Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hypocrisy: GOP Urged Gore to Concede, But Not Coleman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 10:58 PM
Original message
Hypocrisy: GOP Urged Gore to Concede, But Not Coleman
Why won't the GOP quit beating a dead horse. Coleman lost. The country need Franken's leadership. There is a crisis in leadership. Gridlock is not an option. Isn't that what the GOP was saying in 2000?

Give it up.



It’s been almost 75 days since Democrat Al Franken was certified as the winner of the 2008 Minnesota Senate election. The initial ballot count put the two men within 215 votes of each other, triggering a statutorily mandated recount. When the dust settled, Franken was up 225 votes. Ever since then, Minnesota has been short a Senator in Washington while Coleman exhausts every last legal maneuver he can think of....

What should outrage Democrats is this: when Al Gore was asking for some due diligence in the Florida recount back in 2000, these Republicans were singing a different tune, while Democrats were calling for their own guy to throw in the towel for the good of the country....

Oklahoma Republican JC Watts put in his two cents as well: "How many defeats are enough? The time has come for the vice president to admit defeat, concede gracefully and allow our nation to move forward with the transition of power."

http://www.eyesonobama.com/blog/content/id_49277/title_Hypocrisy-GOP-Urged-Gore-to-Concede-But-Not-Coleman/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. NOT hypocricy.
They're doing what's good for themselves; they don't want another D in the Senate, so they're delaying it for as long as they can. Simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. At one point, when Coleman was ahead, they wanted Franken to concede
nothing new here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. What point are they up to with Franken/Coleman? And can Franken sue Coleman? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC