Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why secretly funded DEA surveillance planes aren't flying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 08:46 PM
Original message
Why secretly funded DEA surveillance planes aren't flying
By Marisa Taylor | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — The first sign of trouble with the Drug Enforcement Administration's new surveillance planes surfaced almost immediately. On the way from the manufacturer to the agency's aviation headquarters, one of them veered off a runway during a fuel stop.

<snip>

In January, after less than 10 months of operation, the cascade of mechanical problems forced the DEA to ground the planes.

<snip>

The story behind why the DEA sought out the three planes, only to become the second federal agency to give them up, illustrates the pitfalls of "black," or classified, budgeting in which Congress approves tens of billions of dollars for intelligence agencies outside the public's view.

The twin-engine planes, manufactured by Schweizer Aircraft, likely came out of an even more shadowy funding provision known as "black earmarks," according to government officials with knowledge of the contract. The officials asked to remain anonymous because the planes, known as "Shadowhawks," received funding secretly.

<more>

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/64789.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fucking para$ites
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. People just can't afford the Crack it takes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Shadenfreude From the Black Budget Seems Appropriate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-25-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. As a glider instructor, I have a lot of time in Schweizer products (SGS 2-33, 2-32, 1-26)
Schweizer is to ab-initio soaring what Cessna is to ab-initio power flying. However, the Schweizers (and I knew most of 'em) got into military aircraft during Viet Nam. A good friend of mine was killed in Viet Nam in a Schweizer YO-3A (a modified 2-32 sailplane with a super-quiet engine and prop). Perhaps Schweizer should stick to gliders.


Schweizer/Lockheed YO-3A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC