Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Health Insurance Industry Scared to Death

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BonnieJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:11 AM
Original message
Health Insurance Industry Scared to Death
Insurers Offer to Stop Charging Sick People More

http://www.truthout.org/032509O

Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, The Associated Press: "The health insurance industry offered Tuesday for the first time to curb its controversial practice of charging higher premiums to people with a history of medical problems. The offer from America's Health Insurance Plans and the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association is a potentially significant shift in the debate over reforming the nation's health care system to rein in costs and cover an estimated 48 million uninsured people. It was contained in a letter to key senators. In the letter, the two insurance industry groups said their members are willing to 'phase out the practice of varying premiums based on health status in the individual market' if all Americans are required to get coverage. Although the letter left open some loopholes, it was still seen as a major development."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama is allowing the insurance companies the privilege of continuing to exist
It's not a privilege that I would grant, but he is, and the insurance industry had better damn well be grateful for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. hopefully they will be extinct one day
and replaced with a national healthcare system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. "if all Americans are required to get coverage"
i don't get the implications of this bit....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It has to be unconstitutional to force us to buy insurance
That is not a health 'care' plan! :grr: :grr: :grr:

I have to get away from this place, reality is really pissing me off today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. But it is Obama's Heath Care Plan.
A major part of his plan is that everyone must have health insurance and that if one can not afford it then the Government will step in and help, but to get the insurance companies to lower their costs and put out a group rate that has no special pricing for anyone it requires that every single American participate. It still is going to fall largely on employers though and that will not help business in a Global Market. We must get to the point of Single Payer National Health Care if our business' will be able to compete. Every other business in the world is free from this enormous expense, so can be far more competitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I thought Obama was for having a choice...
and Hillary's was the 'must have' plan.

I guess I got that wrong.


Either way... yes, we all need to push hard for HR 676.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Certainly not correct. States around the country have required
motorists to be insured for as long as I can remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The difference is you can choose not to drive a car. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. that is unconstitutional as well-the founders did not want us to be forced to support a corporation
but the prices of auto insurance should drop drastically if we had universal health coverage because so much of the premium is based on medical costs in the event of an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I believe, as Dr Dean does, that the Obama plan as
described during the campaign--which included a "public" coverage similar to the Medicare program--is the way to go. That would give everyone an option that is not a for profit "corporation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. We are already being forced to buy health insurance ...it just isn't for us until we retire at 65.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Same here.
They will "phase out" the varying premiums if everyone is forced to take their insurance. Notice they don't say it will result in lower premiums, just that all will pay the same rate. I am not taking this BS as any kind of a step forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's exactly what I thought when I heard of their "kind proposal"!
They ought to be afraid.....of course they're bribing us with the 'if all Americans are required to get coverage' stipulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama has to offer a comprehensive government plan to, first insure the
uninsured and poor, but secondly for the public to buy into if they don't want a private plan. Otherwise, this offer is smoke and mirrors. Insurance companies are not going to change their stripes but try to disguise them until they can secure their present strangle hold on health care permanently. The public and health care providers will be left out in the cold as usual while they deliver profits to Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Does this mean the movement behind single-payer gaining momentum?
I hope so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. scared? They are laughing at us...
Sure, if we are forced to buy insurance, they will let us give them our money. How nice :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Thats no concession.
Many insurance companies aren't CHARGING more for pre-existing conditions they are FLAT OUT REFUSING to cover them! So this argument is total bullshit. Yeah the would love to have MANDATORY insurance for everyone. But even if you are quote unquote "covered" that doesn't mean you are going to have your claims paid for.
Signed, one chronically ill person who even though has coverage has had to fight tooth and claw to get actually payment of claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. yes, they will cover us but probably continue to increase copays
Edited on Wed Mar-25-09 11:14 AM by Fireweed247
not pay for anesthesia etc.

We have to get rid of the insurance companies completely and Obama is a smart guy, he knows this. It is just that the insurance companies are speaking louder. We need to start protesting LOUDLY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Isn't this what the insurance cos.
claimed in regards to MA's health-insurance-at-gunpoint law (GingrichCare), and it's bogus? They simply raised their rates even higher, even after they claimed they wouldn't.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
19. Fuck them. Their whole business model is based on......
screwing those that can least afford to be screwed, the sick. There would be no business plan without the ability to fuck people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
20.  Half of Bankruptcy Due to Medical Bills -- U.S. Study
"Half of all U.S. bankruptcies are caused by soaring medical bills and most people sent into debt by illness are middle-class workers with health insurance, researchers said on Wednesday....

"Most of the medically bankrupt were average Americans who happened to get sick. Health insurance offered little protection."...

"Among those whose illnesses led to bankruptcy, out-of-pocket costs averaged $11,854 since the start of illness; 75.7 percent had insurance at the onset of illness."...

He said fewer than 1 percent of all bankruptcy filings were due to credit card debt. "That truly is a myth," Cauthen said in a telephone interview."

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0202-08.htm

And this is from 2005...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. The fact remains: They are in business to maximize their profits.
This "concession" notwithstanding, the insurance companies will continue to find ways to suck money out of the health care system for their own profits. I'm not saying they are evil for trying to make a profit, because they are legally OBLIGATED to do so, and that will not change. My question is: What value do they offer (compared to a non-profit, single-payer system) that justifies their profits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC