Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Liddy's $1 salary begs the question is he due for some huge bonus when his job is done?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
C......N......C Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:04 PM
Original message
Liddy's $1 salary begs the question is he due for some huge bonus when his job is done?
I find it hard to believe that his only pay for his job as head of AIG is only going to net him $1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a legit question
in light of the other arrangements.

It sounds like it was all an elaborate tax avoidance scheme.

What's the tax rate on a "bonus" as opposed to salary at that level?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. It's the same. Ordinary income. I made the mistake last week of assuming it was higher.
Depending on how you have withholding set up, a bonus can be withheld at a higher rate but it all comes out in the end. I'd expect that the kind of bonus Liddy gets would be taxed at the maximum 35% marginal rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C......N......C Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. So he is not working for $1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Well, it depends on if he gets a bonus and how much it is. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. All of it would not be taxed at 35% if he received any type of income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't care if they get huge bonuses if they fix the problem
I do have a problem with TARP recipients getting automatic bonuses just for gracing us with their presence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C......N......C Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. This is what got us here in the first place.
"I don't care if they get huge bonuses if they fix the problem" Nobody cared what they did as long as they made the stockholders money.
20% market growth !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I'm not arguing the same thing. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. $742,006.40, after taxes -- paid on March 16 . . .
this is on the second page of the NYT piece.

So no, he didn't agree to work for $1 a year -- he agreed to work for two paychecks a year: $1 up front, bookoo bucks at close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C......N......C Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. They made reference to the $1 at the hearings, thanking him for it !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Did you read the article?
That wasn't Liddy bonus. That was the bonus of the man who wrote an open letter TO Liddy in NYT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. you're not talking about Liddy
That's Jake DeSantis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jljamison Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't care either

If Liddy succeeds in selling off chunks of AIG and bringing the company and its stock price back up such that the 80% stake owned by the taxpayers can be sold either to recoup the 180 billion invested, or even make some money, he deserves a huge bonus. Perhaps though he should get a bonus in the form of stock options that vest over time, so that he has to manage he recovery for the long term, rather than a single quarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C......N......C Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. You know, I don't care either what he gets, but why are they saying
he is doing it for $1. There has to be something behind this. I believe that he will get something worth a lot more than $1, but why are they parading the $1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C......N......C Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. I have goggled and can't find an answer to what Liddy is going to get
or why he is really doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's the Lee Iacocca Precedent
Iacocca took $1 salary as Chrysler CEO but was compensated on the back end after resuscitating the company.

I would personally not object to a similar arrangement for AIG provided that the company is genuinely improved, but not as a cover for rewarding poor performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. Congress needs to reverse the law regarding credit default swaps
that got passed in 2000. Listening to NPR on the way home about how it got passed. Wendy Gramm wife of former Phil Gramm was involved in deregulating this scam. As described, credit default swaps are side bets on whether someone will default on their loans. Which were I believe he stated illegal at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C......N......C Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Weren't credit swaps illegal and that was the law that made it legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC