Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rebuilding federal agencies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 08:13 PM
Original message
Rebuilding federal agencies
The Next FEMA
Barack Obama must begin rebuilding federal agencies fast—or risk seeing his entire agenda undermined.
By John D. Donahue and Max Stier
Every two years the federal government conducts a "Human Capital Survey" of its own employees. Nearly a quarter of a million civil servants participate, providing anonymous, detailed, and often quite revealing answers to questions about their own agencies: What’s the level of morale and teamwork? Do their skills match their missions? Do they have the resources to get the job done? How able and trustworthy are their leaders? Are high-performing employees promoted, and the lazy and incompetent shown the door?

When the answers to these questions are processed and released by the Office of Personnel Management they fuel some watercooler banter, and that’s usually about it. Administration officials mostly ignore the results. Congress, which mandated the survey, pays little attention; the press, virtually none. The nonprofit Partnership for Public Service (headed by one of the authors of this article) uses the data, with some statistical refinements, to prepare a more detailed and accessible set of agency rankings dubbed "Best Places to Work in the Federal Government." But even this version is mostly inside baseball, discussed largely by civil servants themselves. To the average American, and even to most public policy mavens, what bureaucrats think about their bureaucracies is the very definition of dull.

Yet there’s a reason why top private-sector companies conduct similar surveys of their employees: such data can provide precious insight into an organization’s strengths and weaknesses, and an early-warning sensor for trouble ahead. Had anybody bothered to look at the results of the 2002 federal survey (released in 2003), they would have found that the cabinet agency ranked dead last was the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Inside a dusty control room, buried deep in the federal government’s bureaucratic machinery, this warning light was blinking furiously. Few people noticed—until, of course, Hurricane Katrina hit two years later, and FEMA’s feebleness was inside baseball no more.

Today, across our federal government, other warning lights are flashing. And if the president-elect and his team are wise, they will pay attention, because some of the most dysfunctional agencies happen to have jurisdiction over some of the most urgent challenges the new president is likely to face. Consider:

(more)

--Washington Monthly



The article shows where a few departments/agencies ranked in the "Human Capital Survey" (out of 222):
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services which oversee Medicare and Medicaid ranked 186th

the Office of Thrift Supervision, which oversees federally chartered savings and loans (like WaMu) ranked 192nd

the FAA ranked 204th

the Defense Contract Management Agency that is charged with oversight of about 18,000 private companies providing billions of dollars’ worth of goods and services to the military ranked 206th

the Defense Nuclear Detection Office, that is supposed to prevent terrorists from smuggling nuclear materials into our country ranked 208th

INS's replacement, the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement ranked 213rd

FEMA ranked 211th


But, the article is more than just a list of rankings, there is a whole lot more.

Check it out

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. In my old agency, it was so bad ...
we had DNR on the back of our IDs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. THAT is GREAT!!!
You're out now, eh? Breathing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I worked for the Feds for 20 years,
and never saw such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No.23 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Did you work for Uncle Sam when Al Gore...
was charged by Bill Clinton to "reinvent" how the Federal Government conducted business and served its clients?

I thought he did a great job, in the agencies that dealt with.

Many employees felt empowered to be able to have a significant change (remember the Reengineering Labs?) in how business was conducted in their agencies.

Did you see any of this where you were?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, I was there then, before and after.
Edited on Mon Mar-23-09 08:54 PM by elleng
No, I saw no changes.

Continued harping on 'deregulation,' had been going on, and on, and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No.23 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's too bad.
Edited on Mon Mar-23-09 08:56 PM by No.23
And I'm sorry to hear that.

I collected a check from Uncle Sam then, and I saw significant changes in how business was conducted in several agencies.

Largely because rank and file employees were empowered to make those changes.

Sorry to hear that you didn't see evidence of that where you were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks. I'm still collecting (retirement.)
Rank and file had not much to say where I was. Substantive decisions were largely politics/'economist' based.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I didn't see any changes either.
There was a lot of talk but no substance. I hated transitions. The career employees were disprespected and usually considered "hostiles".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Career 'disrespected?'
I didn't find that (at ICC.) Where were you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I was at NARA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No.23 Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Self-deleted...
Edited on Mon Mar-23-09 08:41 PM by No.23
because of a duplication of posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-23-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Federal and State workers have been starved for more than a decade
Edited on Mon Mar-23-09 08:33 PM by ProgressiveProfessor
Even under Clinton they got little to no respect. Out sourcing gov work to contractors was only the tip of the iceberg. A small benefit of the current recession is that some who were going to retire are now going to wait it out so the brain drain will not be as bad as it could have been and certainly would have been under McCain. The bad part is that rebuilding things will take money that the Gov does not really have right now. The Repukes will have succeeded in crippled the Gov for the next generation if something is not done soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-24-09 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. The GOP wants to prove that the government is incompetent.
But, it only seems to be true when the GOP is running things.

They're hoping people can't tell the difference between government and administration.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC