Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gareth Porter: Despite Obama’s Vow, Combat Brigades Will Stay in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:03 PM
Original message
Gareth Porter: Despite Obama’s Vow, Combat Brigades Will Stay in Iraq
WASHINGTON, Mar 25 (IPS) - Despite President Barack Obama’s statement at Camp LeJeune, North Carolina Feb. 27 that he had "chosen a timeline that will remove our combat brigades over the next 18 months," a number of Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs), which have been the basic U.S. Army combat unit in Iraq for six years, will remain in Iraq after that date under a new non-combat label.

A spokesman for Defence Secretary Robert M. Gates, Lt. Col. Patrick S. Ryder, told IPS Tuesday that "several advisory and assistance brigades" would be part of a U.S. command in Iraq that will be "re-designated" as a "transition force headquarters" after August 2010.

But the "advisory and assistance brigades" to remain in Iraq after that date will in fact be the same as BCTs, except for the addition of a few dozen officers who would carry out the advice and assistance missions, according to military officials involved in the planning process.

Gates has hinted that the withdrawal of combat brigades will be accomplished through an administrative sleight of hand rather than by actually withdrawing all the combat brigade teams. Appearing on Meet the Press Mar. 1, Gates said the "transition force" would have "a very different kind of mission", and that the units remaining in Iraq "will be characterized differently".

"They will be called advisory and assistance brigades," said Gates. "They won't be called combat brigades."


read more: http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=46264
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Actually, this is exactly what Obama said he was going to do.
There's nothing new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Did he mention it during the general campaign? During the primaries?
Got a link for that? If not, no problem.

I came away with the impression that America would be OUT of Iraq, should Obama become President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Then you weren't paying attention
Edited on Wed Mar-25-09 01:30 PM by Renew Deal
His campaign website is still up.

"Under the Obama-Biden plan, a residual force will remain in Iraq and in the region to conduct targeted counter-terrorism missions against al Qaeda in Iraq and to protect American diplomatic and civilian personnel. They will not build permanent bases in Iraq, but will continue efforts to train and support the Iraqi security forces as long as Iraqi leaders move toward political reconciliation and away from sectarianism."

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/iraq/#phased-withdrawal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. ''...a residual force.''
All the bases and that enormous embassy will require more than a residual force. In fact, it sounds like the job requires several combat brigades. Gee. Several brigades make up a division. And that's a hell of a lot of men and women.

FWIW, I am dissapointed. Obama said he'd end the war in Iraq and bring the troops home. So far, he's moved troops to Afghanistan. That's also stupid and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And all what he promised.
He promise to end combat in Iraq, and bring the troops home. He said it would be a staggered withdrawal. And he said he wanted more troops in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdab1973 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. We are currently in the process of handing over bases to the Iraqi forces...
but it's not something that will happen overnight...it takes time. I've personally flown the Iraqi survey teams to the various military installations around here...they are very busy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. "Let me say this as plainly as I can:
By August 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end."

As we carry out this drawdown, my highest priority will be the safety and security of our troops and civilians in Iraq. We will proceed carefully, and I will consult closely with my military commanders on the ground and with the Iraqi government. There will surely be difficult periods and tactical adjustments. But our enemies should be left with no doubt: this plan gives our military the forces and the flexibility they need to support our Iraqi partners, and to succeed.

After we remove our combat brigades, our mission will change from combat to supporting the Iraqi government and its Security Forces as they take the absolute lead in securing their country. As I have long said, we will retain a transitional force to carry out three distinct functions: training, equipping, and advising Iraqi Security Forces as long as they remain non-sectarian; conducting targeted counter-terrorism missions; and protecting our ongoing civilian and military efforts within Iraq. Initially, this force will likely be made up of 35-50,000 U.S. troops.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-of-President-Barack-Obama-Responsibly-Ending-the-War-in-Iraq/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. What else is new?
Same old shit, different boss. Beware in military industrial complex!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoseGaspar Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. Shameless
They won't even reorganize and make a show of it. They will simply re-label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Different host, same show. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC