Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now would be a great time to raise the top rate income tax

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:24 PM
Original message
Now would be a great time to raise the top rate income tax
You know, with all that outrage about bonuses for failed Wall Street millionaires and stuff.

Oh make them pay full fica tax too, no more of this limit BS.

When the right complains, just counter in 2 words: AIG Bonuses!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. How much should it be raised? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. In 'honor' of Saint Ronald (of Reagan) ... 50%, of course.
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. At what level of income? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. $250K of earned income, $100K of unearned income.
I'm not inclined to tax labor more highly than gains/dividends as is the case now. The reverse is warranted, except at the lowest levels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I thought Obama already had numbers set for that ?
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 05:30 PM by ColbertWatcher


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. now, 39%, long term, 50% or higher
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 05:31 PM by LSK
If you are going to protest this, I give you history:
Applicable
Year Income
brackets First
bracket Top
bracket Source
1913-1915 - 1% 7% IRS
1916 - 2% 15% IRS
1917 - 2% 67% IRS
1918 - 6% 73% IRS
1919-1920 - 4% 73% IRS
1921 - 4% 73% IRS
1922 - 4% 56% IRS
1923 - 3% 56% IRS
1924 - 1.5% 46% IRS
1925-1928 - 1.5% 25% IRS
1929 - 0.375% 24% IRS
1930-1931 - 1.125% 25% IRS
1932-1933 - 4% 63% IRS
1934-1935 - 4% 63% IRS
1936-1939 - 4% 79% IRS
1940 - 4.4% 81.1% IRS
1941 - 10% 81% IRS
1942-1943 - 19% 88% IRS
1944-1945 - 23% 94% IRS
1946-1947 - 19% 86.45% IRS
1948-1949 - 16.6% 82.13% IRS
1950 - 17.4% 84.36% IRS
1951 - 20.4% 91% IRS
1952-1953 - 22.2% 92% IRS
1954-1963 - 20% 91% IRS
1964 - 16% 77% IRS
1965-1967 - 14% 70% IRS
1968 - 14% 75.25% IRS
1969 - 14% 77% IRS
1970 - 14% 71.75% IRS
1971-1981 15 brackets 14% 70% IRS
1982-1986 12 brackets 12% 50% IRS
1987 5 brackets 11% 33% IRS
1988-1990 3 brackets 15% 28% IRS
1991-1992 3 brackets 15% 31% IRS
1993-2000 5 brackets 15% 39.6% IRS
2001 5 brackets 15% 39.1% IRS
2002 6 brackets 10% 38.6% IRS
2003-2009 6 brackets 10% 35% Tax Foundation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_tax_in_the_United_States

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No protest
at what income level would you levy this tax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. my personal opinion would be $200,000
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 05:38 PM by LSK
However, if it was up to me, I would create a super-rich bracket of say around $5million+ and tax it at least 50% or higher right now.

I understand that Obama puts the figure at $250,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Would you consider location to determine the level?
250k in NYC and San Francisco is not the same as Peoria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. no
Edited on Tue Mar-17-09 06:43 PM by LSK
Lot more jobs in NYC than Peoria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I disagree
Allowances should be made for cost of living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-17-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think that people who make $5 million a year should pay
a higher rate than people who make $500,000 a year.

$500,000 is a lot, but there is a big jump to $5million.

That top of the top group should pay the highest rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC