What reasons are being given for the long delay in ruling on Franken and Coleman case?
Both sides rested their case over a week ago. Why the delay in giving a ruling? It really can't be that difficult of a case. Either Franken won the recount or he didn't.. Are they just trying for more publicity?
It's more complicated than you think. There are several issues the panel of judges has to decide, and they have to write an opinion on each of the issues. All cases like this take time. The judges have probably assigned the opinion writing to each judge to keep it balanced.
They've probably already decided on the outcome, but it won't be revealed until the opinions are written. That's how this stuff works.
I expect two to three weeks from the end of the hearings.
7. No, there's nothing wrong with the system in Minnesota.
It was an extraordinarily close race. And it switched from one candidate to the other in the recount. Justice not only has to be done, but it has to be seen to be done.
The complexity was introduced by it being so close on the original count. The recount was automatically triggered. MN law provides that either candidate may challenge the recount in court. That is what happened.
How would you do it otherwise in the same situation?
Franken will win. Franken will be seated. It won't be rushed. In my opinion, it should not be rushed.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.