Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

15 "Moderate Democrats" (Joe Lieberman) Decide to Piss Me The FUCK OFF.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:35 AM
Original message
15 "Moderate Democrats" (Joe Lieberman) Decide to Piss Me The FUCK OFF.
It's temporarily called something like "The Practical Caucus."

Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., announced on MCNBC's "Morning Joe" this morning that he has formed a gang of 15 Democrats - yes, Democrats - in the Senate to essentially try to keep President Obama in check. The group is sending a message to the White House to not expect them to rubber stamp every proposal sent down Pennsylvania Avenue, particularly when it comes to spending, and that maybe Obama is trying to do too much, too fast. And since it takes 60 votes to get much done in the Senate, this group could be critical and essentially control the outcome of many pieces of legislation in the Senate.

"We're coalescing in a group to try to focus on making changes the American people need but to make sure they're done in a practical way that will actually work," Bayh said of his group of "moderate" Democrats. "We are not ideologues. We are pragmatic. We are not strident partisans. We care about our country more than our party."

While there's 12 names on the press release announcing the caucus, Bayh joked that "there are three or four others we're putting in the witness protection program who will attend meetings who don't want to be publicly identified yet."

Members include Sens. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Tom Carper of Delaware, Kent Conrad of North Dakota, and Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas. Bayh, who at one time was thought to be picked as Obama's running mate, even called Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, to give him the heads up. Known for having a temper, Emanuel's response was actually far from hot-headed; he even asked to come to the gang's first meeting.

"I think we have an ally in the White House who's going to help us strike the right balance," Bayh said.

Scarborough, laughing, said: "He was measuring you out for political body bags. Expect a dead fish on your doorstep."
Bayh: "I haven't received a mackerel at my house yet, Joe. Maybe they'll deliver it to yours by mistake."

Others joked that Harry Reid would move Bayh's suite into the Capitol parking lot.

Trying to maintain some sense of seriousness, Bayh said his group could be Obama and Reid's "best friend" - but it could also very well be just the opposite. The group could hold tremendous power.

From Politico:

"There is rising doubt among Democrats - particularly moderates already concerned about the big costs and deficits called for in Obama's budget - that either Obama or Washington have enough bandwidth this year to stimulate the economy, overhaul the failed financial sector and move on to a far-reaching domestic agenda. ...several lawmakers made clear that they have trouble with Obama's logic that deep economic troubles make it more urgent, not less, to take on expensive projects such as health care and education reform."

It should be interesting to see exactly what issue will spark the first faceoff between Bayh's crew and other Senate Democrats, Nancy Pelosi, or the White House. Whatever it is, it sure will be fun to watch.

http://news.aol.com/political-machine/2009/03/18/bayhs-new-gang-of-15-may-put-brakes-on-obama-agenda/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Forget Lieberman, put Bayh's name up there. He's inspiring this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes... you are right
But Lieberman is in there... What a fucking surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. And he claims Rahm will be their 'ally in the Whitehouse'
Great

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ha! Go, the WH, F&*k Lieberman. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B o d i Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. At least Bayh and Lieberman are being consistent. They did so much to keep Bush's spending in check.
Oh, wait.... nevermind... I'm thinking of an alternate universe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL!
Oh wait... Sarcasm is a lost art here. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B o d i Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. This seems like a good time to remind DUers of Evan Bayh's wife
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Don't do that!
Edited on Thu Mar-19-09 03:05 AM by QueenOfCalifornia
Someone's beautiful mind might get caught in the battle.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lieberman is not a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espiral Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Never truly was, either.
Someday, they'll send his traitorous ass packing back home to Patheticut...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QueenOfCalifornia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I want evidence
I mean just when did he go off the tracks?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. When was he ever on them?
He was elected in 1988 by running to the RIGHT of the Republican incumbent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. I am so pissed off about this I can barely speak.
We work our asses off and drain our pocketbooks to get a fucking Democratic majority in both Houses and the White House and what happens? Fifteen fucking Democrats turn themselves into Republicans. My new senator, Jeanne Shaheen, is among this group and I've been composing a letter to her in my head all night. Apparently this group plans to oppose health care reform because we don't have enough money. Thanks for the death sentence, assholes. (Sorry - I'm usually not this riled up in the morning. I should go back to bed and stay there today.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
espiral Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. re:
That is typical, though- most Democrats (who run for office)
tend to be lame compromisers who would still be considered
clearly rightist by nearly any other country's standards.
Anyone with the slightest hint of socialist leanings is run
out on the rails before ever even being able to run for
election. The US system is so badly corrupted, and plagued by
such endless two-party gridlock, it is almost darkly comical.
Popular democracy is a fool's game. The US knows nothing of
progressivism or real social justice. What else is new; and
why trust the system at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. They're called DINOs
Their only idea is to be obstructionists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bunch of fucking traitors. We don't need Democrats like these.
I suppose there's not a chance in hell of a true progressive Democrat beating these guys, since they're probably in very conservative districts. Doesn't mean I have to like them at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. I won't stand for you calling Joe a "moderate Democrat"
Holy Joe is an Independent. He caucuses with the Dems, but he's no longer a Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. Tell them to shove it!
The DNC needs to make abundantly clear to the blue dog Democrats they
need to toe the line, support the president, or not expect any funding
from the national committee. They are traitors to the Democratic party
and what our party stands for. They are going to weaken our success in
making the changes we need, and ensuring the Republicans never again
have the power to damage this country beyond belief. I will never send
another dime to the national party until it has a long-term strategy to
place progressive candidates in every race (as Dr. Dean successfully
managed) and put the squeeze on these traitors. The bi-partisan party of
the WASHINGTON party needs to be extinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. "The group is sending a message to the White House...
to not expect them to rubber stamp every proposal sent down Pennsylvania Avenue, particularly when it comes to spending..."

Is that really such a bad thing? It doesn't exactly sound like high treason to me, particularly since the government has been spending all the money it can print (and more) for the last eight years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC