDREW NOT RELATED TO IRA
Pilar Jenny Queen, the daughter of Bobbi Queen of New York, was married last evening to Andrew Ross Sorkin, the son of Joan Ross Sorkin and Laurence T. Sorkin of Scarsdale, N.Y.

The bridegroom, 30, is the chief mergers and acquisitions reporter for The New York Times and is the editor of DealBook, an online financial news report on the Web site of The New York Times. He graduated from Cornell.

Linky:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/10/fashion/weddings/10Queen.html

ON EDIT AGAIN
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ira_Lee_Sorkin
According to the wiki,
Sorkin defended that fascist Murdoch early on. Eh, I guess even fascists deserve their day in court.
SNIP One of his first private clients was Rupert Murdoch in the law firm of Howard Squadron, Theodore Ellenoff and Stanley Plesant. When the firm was sold, he joined Dickstein Shapiro.

ON EDIT
Ira Sorkins' sons are Roger and Peter. They got 900,000 from grandma's IRA, invested with Madoff, pulled out in 2007 when she died.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aKmjrSn_kQI8&refer=home

SNIP Sorkin said he didn’t get the money, declining further comment on who did. The Wall Street Journal reported that the account was divided between his sons, Roger and Peter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #69
85. Thank You!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
42. Bet your ass that the REAL crooks have 3-4 layers of indirection....
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 04:22 PM by Junkdrawer
AIG pays Goldman Sachs pays Citi pays XYZ Hedge Fund pays ABC Trust pays Crook...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
95. AIG Reinsurance scam
AIG’s Past Could Return to Haunt
Inter Press Service (IPS) Dec 19, 2008

American International Group (AIG) operated a captive insurance scam that involved fraudulent use of offshore tax havens. Currently, the U.S. government has invested over $40 billion in AIG, with the U.S. getting nearly 80 percent of its stock.

This puts the U.S. in a unique position to investigate the internal operations of a giant corporation with a reputation for using the offshore system for tax evasion.

U.S. authorities could begin their investigations with a look into a very curious practice that was revealed 15 years ago in a case that was never exposed by the mainstream press and which insurance insiders say is endemic.

AIG would keep a portion of a client’s inflated insurance premium and send the rest to the client’s offshore reinsurance company. AIG would earn a higher commission. The client would write off the entire amount as a business expense and enjoy the extra cash offshore, tax free.

This story tells how notorious fraudster Victor Posner made an AIG deal to stash reinsurance profits in Bermuda.

Read more at Komisar Scoop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jambalaya Donating Member (359 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #95
96. Link to Komisar Scoop
The Komisar Scoop Lucy Komisar writes about the criminal offshore bank BCCI and the way it connected the Bushes, the Saudis, Saddam and Osama bin Laden ...
thekomisarscoop.com/ - 402k - Cached - Similar pages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
28. Ding ding
We have a winner.
KO and Rachel - get Eliot Spitzer on your programs NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Hyde Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
29. Why do we keep "bailing out" these criminals? Is this change we can believe in?
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 02:51 PM by Mr. Hyde
This is getting infuriating.
edit typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
54. There will be a tipping point
The populist anger coming at this from all sides is going to reach a point where it will simply explode.

The question is going to be is if its too late to effectively save our nation.

Don't get me wrong, I love Obama and I think he's been a very good President so far and he's tasked with a major bag of fuck-up to attempt to clean up. However, it remains to be seen how much he is going to be allowed to change or reverse course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #54
82. I even heard people talking about it on the Los Angeles Metro
line today -- people who did not look like they generally talk about economic or political news. I was amazed. And, by the way, the Metro line (in non-rush-hours) is not like the subways in New York, Chicago, San Francisco or other big cities. Very few middle class people in the non-rush-hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #54
98. My next door neighbor never talks to me about politics
But this thing of more and more Main Street monies going to BailOut the Wall Street Big BOys,. again and again, has him pissed.

He said sadly, "Well I had hope in Obama and the change he promised. Why does Obama have the same people that caused the mess to be there in his Administration?""

I suspect he voted Democratic for the first time in a long while (if he ever even vttoed for the Dems before.) And he is disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #98
101. It's a common theme - and it's a shame too
Again, Obama has a lot going for him and there's no other person that I'd rather have leading our nation at this particular time.

However, some of the decisions on the financial & economic side have been less than stellar. When you look across the entire scope of the administration its the one area that just doesn't fit the theme of change and sensible leadership. Geithner was one of the ones that contributed to this mess and now he's in charge of cleaning it up - and he's doing the same things as before to "fix" the problem.

I really have some misgivings about Obama in this area. It's almost as if he was told to keep certain things in place. Like he didn't have a choice in the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #101
108. Or like he has a choice-we all do
but he actually thinks all morality is about making sure gays can not get married, and that theft and fraud is not at all wrong, just clever, and ought to be rewarded.
Rip off billions, get a reward check. Steal, get taxpayer money as a bonus. Torture, start illegal wars, well, that's cool.
Just don't love the 'wrong person'. That we must 'defend against' with talk of God. I guess OBama's God supports theft and fraud, but is all hung up about sex. I guess Obama has the same God as the Republicans.
I'm too mad to say anything more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #108
126. Don't get me started on the approach/justification to inequality for
Some Americans. You'd think we were back in the fourteen hundreds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #101
125. I know - it really doesn't add up. Here is Pres. Obama coming out and
Edited on Wed Mar-18-09 01:37 PM by truedelphi
Saying that we will close Gitmo, that we will pull the troops out of Iraq, that we will do needle exchange rather than hype up the drug wars, and then his appointees cannot make a single intelligent decision about the economy? (Well the stim bill might have made sense, but the Wall Street Bailouts do not - and they are the most expensive part of the program, especially given the 2.1 Trillion dollar buyout of "toxic assets.")

I have no idea what is going on with this. It just doesn't add up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. Give Spitzer a boost by digging the Slate article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
31. Spitzer gets his moment- he had to go-the man who knew too much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
34. too bad he managed to undo his reputation of right/wrong
he probably could have been a huge star/hero to many Americans - now he's just a footnote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
38. Big K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flagrante Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. Greg Palast had the Spitzer story a long time ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #39
100. my question to Spitzer is why didn't he reference AIG & the doomed financial market in his downfall
and say that he would be proven right (unless he did and I didn't read or hear about it?) when everything collapsed because he was going after them? That is what upsets me if this man was taken down for sex when he was going after the bad guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marias23 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
40. The bonuses in spite of their obvious unfairness are a distraction
The bonuses in spite of their obvious unfairness are a distraction. We have multi-trillion dollar problem that must be acted on. By focusing in the bonuses the left and the media are giving conservatives fuel to undermine the stimulus. Let it go. (at least for now).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #40
115. absolutely!!!!!!!! You have it right MARIAS23!!
Edited on Wed Mar-18-09 10:48 AM by flyarm
there is a damn big difference between millions and billions..

This was millions..for the bonus's...

someone in this admins does not want you to look further than the millions ..to the billions of your tax dollars that just went to foreign entities!..oh and those BILLIONS are borrowed billions with interest rates that are soon to follow!!

the millions are chicken feed to what is really being spent and going world wide of your $$$$$$$$$$$$$$

the bonus's are a defelction..from the billions going to foreign banks that gambled ..yes gambled with AIG..how many 165 million does it take to make a billion?? and yet billions of our tax dollars are going to foreign banks..where is the true outrage of that????????

want to see what a billion and a trillion looks like??????

http://www.pagetutor.com/trillion/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vssmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
44. It appears that Henry Paulson wanted his former employer,
Goldman Sachs, to get their money from AIG. Was he still owning shares when he made this deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #44
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #44
83. Can we hang Paulson now?
I'd donate for the rope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
46. the thousands of these fucked politicians and bankers in on this scam is incredible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
49. And Europe is yelling "protectionism".. We bail out their banks and when
we want to spend our on tax monies on ourselves they scream protectionism.. This is an outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. It is rather annoying.
We made sure their counterparty risk was mitigated - the least they could do is play nice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #49
67. What nations in Europe have done that? Did you mean Mexico? Links please
Mexico just imposed some "protectionist" tariffs in response to Congress prohibiting Mexican trucks from delivering and picking up freight in the United States which is a clear violation of the NAFTA agreement. Mexico is not a European nation.

I don't support NAFTA, but, it looks like the United States just fired the first shot in a self-defeating "protectionist" war with Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
55. K&R n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
59. We are told we owe 80% of AIG
LOL! AIG is connected to Kroll securities and the CIA. It's all a joke. Kroll was responsible for the security of the WTC. And how do we the people own part of the CIA? We don't. I think this is more like the Ponzi scheme that Madoff pulled. This house of cards might just come tumbling down. But who knows if we will ever get to the bottom of this. I think the hike in oil prices were another scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
61. Sanctity of the Contract = Zero Tolerance.
Reminds me of decades ago, being hounded, yes hounded by GMAC they wanted me to make on behalf of my boyfriends contract a payment with them. Hell no. They even hounded me at work. The nerve. So I understand the sanctity of the contract is Zero Tolerance that AIG is using the sanctity of the contract/zero tolerance to get them bailed out with taxpayer $'s. No thank you. Parent corporations with cjildren should in cases like this have their children taken away. AKA breaking up the parent corporation into itty bitty pieces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaulRevere08 Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
65. OMG!! Why does this remind me of the Californina "energy crisis"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
68. K. Ms pete does it again! k*r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
70. "A-I-G was an in-side jo-ob".
Let's see who gets this. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
72. Of course it was an inside job...
...It was the thieves stealing the china and silverware out the door.
Once the deregulation started, back in the days of Reagan, this was bound to happen.
Spitzer was ratted out, because they had to ruin him some way. His personal life should be held private.
I just hope that someone, maybe Andrew Cuomo stays in touch with Spitzer, and nails their asses in jail, where they all belong, and gets back the money that belongs to WE THE PEOPLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
73. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
75. Read this as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
76. K&R'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
77. They'll probably be back to actually kill Spitzer now . . .!!!!
But -- thank you Elliot Spitzer for telling us what's going on!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #77
81. Yeh, you can bet he's extremely depressed and despondent. A man ready to take his
own life. Probably in a garden shed behind his mom's house, ya know.

Bless him while he's alive, kicking, and doin' the lord's work!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
84. odd how Spitzer's piece isn't getting much play. too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
86. the 'bonus outrage' is a distraction, with the msm fanning the flames...
and LOTS of people seem to be falling for it- even/especially around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
87. Same old suspects_Chris Dodd on Mary L. Schapiro
Analysis and discussion with the Chairman of Banking Committee Chris Dodd.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgymGJ4uNxA

6:30 7:07

Schapiro's corrupt as Markopolos pointed out.

01:02:11 MARKOPOLOS

01:02:39 REP.SHERMAN

01:05:01 REP.CASTLE

01:05:36 MARKOPOLOS

http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/index.php?main_page=product_video_info&products_id=283836-1


Barack Obama vs. Chris Dodd at the AFL-CIO Debate

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mn6ZneR2ias

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vic Meyers Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
88. What would make me feel better about it all.
I would love nothing more that to see President Obama to go on prime time and announce to the nation that, although we cannot legally prevent AIG from issuing the bonuses, we can have every last bonus-receiving executive audited by the IRS and ensure that those who are screwing the taxpayers are paying their taxes while they do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
91. 'Failure to answer these questions will feed the populist rage that is metastasizing very quickly.'
Eliot Spitzer is on to these criminals.


.....

The appearance that this was all an inside job is overwhelming. AIG was nothing more than a conduit for huge capital flows to the same old suspects, with no reason or explanation.

So here are several questions that should be answered, in public, under oath, to clear the air:


What was the precise conversation among Bernanke, Geithner, Paulson, and Blankfein that preceded the initial $80 billion grant?

Was it already known who the counterparties were and what the exposure was for each of the counterparties?

What did Goldman, and all the other counterparties, know about AIG's financial condition at the time they executed the swaps or other contracts? Had they done adequate due diligence to see whether they were buying real protection? And why shouldn't they bear a percentage of the risk of failure of their own counterparty?

What is the deeper relationship between Goldman and AIG? Didn't they almost merge a few years ago but did not because Goldman couldn't get its arms around the black box that is AIG? If that is true, why should Goldman get bailed out? After all, they should have known as well as anybody that a big part of AIG's business model was not to pay on insurance it had issued.

Why weren't the counterparties immediately and fully disclosed?


Failure to answer these questions will feed the populist rage that is metastasizing very quickly. And it will raise basic questions about the competence of those who are supposedly guiding this economic policy.




IMHO, Geithner and Summers should be fired. These two are a black mark on the Obama Administration.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #91
110. Great questions.
My belief is that Goldman Sachs are the real daylight robbers. There are plenty of other banks benefitting but they seem to be the most deeply entrenched and the media seems to be staying clear of implicating them in it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinger2 Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
92. Hello, Did you ever think the USA has had a Coup
Hello, Did you ever think the USA has had a Coup and we are all pawns in the game of draining every dime out of Americans, as the laugh all the way to the Cayman Islands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
97. Geithner has been exposed and the Obama administration better do something about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
99. How many of us here on DU were screaming this truth last fall?
:argh:

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #99
106. Swear to God! A whole lot of people could smell this sh*t from a mile away.
But too many idiots felt if ou "leaders" were in favor of this, it HAD to be kosher.

We are ALL getting gamed and screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #106
124. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
103. The-poweres-that-be knew what they were doing when they
got rid of Eliot Spitzer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
104. 116th recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
105. The only mistake in the article: There WAS in fact a "reason" and "explanation."
Drowning the government in a bathtub. This was a way to make it happen, and get stinking filthy rich in the process so that you have enough money to ride out the worldwide calamity you created.

Ask Grover and the neocons. They'll explain the theory to you.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
107. Oh, we know Spitzer
the only time I watched "Kramer's Real Money" (or whatever) Spitzer was a guest caller.
We know it was an inside job.
If they hadn't taken Spitz down, would he still have written this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
109. Interesting article from 2004 involving AIG...
They have been cooking the books for years so that they can hide the shell game they have been playing.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=5279370&mesg_id=5279370
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
111. Figures. This is why I had no illusions that a Dem majority would change much
So many of them are still on board with this. ALL of the Repukes are like this, but many of the Dems are too. What a shame people don't rise up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
113. WSJ: Citi's Chief Economist Leaves for Treasury Post
WSJ: Citi's Chief Economist Leaves for Treasury Post


Source: The Wall Street Journal

Citigroup Inc.'s chief economist is leaving the New York company for a job at the U.S. Treasury Department, according to an internal Citigroup memo.

Lewis Alexander, who has been at Citigroup since 1999 and before that worked at the Federal Reserve, will head to Treasury "to work on domestic financial issues," said the Citigroup memo, which was sent Tuesday.


According to a government official, Mr. Alexander will be a counselor to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. Mr. Alexander and a Treasury spokesman weren't immediately available to comment Tuesday. A Citigroup spokesman declined to elaborate on the company's memo.
(...)
Mr. Alexander's role as Citigroup's chief economist didn't entail significant management responsibilities. But his optimistic economic forecasts colored executives' views that the U.S. was unlikely to face a prolonged slump.

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123732747181462245.html

anyone getting that tingle down their leg yet???????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #113
119. yep.
revolving doors, private industry to federal government, and all the while taking care of their own while screwing the rest. it really stinks to high heaven, and i am not hopeful regarding an equitable outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antimatter98 Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
116. AIG scam is tip of the iceberg. Obama's doing nothing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #116
118. It seems it is ALL a scam. We're just paying for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #118
122. Oh and our kids and our kids kids will be paying for it!! This will be generational!!
won't they just love us!!

eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
121. Marking for later read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sixmile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
123. Kicked to keep Cuomo safe and out of trouble
You never know where or when your past will catch up to you. Right, Mr. Spitzer?
Cuomo is up against some powerful, shady criminal networks. I hope he keeps himself clean and stays out of canoes and small planes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #123
127. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
129. ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
130. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC