Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can anyone tell me about the deficits from the Bush years?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 10:47 PM
Original message
Can anyone tell me about the deficits from the Bush years?
And by that I mean including all the money spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which were not included in the accounting at the time?

The budget people now are saying that Obama's deficits are going to be sky-high, but I suspect that if the off-the-books money from Bush had been included in their deficits, then Obama's wouldn't look as awful as they do.

I'm sure as heck not an economist...(can you tell?) so I'm hoping my question makes enough sense to get some rational answers.

Thanks, everyone.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uhhhh.. No! Cause they shredded the books don't ya know! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the kick!
And boy, do I hope you're wrong!

About the book shredding, that is...;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. the trade deficit has decreased now
the deficit that bush gave us is in trillions
http://www.costofwar.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ah, thank you!
This link you gave me shows me what I thought was the case: The Bush deficits far overreach any Obama deficits.

Thank you!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. It doesn't seem to be a big jump

Obama's budget is barely bigger than Bushs. In 2009 Bush proposed a 3.1 trillion budget. In 2010 Obama is proposing a 3.55 trillion budget. Its an increase, but not a huge one. And of that 450 billion, a reasonable deal is the fact that Obama isn't using Bush's accounting tricks to hide the cost of war and natural disaster. I can't remember the exact figures, but it is something like 1-2 trillion over a decade that is hidden by Bush that Obama makes transparent. So add that in and Obama's budget is probably only 300-400 billion more than Bush's last year.
A budget increase of 10% is not too big, Bush did that from 2005-2006 and the GOP never blinked.

The fact that we are in the midst of a severe recession makes Obama's deficits different than the ones BUsh ran in 2002-2007, which were mostly due to bad decisions on Bush's part (tax cuts on the wealthy, unnecessary wars)

Also Obama is calling for a variety of new taxes to fund the spending. $600 billion over 10 years in cap/trade. Reversing the Bush tax cuts will (as a guess) raise $2 trillion. Changing deduction rules for those over 250k/year will raise $300 billion in a decade. Combined with the $2 trillion in spending cuts Obama talked about during his speech a few weeks ago and we are looking at about an extra 5 trillion in a decade in lower spending and higher taxes. Combined with ending the Iraq war (which McCain and the GOP wouldn't agree to) and it may be 6 trillion or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thank you!
Your detailed response was just what I was looking for. I will study it and even now, at first glance, I can tell it makes sense.

I am a bit confused by your last paragraph, esp. this sentence:

Combined with ending the Iraq war (which McCain and the GOP wouldn't agree to) and it may be 6 trillion or more.

What does the $6 trillion refer to? Sorry to be dense!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. 6 trillion in higher revenue and lower taxes in the next decade
Edited on Fri Mar-20-09 11:43 PM by Juche
Obama talked about cutting $2 trillion in spending when he gave a speech a few weeks ago. He has also put cap/trade and some new tax laws into effect for the well off that'll raise $1 trillion over the next decade. Combined with letting the Bush tax cuts expire and Obama will likely get 5 trillion in new revenue or less spending than a GOP president would have done.

And since McCain wanted to stay in Iraq and Obama wants to leave, that could easily save us another trillion or so in lower spending. So I'm guessing Obama's policies will either save or create $6 trillion for the federal government between 2010 and 2020.



Also Obama's healthcare plan is based on ideas from the commonwealth fund, which has said if their ideas are implemented the US would save about $3 trillion in lower healthcare costs over the next decade.

http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/Publications/Fund-Reports/2009/Feb/The-Path-to-a-High-Performance-US-Health-System.aspx

So add that in, and add in the savings from Obama's energy policy which will result in lower electric costs, higher MPG cars, cheaper fuels, lower energy needs for autos, businesses and homes, etc. and we will see cheaper energy with less of a need for it.

The way I see it if you add it all together the policies Obama is pushing (the healthcare changes, the tax policy changes, Iraq, energy) Obama is likely going to save the country about $7 trillion in spending on both public/private things while raising an extra $3 trillion in revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you for the details.
That really helps.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC