Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Re: AIG: "Numerous Individuals Who Received Large 'Retention' Bonuses Are No Longer At The Firm"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:14 PM
Original message
Re: AIG: "Numerous Individuals Who Received Large 'Retention' Bonuses Are No Longer At The Firm"
Cuomo Reveals AIG Details: 73 Employees Got Multi-Million-Dollar Bonuses
March 17, 2009 01:22 PM

<snip>

AIG's assertion that it had no choice but to make multi-million dollar bonus payments was undercut this afternoon by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, who revealed new details about the now-infamous pay packages.

Cuomo reveals that 73 individuals received bonuses of $1 million or more, with one recipient getting a bonus of more than $6.4 million.

In particular, Cuomo takes aim at AIG's rationale for distributing more than $160 million in retention payments to members of its Financial Products subsidiary, "the unit of AIG that was principally responsible for the firm's meltdown," according to a letter sent by Cuomo to Barney Frank, chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services.

Though AIG has stressed that payments were essential to retain individuals at Financial Products vital to unwinding the subsidiary business, Cuomo notes that "numerous individuals who received large 'retention' bonuses are no longer at the firm."

Cuomo's office also learned more details about the bonuses:

• The top recipient received more than $6.4 million;
• The top seven bonus recipients received more than $4 million each;
• The top ten bonus recipients received a combined $42 million;
• 22 individuals received bonuses of $2 million or more, and combined they
received more than $72 million;
• 73 individuals received bonuses of $1 million or more; and
• Eleven of the individuals who received "retention" bonuses of $1 million
or more are no longer working at AIG, including one who received $4.6
million;

Again, these payments were all made to individuals in the subsidiary whose performance
led to crushing losses and the near failure of AIG. Thus, last week, AIG made more than 73
millionaires in the unit which lost so much money that it brought the firm to its knees, forcing taxpayer bailout. Something is deeply wrong with this outcome. I hope the Committee will
address it head on.

We have also now obtained the contracts under which AIG decided to make these
payments. The contracts shockingly contain a provision that required most individuals' bonuses to be 100% of their 2007 bonuses. Thus, in the Spring of last year, AIG chose to lock in bonuses for 2008 at 2007 levels despite obvious signs that 2008 performance would be disastrous in comparison to the year before. My Office has thus begun to closely examine the circumstances under which the plan was created.


<snip>

Link (with letter included): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/17/cuomo-reveals-details-of_n_175865.html

:banghead:

:wtf:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. DAMN!!! Should've given them more money!
More money = more retention! Even I knew that! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL !!!
Yeah... How do you expect us to keep the best and brightest???

Oh... um... nevermind.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. THOSE ENGLISHMEN SURE ARE TRICKY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Geithner and Obama do need to get a handle on this nonsense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They Need To Nationalize Somebody...
just to put the fear of god in the rest of 'em.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. JEEZUS! Geithner IS the nonsense. (and implying the President may be
wrong is not allowed)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. I wonder what certain politicians knew in Spring '08 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Geithner and Summers need to be fired
This is a political blow to Obama and the Rubinites but could be a political winner for Cuomo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder if the AIG Non-Retention Retention Bonuses was in fact hush money
related to Madoff's Operation?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5273942

"MYTHS ABOUT MADOFF’S “PONZI SCHEME” – Bernie’s Game Wasn’t What They Tell You"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kick !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Gives new meaning to the song "Take the Money and Run"
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 08:25 PM by OhioChick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC