Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama, Why Did You Pay Blackwater $70 Million in February?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:31 AM
Original message
President Obama, Why Did You Pay Blackwater $70 Million in February?
President Obama, Why Did You Pay Blackwater $70 Million in February?

By Jeremy Scahill, AlterNet. Posted March 17, 2009.

Obama may keep the company on the government payroll months after its Iraq contract expires. Not bad for a firm supposedly going down in flames.


For those already outraged at the AIG bonus scandal, here is a fact that should add more fuel to the fire: The Obama administration has paid the mercenary firm formerly known as Blackwater nearly $70 million to operate in Iraq and, according to The Washington Times, may keep the company on the payroll months past the official expiration of its Iraq contract in May. I reviewed Blackwater's recent transactions with the Obama State Department and discovered a $45 million payment to Blackwater on February 4, 2009 for "protective services-Iraq." It is described as a "funding action only." Here is the interesting part: The estimated "Ultimate Completion Date" is 5/07/2011.

The Washington Times (as described below) reported on a $22 million payment to Blackwater on February 2. Combined with the $45 million payment I discovered, that's nearly $67 million in 72 hours. Not bad for a company supposedly going down in flames.

With the U.S. economy in shambles and millions of Americans struggling to make ends meet and keep their homes, Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton need to explain to U.S. taxpayers how they justify these mega-payments to a scandal-plagued mercenary company. (At the very least, someone should ask Robert Gibbs about it).

It has been widely reported that the Bush administration's preferred mercenary company, which recently renamed itself Xe, will soon be leaving Iraq. That news came early this year after the State Department, under immense public pressure, announced it would not renew the company's lucrative deal to act as the private paramilitary force for senior U.S. occupation officials. The Iraqi government has said it wants the company to leave Iraq and says it has revoked the company's operating license. The Obama administration continues to use Blackwater in Afghanistan and the company has extensive domestic training contracts with the military and law enforcement agencies inside the borders of the U.S.

<snip>

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/132171/president_obama,_why_did_you_pay_blackwater_$70_million_in_february/?cID=1163014#c1163014

Earlier this week, The Washington Post reported that some of Blackwater's armed operatives may simply be rehired by two other US mercenary firms that are expected to take over Blackwater's work in Iraq under the Obama administration...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/16/AR2009031602720.html?hpid=topnews">U.S. Moves to Replace Contractors in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Blackwater is a huge asset for the u.s. military.
That is just the way it is. Who is in the white house does not change the fact that Blackwater is needed.
Get out of iraq, and afghanistan, and maybe we can do without them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Asset?
You've got to be kidding. Well, I guess they consider Gitmo an asset too.

A gang of thugs who are the icing on the cake of obscene occupation of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They can do jobs that are dangerous
that don't require soldiers. That frees up soldiers to wage war. Every private contractor could be replaced with an active duty soldier. We would need a lot more soldiers. Either private contractors or soldiers, one or the other.
A positive side of the private contractors is that once they are finished with the job they are just let go. Soldiers are still on active duty getting almost the same pay whether they are waging war or sleeping in the barracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. They are lawless mercenaries.

Their only asset is plausible deniability. Have you not paid attention at all? Or are you OK with these swine slaughtering Iraqi civilians with utter impunity?

Or disarming citizens of New Orleans at the very time when the might most need self defense?

Private armies are nothing but trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Are you asserting they are so different than others?
American military personel have been brought up on charges of rape and murder.
Blackwater is not that different from the military, they have more freedom and are more aggressive. And they are being kicked out of Iraq after a few incidents. It is not like they have been running all over the place slaughtering villages. If you insist that they have, the prove it.

As for Katrina, I have read after action reports from LEOs that were there, and they were most certainly disarming people and shooting animals.
The video of the cop body slamming that old lady in her house breaking her hip, and taking her gun was a California Highway Patrol officer, not Blackwater.



Do you want President Obama to use the draft instead of Blackwater?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Do you want President Obama to use the draft instead of Blackwater? Yes.
The draft would have ended these senseless wars years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Then write him a letter.
Edited on Wed Mar-18-09 11:49 AM by Tim01
He isn't going to use the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. You asked. I said. I prefer US troops over Blackwater, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Ok, fair enough.
And my response could have been more polite. My apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. You make a good point but...
... there's still quite a bit to consider here.

_____________________________________

Its largest obtainable government contract is with the State Department, for providing security to US diplomats and facilities in Iraq. That contract began in 2003 with the company's $21 million no-bid deal to protect Iraq proconsul Paul Bremer. Blackwater has guarded the two subsequent US ambassadors, John Negroponte and Zalmay Khalilzad, as well as other diplomats and occupation offices. Its forces have protected more than ninety Congressional delegations in Iraq, including that of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. According to the latest government contract records, since June 2004 Blackwater has been awarded $750 million in State Department contracts alone. It is currently engaged in an intensive lobbying campaign to be sent into Darfur as a privatized peacekeeping force. Last October President Bush lifted some sanctions on Christian southern Sudan, paving the way for a potential Blackwater training mission there. In January the Washington, DC, representative for southern Sudan's regional government said he expected Blackwater to begin training the south's security forces soon.

Since 9/11 Blackwater has hired some well-connected officials close to the Bush Administration as senior executives. Among them are J. Cofer Black, former head of counterterrorism at the CIA and the man who led the hunt for Osama bin Laden after 9/11, and Joseph Schmitz, former Pentagon Inspector General, who was responsible for policing contractors like Blackwater during much of the "war on terror"--something he stood accused of not doing effectively. By the end of Schmitz's tenure, powerful Republican Senator Charles Grassley launched a Congressional probe into whether Schmitz had "quashed or redirected two ongoing criminal investigations" of senior Bush Administration officials. Under bipartisan fire, Schmitz resigned and signed up with Blackwater.

Despite its central role, Blackwater had largely operated in the shadows until March 31, 2004, when four of its private soldiers in Iraq were ambushed and killed in Falluja. A mob then burned the bodies and dragged them through the streets, stringing up two from a bridge over the Euphrates. In many ways it was the moment the Iraq War turned. US forces laid siege to Falluja days later, killing hundreds of people and displacing thousands, inflaming the fierce Iraqi resistance that haunts occupation forces to this day. For most Americans, it was the first they had heard of private soldiers. "People began to figure out this is quite a phenomenon," says Representative David Price, a North Carolina Democrat, who said he began monitoring the use of private contractors after Falluja. "I'm probably like most Congress members in kind of coming to this awareness and developing an interest in it" after the incident.

What is not so well-known is that in Washington after Falluja, Blackwater executives kicked into high gear, capitalizing on the company's newfound recognition. The day after the ambush, it hired the Alexander Strategy Group, a K Street lobbying firm run by former senior staffers of then-majority leader Tom DeLay before the firm's meltdown in the wake of the Jack Abramoff scandal. A week to the day after the ambush, Erik Prince was sitting down with at least four senior members of the Senate Armed Services Committee, including its chair, John Warner. Senator Rick Santorum arranged the meeting, which included Warner and two other key Republican senators--Appropriations Committee chair Ted Stevens of Alaska and George Allen of Virginia. This meeting followed an earlier series of face-to-faces Prince had had with powerful House Republicans who oversaw military contracts. Among them: DeLay; Porter Goss, chair of the House Intelligence Committee (and future CIA director); Duncan Hunter, chair of the House Armed Services Committee; and Representative Bill Young, chair of the House Appropriations Committee. What was discussed at these meetings remains a secret. But Blackwater was clearly positioning itself to make the most of its new fame. Indeed, two months later, Blackwater was handed one of the government's most valuable international security contracts, worth more than $300 million.

<snip>

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070402/scahill/2

Ultimately Blackwater is the by-product to privatize everything not nailed down. Well okay, the 'nailed-down' stuff as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Wow, that's some pretty murky stuff.
I'm positive the words inappropriate and possibly unethical apply here. Probably not illegal,but maybe it should.
Clearly they are exerting political influence for their own gain, which is no different from any other american business. But maybe things military should be held to a higher standard since the stakes are so very high.
I doubt anybody will listen to my suggestion though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. bullshit -- they take jobs AWAY from the soldiers
WHY the f*ck should we PAY *mercenaries* to do jobs the Army is already trained to do?

Blackwater is a THUG company, run by a crazed Christian weasel, and should be expunged from this country. they add NOTHING to this country - in fact their over-pumped homemade *GI Joes* have caused MORE damage to this country's image than we can possibly even know.

F*CK Blackwater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why didn't we need Blackwater in all our other wars?
US Military always did the job and I never heard a single complaint. Why all of a sudden is this Mercenary group essential to American Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. We had the draft in other wars.
Do you think drafting people who don't want to go to war is better than paying contractors who do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. Absolutely better. Mercenaries are a for profit enterprise.
There should be no companies profiting from jobs the US military could be doing in combat. The operations should be necessity based, not profit based. War for hire is wrong, and should be illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. oh, so Blackwater is to be defended as necessary now?
durn. who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Somebody had to do the job.
We can have more active duty military, or we can use private contractors. Or we can stop doing the job.
What other alternative are you thinking of?

Do you think it would go over well of Pres. Obama said he was going to send another 40 or 50 thousand military personel over to the hot spots? Is that your plan?

What is your solution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. If we weren't imperialist bastards

then we wouldn't need all of those troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. No dissagreement from me at all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Human Rights group sues Blackwater

December 20th, 2007 by Daniel Graeber
The Center for Constitutional Rights filed a second lawsuit Wednesday against Blackwater Worldwide for assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, wrongful death and war crimes. The second lawsuit concerns a Sept. 9 shooting in Baghdad that the prosecutors allege Blackwater guards fired into a crowd of civilians unprovoked. The lawsuit is filed on behalf of Ali Husaamaldeen Ibrahim al Bazzaz, whom the group says died during the incident.

The lawsuit refers to Blackwater guards as “shooters” and “mercenaries” operating without discretion in Iraq. The human rights groups relies on news reports from the incident, but the prosecutors say they will be able to use Blackwater's own documents for the trial against the security firm.

The first lawsuit filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights involves a Sept. 16 incident at Nisoor Square in downtown Baghdad where 17 Iraqi civilians died during a shoot-out between Blackwater guards and unidentified insurgents. Investigators found Blackwater security
personnel fired indiscriminately in 14 of the 17 shooting deaths of Iraqi civilians on Sept. 16. The FBI said the contractors violated deadly-force rules in effect for security contractors, suggesting the contractors acted recklessly. Officials familiar with the case say they are cynical about the ability to prosecute individuals in the case because the legal framework outlining government contractors is ambiguous and inadequate.

The legal framework outlining the use of private security contractors is not parallel to their operational framework. Iraqi law, as established under the Coalition Provisional Authority, states that contractors are immune from prosecution. Order 17, issued by L. Paul Bremer III, grants immunity from Iraqi law in exchange for prosecution of crimes in U.S. military courts. Yet, the legal status of contractors remains ambiguous. On one hand, contractors are not part of the military and therefore are not accountable to the U.S. Uniform Code of Military Justice, but to civilian laws. On the other hand, security contractors are part of the force package in Iraq, and cannot be held accountable under civilian laws.

In 2006, Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., amended the UCMJ to include contractors, but this too remains unclear as firms like Blackwater provide security to civilian agencies and are not integrated into military forces. Furthermore, prosecuting civilian contractors is hampered by environmental issues. A typical civilian would rely on an intact crime scene to provide evidence, but in the case of Iraq, that is something of a luxury. Proceeding under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act, which extends civilian laws to civilians supporting combat operations, may prove the ultimate avenue for examination.

http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/12/20/human-rights-group-sues-blackwater/Human Rights group sues Blackwater

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Good. Fuck Blackwater, and fuck the military machine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panAmerican Donating Member (864 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. Tim01 is right...
While Blackwater (now known as "Xe") may have acted horribly, the function they perform continue to be needed, so the administration will do nothing but shuffle them around.

This isn't the only misdirection I've observed by Obama. He's also going to keep troops in Iraq after the supposed withdrawal, but rename them. I don't see Obama keeping a lot of promises without continued engagement from "We, the people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. Oh the moral justification for mercs. Gotta love it.
just one of the many reasons Rome fell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. Obama is WEAK!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synicus Maximus Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. Could it be because Blackwater's contract required the
government to pay them $70 million for services rendered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Away with your common sense! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Stop trying to make sense
I hate Blackwater as much as the next person, but it would be nice to have a little more background info before we call for their heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
26. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
27. Fuck the mercenaries!
They murder innocents and get by w/it. They are above the law, just like the past administration.

My disappointment climbs higher each day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. Heh. Love the folks defending *Blackwater*. The brave new 'Murica! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC