Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Larisa Alexandrovna @ HuffPo: Dershowitz Needs Refresher Course On What McCarthyism Was

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 08:57 PM
Original message
Larisa Alexandrovna @ HuffPo: Dershowitz Needs Refresher Course On What McCarthyism Was
Edited on Sat Mar-21-09 09:01 PM by Hissyspit
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larisa-alexandrovna/dershowitz-needs-a-refres_b_177695.html

Larisa Alexandrovna
Posted March 21, 2009 | 07:54 PM (EST)

Dershowitz needs a refresher course on what McCarthyism was...

Apparently acclaimed attorney Alan Dershowitz does not correctly recall what McCarthyism was.

The esteemed trial lawyer and Harvard professor says the following in defense of John Yoo, of all people:

UC Berkeley leaders are wrestling with that decision as a federal investigation into John Yoo's legal advice to the Bush Administration apparently winds down. The dilemma is rare. At risk are the tenets of academic freedom that have long allowed college faculty members to speak their minds in the name of scholarship. Yoo's case revolves around his advice on dealing with accused terrorists,including a notorious memo that provides legal justification for torture. Yoo, who is temporarily teaching at Orange County's Chapman University, has long attracted protests on his home campus, but some surprising allies have come to his defense.

"I think this is simply a left-wing version of McCarthyism," said Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard Law School professor who disagrees strongly with Yoo's views on torture. "He should be judged solely on the merits of his academics."

But Berkeley administrators and faculty leaders said they would be concerned about Yoo teaching law students if he were found to have violated ethical or legal standards. Critics have called Yoo a yes-man for President George W. Bush, essentially telling him what he wanted to hear.

Dershowitz does not disagree strongly with Yoo on torture as some of you will recall. But that is beside the point. Yoo was hired to teach law. If he has broken the law or broken with ethical standards, then how does that qualify him to teach the topic to law students? But I do remember this argument well, as it has been used before and for the same reasons.

During the Nuremberg trials, lawyers were held accountable for providing legal cover for the illegal and immoral. Mr. Dershowitz might want to visit the Harvard Nuremberg collection in his free time. Breaking the law or knowingly misrepresenting the law so that your boss can engage in criminal activity does not compare in the slightest to the activities of Sen. Joe McCarthy's political targets. The late Senator hunted people who broke no law and engaged in no illegal conduct. He hunted them for their political views as the sole criteria and destroyed many lives in the process.

- snip -

What Yoo happens to have in common with the victims of McCarthy is that he happens to be considered an intellectual, but that is where the comparison ends. Unlike McCarthy's victims, Yoo did not simply lecture on a topic unpopular with a certain political point of view. He did not only assign homework to his students that was somehow seen as un-American. He did not have a few meetings with people of like mind who were seen as undesirables by certain politicians.

- snip -

What Yoo is accused of doing, however, is actually acting to assist others in law-breaking by perverting and twisting the law for his own ambitions. Yoo gave Bush officials a green light legally - knowing this was illegal of course - to break the law on something as basic as human rights, on the right of an accused to a fair trial, on the rights of all not to be refused legal assistance at the whim of a single man drunk on power and acting as the sole ruler of a republic.

- snip -

Where you could have been a shining light sir, you have become part of the dark blotch known as the Bush administration in the annals of American history. One has to wonder what Dershowitz's motive is. He has not cried McCarthyism when the facts of the Siegelman or Minor prosecutions became known. He has not rushed to offer his legal expertise to the victims of Bush's DOJ and the Stasi-like tactics employed by attorneys who violated ethical standards and likely violated the law for political reasons.

He has made no effort in recent years to help those who have been denied the very basic freedoms he claims to care about. Instead, he has spent his recent years defending an administration so un-American that I wager even McCarthy would have been shocked back into sanity had he seen the goings on of the last 8 years.

For shame Mr. Dershowitz.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dershowitz doesn't know a damn thing about the law.
He is an annoying sophist who slimily shoehorned himself into a cushy Harvard job he isn't qualified for. I'd feel more comfortable listening to law advice from Clarence Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. There is a shorter description of him:
Twerp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Digg it here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reversal of Genius.
You know when a guy like Dershowitz says that it's okay to torture some innocent people in order to torture some guilty people in order to potentially protect the rest of us that he's lost whatever understanding he ever had about the meaning of the rule of law.


Thanks to Larisa for taking on this kind of insane perversion of American justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. He is a liar.
He was all gung ho for torture since the get go, as long as it was Muslims on the receiving end. He is an member of the extreme "the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim" wing of American politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. And here I thought Dershowitz was only an apologist for Israeli law violations.
At least hes consistent?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dershowitz sees Israel in everything the Bush administration did
He and Lieberman need to move before they're too old to enjoy living there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Evidence of Yoo's legal pandering was on display long before Berkeley offered him a position.
I was shocked when he was offered a position to teach. He may have a good grasp on what you might be able to get away with, but no clue about the spirit and importance of the Constitution or Bill of Rights and what both still mean to the fabric of our country.

As accomplished and renowned as he may be for his stint with the illegitimate Resident, John Yoo is a worthless piece of shit when it comes to the application of the laws we've fought and died for since the 1700's.

Delusional doesn't begin to describe John Yoo's legal opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. Dershowitz was an advocate for torture long before 9/11
I would even say that he "planted the seed" in many neocon minds that torture could be used in "certain cases".

Of course, those "certain cases" expanded beyond control. Like torture ALWAYS does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Larissa is brilliant & expresses it with class.
And Dershowitz is scum. Utter, complete scum. I rarely express, and try hard not to have, scathing opinions about anyone. I have a large enough log in my own eye. Dershowitz, however, is one soul that disgusts me every time I see him or read anything he wrote. He oozes.

These are the nicest adjectives I can use about him: he's a shameless, loud-mouthed, opinionated, frequently bigoted egotistical scum who whores his opinions for money & fame.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC