Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Timmy's brilliant plan to recoup AIG bonuses.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:15 PM
Original message
Timmy's brilliant plan to recoup AIG bonuses.
http://finance.yahoo.com/techticker/article/211012/Geithner-Caves-on-AIG-Bonuses,-Defends-Liddy

Geithner Caves on AIG Bonuses, Defends Liddy
Posted Mar 18, 2009 10:32am EDT by Henry Blodget in Media, Newsmakers, Recession, Banking
Related: AIG, ^gspc, ^dji

From The Business Insider, March 18, 2009:

Tim Geithner is now completely on the defensive. In a long letter to Nancy Pelosi, he explained how and why he approved the AIG bonuses (troubling) and described a plan to "recoup" them. The letter will not likely stop the growing chorus of criticism that may well drive Geithner out of office.

Geithner's new plan will not "recoup" the bonuses at all: It will merely reduce the amount of the next taxpayer handout to AIG from $30 billion to $29.835 billion. This is not likely to quell the outrage: What most people are angy about is that AIG paid $165 million of taxpayer money in "retention" bonuses to executives who blew up the firm (many of whom aren't at the company anymore).

The more troubling part of the letter, though, is Tim Geithner's description of his own approval of the bonuses. He says he registered "strong objections" and then asked for a written legal analysis of why the bonuses had to paid. This does not sound like the behavior a man who has the balls necessary to stand up to the many constituencies that want to roll right over him right now (which is the kind of man we need during this crisis). It sounds like the behavior of a man who is already thinking of how to defend a decision he knows is a bad one.

--snip--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquamarina Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. This guy is completely tone deaf.
Yo, Timmy, only in the Bizzaro World do people get paid bonuses for destroying a company and the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. He, America's highest-ranking lawyer, asked for and deferred to a legal analysis
Edited on Wed Mar-18-09 01:22 PM by rocktivity
with EXACTLY the answer he wanted? Kind of like what Bush did with torture? Make an example of him, Barack--give him the boot!

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. The Sec of Treasury
is not the highest ranking lawyer. Attorney General holds that place. Eric Holder. Geithner should go, but he's not the cheif lawyer, nor highest ranking. The Pres in in fact an attorney...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. ...reduce the amount of the next taxpayer handout to AIG from $30 billion to $29.835 billion.....
Oh my.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Isn't that brilliant?
:rofl:

How much of a retention bonus did Timmy get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Geithner's a dead man walking....
Every Republican politician and commentator will be repeating Tim's suggestion for weeks....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. One of the heads reposted last night that Rham said Tims job is safe
The commentator on with the head said. If Rham is saying his job is safe, then it's a sure sign he about to go. Let's hope so.

Is it Rham or Rahm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. That's the Amount of the Bonuses
Are you laughing that they're so trivial in the grand scheme of things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You can't see the humor? It's like a hood saying "I'm not giving the $10 bucks I stole back....
but I'll tell you what: Deduct $10 from the next $1000 protection payment."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The Poster Appeared to be Implying
that Geithner only went after a fraction of a percent of what AIG had "stolen." He went after the full amount of the bonuses, which themselves happened to be a small fraction of AIG losses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. In the Grand Scheme of things a person who steals a hundred dollars goes to jail
for quite some time while tax payers are being bilked out of billions and loudly bragging about putting millions into their pockets..While to some, a few measly millions is not much money, try telling that to someone earning $12 bucks an hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's the problem with having insiders protecting their own. Just who is he looking out for
the American taxpayer or his future employers? His "deer caught in the headlights" look doesn't especially exude confidence. "Strong objections" doesn't muster it in these trying times. I don't understand how these bonuses can be okay with the administration. Geithner needs to answer some tough questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. sounds like one of HArry Reid's 'strongly worded letters.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-18-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey, it's Be Kind to Robber Barons Week
Ninth week in a row.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC