Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SEN DODD: Obama Treasury Department pushed to cut language restricting bonuses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 08:52 AM
Original message
SEN DODD: Obama Treasury Department pushed to cut language restricting bonuses
Obama Treasury Department pushed to cut language restricting bonuses, senator says
John Byrne
Published: Thursday March 19, 2009

The Obama Administration's Treasury Department pushed to strip language that would have restricted the bonuses paid to staffers of bailed-out companies from the stimulus bill, a Democratic senator revealed late Wednesday.

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) disclosed that he was responsible for inserting a clause into the stimulus bill that allowed bailed-out firms to continue forward with eye-popping bonuses to executives that may have shared responsibility for some of the companies' woes in the first place.

In a step further, though, he told CNN that the language was sought by the Obama Administration's Treasury Department, which feared that the government would face lawsuits by including the provision.

A senior Treasury Department official purportedly confirmed Dodd's assessment. It remains unclear whether the Treasury Department knew the insurance behemoth AIG planned to pay some $165 million in bonuses to employees at the time.

The Connecticut Democrat appears to have gotten caught on the spot by the cable news network. On Tuesday, he told the network that he had nothing to do with the bonus language -- which now seems to have been a lie.

On Wednesday, a Treasury Department official confessed to CNN that the administration had pushed to have the bonus measure nixed, forcing Dodd's hand.

Dodd, when approached again, said the decision not to include language regarding bonuses "seemed like innocent modifications" at the time.

"I agreed reluctantly," Dodd said. "I was changing the amendment because others were insistent."

"The administration had expressed reservations," he added. "They asked for modifications. The alternative was losing the amendment entirely."

He further added that the change was made at the urging of Treasury Department staffers, and that he hadn't been contacted by senior Administration aides...

MORE AT RAWSTORY:
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Obama_Treasury_Department_pushed_for_language_0319.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Heck of a job, Timmy.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-19-09 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. the "Cramer defense"
'Dodd, when approached again, said the decision not to include language regarding bonuses "seemed like innocent modifications" at the time.'

In the face of $100k in AIG donations and the lies of the day before, we'd have to be pretty stupid to accept this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC