Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HARVEY WASSERMANN: People Died at Three-Mile Island (30th Anniversary)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:04 AM
Original message
HARVEY WASSERMANN: People Died at Three-Mile Island (30th Anniversary)
People Died at Three Mile Island
By Harvey Wasserman


People died---and are still dying---at Three Mile Island.

As the thirtieth anniversary of America's most infamous industrial accident approaches, we mourn the deaths that accompanied the biggest string of lies ever told in US industrial history.

As news of the accident poured into the global media, the public was assured there were no radiation releases.

That quickly proved to be false.

The public was then told the releases were controlled and done purposely to alleviate pressure on the core.

Both those assertions were false.

The public was told the releases were "insignificant."

But stack monitors were saturated and unusable, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission later told Congress it did not know---and STILL does not know---how much radiation was released at Three Mile Island, or where it went.

Using unsubstantiated estimates of how much radiation was released, the government issued average doses allegedly received by people in the region, which it assured the public were safe. But the estimates were utterly meaningless, among other things ignoring the likelihood that high doses of concentrated fallout could come down heavily on specific areas.

Official estimates said a uniform dose to all persons in the region was equivalent to a single chest x-ray. But pregnant women are no longer x-rayed because it has long been known a single dose can do catastrophic damage to an embryo or fetus in utero.

The public was told there was no melting of fuel inside the core.

But robotic cameras later showed a very substantial portion of the fuel did melt.

The public was told there was no danger of an explosion.

But there was, as there had been at Michigan's Fermi reactor in 1966. In 1986, Chernobyl Unit Four did explode.

The public was told there was no need to evacuate anyone from the area.

But Pennsylvania Governor Richard Thornburgh then evacuated pregnant women and small children. Unfortunately, many were sent to nearby Hershey, which was showered with fallout.

In fact, the entire region should have been immediately evacuated. It is standard wisdom in the health physics community that---due in part to the extreme vulnerability of human embryos, fetuses and small children, as well as the weaknesses of old age---there is no safe dose of radiation, and none will ever be found.

The public was assured the government would follow up with meticulous studies of the health impacts of the accident.

In fact, the state of Pennsylvania hid the health impacts, including deletion of cancers from the public record, abolition of the state's tumor registry, misrepresentation of the impacts it could not hide (including an apparent tripling of the infant death rate in nearby Harrisburg) and much more.

The federal government did nothing to track the health histories of the region's residents.

In fact, the most reliable studies were conducted by local residents like Jane Lee and Mary Osborne, who went door-to-door in neighborhoods where the fallout was thought to be worst. Their surveys showed very substantial plagues of cancer, leukemia, birth defects, respiratory problems, hair loss, rashes, lesions and much more...

SNIP

...As the pushers of the "nuclear renaissance" demand massive tax- and rate-payer subsidies to build yet another generation of reactors, they cynically stonewall the obvious death toll that continues to
mount at the site of an accident that happened thirty years ago. The "see no evil" mantra continues to define all official approaches to the victims of this horrific disaster.

Ironically, like Chernobyl, Three Mile Island Unit Two was a state-of-the-art reactor. Its official opening came on December 28, 1978, and it melted exactly three months later. Had it operated longer,
the accumulated radiation spewing from its core almost certainly would have been far greater.

Every reactor now operating in the US is much older---nearly all fully three decades older---than TMI-2 when it melted. Their potential fallout that could dwarf what came down in 1979.

But the Big Lie remains officially in tact. Expect to hear all week that TMI was "a success story" because "no one was killed."

But in mere moments that brand new reactor morphed from a $900 million asset to a multi-billion-dollar liability. It could happen to any atomic power plant, now, tomorrow and into the future.

Meanwhile, the death toll from America's worst industrial catastrophe continues to rise. More than ever, it is shrouded in official lies and desecrated by a reactor-pushing "renaissance" hell-bent on repeating the nightmare on an even larger scale.

http://www.nukefree.org/news/peoplediedatthreemileisland
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow. No response. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. don't sweat it. it's a slow day apaprently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, I'm responding to the article and say; "WOW"! but i'm not surprised
this information has been witheld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. i never knew the full scale of 3 mile. crazy stuff.
thanks for posting this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. My cousin was 3 months pregnant and living in that area
when the accident happened. Her daughter, born in Sept '79, was diagnosed with cancer when she was 21.
We will always wonder if the cancer was the result of Three Mile Island.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. k&r (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. "there is no safe dose of radiation, and none will ever be found"
Uh, we're exposed to radiation all the time. People at high elevations are exposed to even more. Life on Earth has been exposed to radiation since it began.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. How many people have died in automobile accidents in the last thirty years?
Or by coal mining? Or by breathing dirty air?

How many people have been killed by eating red meat every day, or trans-fats, or high fructose corn syrup?

How many people have been killed by smoking or drinking? Especially people who don't smoke or drink?

How many people have been killed by antibiotic resistant pathogens?

How many people have been killed by climate change? How many people will die because of climate change?

Yes, nuclear energy kills people too, but the mechanisms are no different than any other industry -- toxins spill, machines fail, etc., etc., etc.. Nevertheless nuclear power has a much better safety record than most industrial activities and the toxic wastes are better contained. Nobody is blowing them out of smoke stacks or keeping them in fragile sludge ponds. Don't forget, poisons like mercury have a half life of forever.

Three Mile Island was a memorable industrial accident, but I suspect our recent follies with corn ethanol have killed more people and burned through a lot more capital.

Life goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. this had to be the worst attempt at marginalizing the dangers
of nuclear power plants I have ever seen. The things people will say... wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Horrors. How dare I insult our god, the Mighty Atom!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. The only thing that's green about nuclear, is the leftover waste.
The only safe form of energy is solar.

All of the energy we use today, aside from nuclear, geothermal, and tidal is derived originally from energy from solar energy. Using ethanol, natural gas, oil (and therefore gasoline) and coal are all sources of solar energy, just roundabout ways of getting it. We humans are powered by solar energy as well, that's what everything is powered by for the most part, aside from microbes that thrive around sea vents.

We must use high altitude airships to collect solar energy above the clouds, without the launch costs of orbital solar. We can use the gas envelope of the airship as a reflector dish, and have it aimed at a collector tower at the top. The ship will then beam the energy to earth via microwave, a process that's already been pioneered on earth and show highly efficient at transferring energy. A ground based receiver station will then convert the energy into usable electricity.

This simple plan, based upon airship technology that's well understood, will allow our country to break free of fossil fuels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. wind is safe, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not if my dog breaks it.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bull fucking shit.
This is some seriously misleading, dishonest and hyperbolic fear-mongering rubbish.

The entire premise is that any, even small, exposure to radiation is life threatening, therefore there MUST be deaths associated with TMI. The proof? That concerned neighbours who knocked on doors--at what point in time and with what methodology we are of course not told--and found that some of their neighbours had cancer and rashes. Seriously, this is the stated proof. Then the author cites studies that state that there is no link between TMI and cancer rates, and asserts that what they really meant was that there is a link. Oh and apparently if you use the word "plague" enough it means a plague is happening. Wow. I'm convinced now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC